Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2012 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5

Sfenoid açı cerrahi stratejiyi etkiler mi? anatomik ve radyolojik araştırma

Does the sphenoid angle effect the operation strategy? anatomical and radiological investigation

Pages
618–623
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This knowledge may be important for all surgeries requiring removal of the sphenoid wing and these region pathologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: The aim of our study is to suggest the sphenoid wing-lesser wing angulation (SWA) importance during surgeries directed to this region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MaterIal and Methods: SWA on 40 skulls were measured bilaterally (n=80).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This knowledge may be important for all surgeries requiring removal of the sphenoid wing and these region pathologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AIM: The aim of our study is to suggest the sphenoid wing-lesser wing angulation (SWA) importance during surgeries directed to this region. MaterIal and Methods: SWA on 40 skulls were measured bilaterally (n=80). The depth of the middle cranial fossa (DMCF) at the level of the SWA was determined. The same measurements were done on 40 randomly selected computerized tomography (CT) scans bilaterally (n=80). Results: The specimens were classified into 3 groups according the degree of SWA; Group-A, SWA was more than 130° (27%), Group-B, SWA was 110-130° (43%) and Group-C, SWA was less than 110° (28%). MCF was measured (mean) as 10.1 mm in Group-A, 6.4 mm in Group-B and 4.6 mm in Group-C. MCF was increasing with the increase in SWA. CT scans were classified into same procedure. Group-A was 26%, Group-B was 42% and Group-C was 31% fitting in the relevant groups. The superior orbital fissure (SOF) was evaluated according to the Sharma’s classification. ConclusIon: We suggest that by the preoperative evaluation of CT scans measurements the SWA, it is possible to estimate the MCF and the type of SOF. This knowledge may be important for all surgeries requiring removal of the sphenoid wing and these region pathologies.

Özet

AMAÇ: Çalışmamızın amacı sfenoid kemik-küçük kanat açısının (SWA), bu bölge cerrahi girişimlerinde önemini göstermektir. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: SWA, 40 kafatasında bilateral olarak ölçüldü (n=80). Orta kranial fossanın derinliği (DMCF), SWA seviyesinde değerlendirildi. Aynı ölçüm rastgele seçilmiş hastalarda tomografi (CT) iki taraflı olarak yapıldı (n=80). BULGULAR: Örnekler SK açısının derecesine göre 3 sınıfa ayrıldı; Grup-A’da açı 130°’den fazla (%27), Grup B’de açı 110-130° (%43) ve Grup C’de açı 110° den az (%28) idi. DMCF, (ortalama) Grup-A’da 10,1 mm, Grup-B’de 6,4 mm ve Grup-C’de 4,6 mm idi. SWA artması ile DMCF’nin arttığı görüldü. CT örneklerde, kurukafalarda yapılan sınıflandırmaya göre sınıflandırıldı. Buna göre Grup-A %26, Grup-B’de %42 ve Grup-C’de %31 olarak tespit edildi. Sonuçlar ile Sharma klasifikasyonuna göre superior orbital fissürün (SOF) değerlendirilmesi yapıldı. SONUÇ: Ameliyat öncesi CT görüntülemelerinde SWA ölçümü ile DMCF değerlendirilmesinin ve SOF tipinin ortaya konulmasının mümkün olabileceğini öngörüyoruz. Bu bilgi, özellikle sfenoid kanadın alınmasının gerektiği cerrahilerinde ve bu bölge patolojilerinde önemli olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHİLOĞULLARI, G., UZ, A., EROĞLU, Ü., APAYDIN, N., YESILIRMAK, Z., BASKAYA, M. K., EGEMEN, N. (2012). Sfenoid açı cerrahi stratejiyi etkiler mi? anatomik ve radyolojik araştırma. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5, 618–623. https://ajindex.com/articles/405534

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abdel Aziz KM, Chiocoine MR, van Loveren HR: Surgical corridors to the skull base, in Batjer HH, Loftus CM, (eds), Textbook of Neurological Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003: 29-44 2. Alvernia JE, Spomar DG, Olivero WC: A computed tomography scan and anatomical cadaveric study of the pterygopalatine ganglion for use in Gamma-Knife treatment of cluster headache. J Neurosurg 107: 805-808, 2007 3. Ammirati M, Bernardo A: Anatomical study of the superior orbital fissure as seen during a pterional approach. J Neurosurg 106:151-156, 2007 4. Brotchi J, Bonnal JP: Lateral and middle sphenoid wing meningiomas, in Al-Mefty O, (eds), Meningiomas. Newyork: Raven Press, 1991: 413-425 5. Bulsara KR, Leveque JC, Gray L, Fukushima T, Friedman AH, Villavicencio AT: Three-dimensional computed-tomographic analysis of the relationship between the arcuate eminence and the superior semicircular canal. Neurosurgery 59:7-12, 2006 6. Collignon F, Link M: Paraclinoid and cavernous sinus regions: Measurement of critical structures relevant for surgical procedure. Clin Anat 18: 3-9, 2005 7. Connolly ES, McKhann GM, Huang J: Fundamentals of opera- tive techniques in neurosurgery. Major cranial approaches- Pterional approaches. Newyork-Stuttgart: Thieme, 1994: 202- 209 8. Connolly ES, McKhann GM, Huang J: Fundamentals of operative techniques in neurosurgery. Major cranial approaches-Dolenc approach. Newyork-Stuttgart: Thieme, 1994: 268-275 9. Coscarella E, Baskaya MK, Morcos JJ: An alternative extradural exposure to the anterior clinoid process: The superior orbital fissure as a surgical corridor. Neurosurgery 53:162-167, 2003 10. Cui H, Wang Y, Yin Y, Wan J, Fei Z, Gao W, Jiang J: Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: A 26-case report. Surg Neurol 68: 6-10, 2007 11. Day AL, Cawley CM: Surgical managements of aneurysms and fistulas involving the cavernous sinus, in Schmidek A, Sweet WH, (eds), Operative Neurosurgical Techniques. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 2000: 341-350 12. Dolenc VV: Approaches to and techniques of surgery within the cavernous sinus, in Torrens M, Al-Mefty O, Kobayashi S, (eds), Operative Skull Base Surgery. Churchill Livingstone, 1997: 207-236 13. Ebeling U, Rikli D, Huber P, Reulen HJ: The coronal suture, a useful bony landmark in neurosurgery? Craniocerebral topography between bony landmarks on the skull and the brain. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 89:130-134, 1987 14. Govsa F, Kayalioglu G, Erturk M, Ozturk T: The supe