Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Kafa Kemik Kırıkları Önemi Açısından Sütüral Kemiklerin Radyoanatomik Olarak Saptanması

Anatomoradiological ıdentification of ıntrasutural Bones for ımportance of Cranial Fracture

Pages
357–362
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings prompted us to report these cases as their presence can lead to confusion in diagnosis in cases of skull fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Intrasutural bones are often found within sutures and fontanelles of the skull.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: Intrasutural bone location, its number and symmetry were investigated in totally 300 adult skulls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings prompted us to report these cases as their presence can lead to confusion in diagnosis in cases of skull fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AIM: Intrasutural bones are often found within sutures and fontanelles of the skull. It is important that the anatomy of these bones in the field of non-accidental injury with respect to medicolegal complications. Skull fracture lines are critical in their differential diagnosis, and the features of bone formations, their appearance and position give us a more definitive diagnosis. MATERIAL and METHODS: Intrasutural bone location, its number and symmetry were investigated in totally 300 adult skulls. RESULTS: 27 intrasutural bones were identified as interparietal (2%), preinterparietal (3%) and sutural bones (4%) were in the lambdoid sutures. It was detected that the interparietal and preparietal bones were single, and the sutural ones were in a multiple number. The sutural bones were superposed in significant structures such as sagittal sinus and sinus sigmoideus. CONCLUSION: The ones that should be paid attention to in the differential diagnosis of the skull fracture lines are preinterparietal and interparietal bones in larger sizes. These findings prompted us to report these cases as their presence can lead to confusion in diagnosis in cases of skull fractures.

Özet

AMAÇ: Sütüral kemikler kafatasında sıklıkla sütürler ve fontaneller içinde yerleşmişlerdir. Bu kemiklerin anatomisinin önemi travmaya bağlı olmaksızın bulunması nedeniyle adli yansımalarıdır. Kemik kırık hatları ayırıcı tanı, kemik oluşumları, görünüm ve konumları bize daha kesin bilgi vermek açısından önemlidir. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Sütüral kemiklerin yerleşimi, sayısı ve simetrisi 300 yetişkin kafatasında araştırıldı. BULGULAR: 27 tane sütüral kemik tanımlandı: interparietal (%2), preinterparietal (%3) ve sütüral kemik (%4) tanımıyla lambdoid sütür kemiği. Interparietal ve preparietal kemikler tek, sütüral olanları ise çok sayıda idi. Sütüral kemikler aynı zamanda sagittal sinüs ve sigmoid sinüs gibi önemli yapıların üzerine yerleşmiş idi. SONUÇ: Preparietal ve interparietal kemiklerin daha büyük boyutlarda olması kırık hattı ayırıcı tanısında dikkat edilmelidir. Bu olgularda elde ettiğimiz kemiklerin, tanıda kafa kırıkları ile karışabileceği yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖVSA, F., ÖZER, M. A., BAYRAKTAROĞLU, S., AKTAŞ, E. Ö. (2014). Kafa Kemik Kırıkları Önemi Açısından Sütüral Kemiklerin Radyoanatomik Olarak Saptanması. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 357–362. https://ajindex.com/articles/405461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Allen WE 3rd, Kier EL, Rothman SL: Pitfalls in the evaluation of skull trauma. A review. Radiol Clin North Am 11(3):479-503, 1973 2. Bristol RE, Krieger MD, McComb JG: Normally shaped heads with no sutures, normally shaped heads with abnormal sutures, and abnormally shaped heads with normal sutures. J Craniofac Surg 22(1):173-177, 2011 3. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger J: Surgical management of depressed cranial fractures. Neurosurgery 58(3 Suppl):S56-S60, 2006 4. Castillo M, Harris JH: Imaging of skull and brain emergencies. In: Harris JH, Harris WH (eds.) The Radiology Of Emergency Medicine, 4th ed. Philadelphia 2000:1-48 5. Furuya Y, Edwards MS, Alpers CE, Tress BM, Norman D, Ousterhout DK: Computerized tomography of cranial sutures. Part 2. Abnormalities of sutures and skull deformity in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 61(1):59-70, 1984 6. Choudhary AK, Jha B, Boal DK, Dias M: Occipital sutures and its variations: The value of 3D-CT and how to differentiate it from fractures using 3D-CT? Surg Radiol Anat 32(9):807-816, 2010 7. Fujita MQ, Taniguchi M, Zhu BL, Quan L, Ishida K, Oritani S, Kano T, Kamikodai Y, Maeda H: Inca bone in forensic autopsy: A report of two cases with a review of the literature. Leg Med (Tokyo) 4(3):197-201, 2002 8. Glass RB, Fernbach SK, Norton KI, Norton KI, Choi PS, Naidich TP: The infant skull: A vault of information. Radiographics 24(2):507-522, 2004 9. Gayretli O, Gurses IA, Kale A, Aksu F, Ozturk A, Bayraktar B, Sahinoglu K: The mendosal suture. Brit J Neurosurg 25(6): 730-733, 2011 10. O’Loughlin VD: Effects of different kinds of cranial deforma- tion on the incidence of wormian bones. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:146-155, 2004 11. Malhotra VK, Tewari PS, Pandey SN, Tewara SP: Interparietal bone. Acta Anat (Basel) 101:94–96, 1978 12. Mann SS, Naidich TP, Towbin RB, Doundoulakis SH: Imaging of the postnatal maturation of the skull base. Neuroimag Clin N Am 10(1):1-219, 2000 13. Matsumura G, Uchiumi T, Kida K, Ichikawa R, Kodama G: Developmental studies on the interparietal part of the human occipital squama. J Anat 182:197-204, 1993 14. Matsumura G, England MA, Uchiumi T, Kodama G: The fusion of ossification centres in the cartilaginous and membranous parts of the occipital squama in human fetuses. J Anat 185:295-300, 1994 15. Nikolić S, Zivkovic V, Juković F: Interparietal bone in forensic practice: Case report. Srp Arh Celok Lek 138(11-12):764-767, 2010 16. Opp