Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

En Bloc Cervical Laminoplasty While Preserving the Posterior Structure with Arcocristectomy in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Pages
790–796
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Arcocristectomy is an effective technique for the prevention of postoperative axial pain in patients with C6-7 spinal stenosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To evaluate the clinical success of the en bloc laminoplasty and impact of the arcocristectomy on postoperative axial pain of the patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: A retrospective review of 81 patients with CSM who underwent en bloc cervical laminoplasty while preserving posterior structure of the cervical spine during the period from 2007 to 2014 was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Arcocristectomy is an effective technique for the prevention of postoperative axial pain in patients with C6-7 spinal stenosis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To evaluate the clinical success of the en bloc laminoplasty and impact of the arcocristectomy on postoperative axial pain of the patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIAL and METHODS: A retrospective review of 81 patients with CSM who underwent en bloc cervical laminoplasty while preserving posterior structure of the cervical spine during the period from 2007 to 2014 was performed. Arcocristectomy was performed if the C6-7 level was included in the surgery. The posterior spinal elements and muscles attached to the spinous process of C2 and C7 were preserved. Thus, postoperative deformity of the cervical spine could be avoided. The neurological status of the patients was assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale. The neurological recovery rate was calculated according to the Hirabayashi method. RESULTS: The mean modified JOA scale score was 11.4±2.4 preoperatively and 15.0±3.9 postoperatively. The neurological recovery rate was 68.6%. C7 arcocristectomy was performed in 19 patients. No axial pain was noted in the first 2 postoperative months. Keyhole foraminotomies were performed in 11 patients and radicular pain completely resolved after surgery. Temporary C5 nerve root palsy was observed in 3 patients. Mean cervical spine lordosis was 10.6o±10.5o preoperatively and 8.6o±9.5o postoperatively. No postoperative spinal instability or kyphotic deformity was noted. CONCLUSION: En bloc cervical laminoplasty while preserving posterior structure is useful in preventing postoperative spinal malalignment and axial pain. Arcocristectomy is an effective technique for the prevention of postoperative axial pain in patients with C6-7 spinal stenosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜMTÜRK, A., KÜÇÜK, A., MENKÜ, A., KOÇ, R. K. (2017). En Bloc Cervical Laminoplasty While Preserving the Posterior Structure with Arcocristectomy in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 790–796. https://ajindex.com/articles/405381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Amaral SH, Silva MN, Giraldi M, Viterbo MBS, Pereira CAB: Multiple cervical arcocristectomies for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Surgical technique and results. J Neurosurg Spine 7:503-508, 2007 2. Ball JM, Cagle P, Johnson BE, Lucasey C, Lukert BP: Spinal extension exercises prevent natural progression of kyphosis. Osteoporos Int 20:481-489, 2009 3. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Haden T: Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 4:286-295, 1991 4. Bohlman HH, Emery SE: The pathophysiology of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Spine 13:843- 846, 2001 5. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS: Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431-2434, 2002 6. Emery SE, Bohlman HH, Bolesta MJ, Jones SK: Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 80:941-951, 1998 7. Fernyhough JC, White JI, LaRocca H: Fusion rate in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine 16:S561-564, 1991 8. Heller JG, Edwards CC II, Murakami H, Rodts GE: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: An independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 26:1330-1336, 2001 9. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81: 519 -528, 1999 10. Hirabayashi K, Miyagawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K: Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 6:354-364, 1981 11. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Fujii R, Yoshikawa H: C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J 15: 1375- 1379, 2006 12. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H: En bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles. J Neurosurg Spine 3:29-33, 2005 13. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K: Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty: A noticeable complication. Spine 21:1969- 1973, 1996 14. Iizuka H, Nakajima T, Iizuka Y, Sorimachi Y, Ara T, Nishinome M, Takagishi K: Cervical malalignment after laminoplasty: Relationship to deep extensor musculature of the