Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Perioperative Technical Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgeries

Pages
483–489
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We are still learning from these events and advance our surgical approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeries are multi-faceted and the various steps are interconnected.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: This study is a retrospective qualitative analysis of the documented technical events encountered during DBS surgeries from 1999 onwards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We are still learning from these events and advance our surgical approaches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeries are multi-faceted and the various steps are interconnected. Since its first implementation, the method of DBS surgery has undergone changes. We have encountered several expected and also non-expected perioperative technical complications in the past seventeen years. Here, we describe the stereotactic frame, stereotactic localizer and planning station related complications and how we have managed them as much as possible. MATERIAL and METHODS: This study is a retrospective qualitative analysis of the documented technical events encountered during DBS surgeries from 1999 onwards. We have collected these events from a cohort of approximately 921 DBS electrodes implantations from the centers of the authors. RESULTS: Stereotactic frame related complications included movement related fixation problems, head anatomy related problems, and lack of maintenance related issues. Localizer related complications were compatibility issues of the stereotactic localizer and planning station, field of view effect on fiducials, air bubbles in localizers using liquid solutions, and disengaged localizer effect. Planning station related complications included image fusion failures and cerebrospinal fluid signal effect on image fusion. CONCLUSION: The road to success in DBS therapy passes through the ability to cope with surgical and technical complications. Each step is unconditionally connected to the other, and detection of the problems that can be encountered in advance and preparations for these negative conditions are the key to success for the group responsible for executing the therapy. We are still learning from these events and advance our surgical approaches.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUBBEN3, P. L., TEMEL, Y., ACKERMANS, L., GUBLER, F. S., KOCABICAK, E., ALPTEKIN, O. (2018). Perioperative Technical Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgeries. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 483–489. https://ajindex.com/articles/405349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Bériault S, Sadikot AF, Alsubaie F, Drouin S, Collins DL, Pike GB: Neuronavigation using susceptibility-weighted venography: Application to deep brain stimulation and comparison with gadolinium contrast: Technical note. J Neurosurg 121(1):131- 141, 2014 2. Chan DT, Zhu XL, Yeung JH, Mok VC, Wong E, Lau C, Wong R, Lau C, Poon WS, Group TMD: Complications of deep brain stimulation: A collective review. Asian J Surg 32(4):258-263, 2009 3. Dormont D, Ricciardi KG, Tandé D, Parain K, Menuel C, Galanaud D, Navarro S, Cornu P, Agid Y, Yelnik J: Is the subthalamic nucleus hypointense on T2-weighted images? A correlation study using MR imaging and stereotactic atlas data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(9):1516-1523, 2004 4. Fenoy AJ, Simpson RK Jr: Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: Management and avoidance: Clinical article. J Neurosurg 120(1):132-139, 2014 5. Flusser J, Sroubek F, Zitova B: Image fusion: Principles, methods, and applications. Tutorial Eusipco, 2007 6. Hertel F, Husch A, Dooms G, Bernard F, Gemmar P: Susceptibility-weighted MRI for deep brain stimulation: Potentials in trajectory planning. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 93(5):303-308, 2015 7. Kocabicak E, Aygun D, Ozaydin I, Jahanshahi AKH, Tan S, Onar M, Boke O, Kurt M, Guz H, Terzi M, Alptekin O, Temel Y: Does Probe's Eye Subthalamic nucleus length on T2W MRI correspond with microelectrode recording in patients with deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's Disease? Turk Neurosurg 23(5):658-665, 2013 8. Kocabicak E, Temel Y, Höllig A, Falkenburger B, Tan SK: Current perspectives on deep brain stimulation for severe neurological and psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 11:1051, 2015 9. O'Gorman RL, Shmueli K, Ashkan K, Samuel M, Lythgoe DJ, Shahidiani A, Wastling SJ, Footman M, Selway RP, Jarosz J: Optimal MRI methods for direct stereotactic targeting of the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus. Eur Radiol 21(1):130-136, 2011 10. Oh MY, Abosch A, Kim SH, Lang AE, Lozano AM: Long-term hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 50(6):1268-1276, 2002 11. Ortendahl DA, Posin JP, Hylton NM, Mills CM: Optimal visualization of cerebrospinal fluid on MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 7(3):403-407, 1986 12. Plantinga BR, Temel Y, Roebroeck A, Uludag K, Ivanov D, Kuijf ML, ter Haar Romenij BM: Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging of the basal ganglia and related structures. Front Hum Neurosci 8:876, 2014 13. Tan SK, Vlamings R, Lim L, S