AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightAlthough the perforation rate (especially for perforations in the middle portion of the septum)was statistically greater in Group 1 than in Group 2, the hyposmia rate was statistically greater in Group 2 than in Group 1.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
AIM: To compare sinonasal complications after microscopic and endoscopic approaches for pituitary adenomas.MATERIAL and METHODS: At our clinic, sinonasal complications occurred in 31 patients who underwent microscopictranssphenoidal surgery between 2007 and 2014 and in 32 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery between2014 and 2016. We statistically compared the complications observed during endoscopic sinonasal examination performed by anotorhinolaryngologist.RESULTS: Sinonasal pathology occurred in 22 of the 31 patients (70.9%) in the microscopy group (Group 1) and 19 of the 32(59.3%) in the endoscopy group (Group 2). Of the 31 patients in Group 1, 13 had nasal septal perforation, 13 had nasal synechiae,three had anosmia, two had hyposmia and one had saddle nose deformity. In Group 2, no patient had nasal septal perforation,whereas eight had nasal synechiae, one had anosmia, 11 had hyposmia, and 4 had infection.CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in sinonasal complications (e.g. synechiae, anosmia, deformity,and sinusitis) between the two groups. Although the perforation rate (especially for perforations in the middle portion of the septum)was statistically greater in Group 1 than in Group 2, the hyposmia rate was statistically greater in Group 2 than in Group 1.