Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Initial Discectomy Associated with Aging Leading to Adjacent Disc Disease and Recurrence

Pages
595–600
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Altered biomechanical loading next to a fusion resulted in ongoing degeneration with aging at the affected entire lumbar spine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Failure of surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) can be commonly caused by recurrence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: Between 1999 and 2009, 1898 cases were operated and 142 (6.4%) patients underwent re-discectomy following initial operation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Altered biomechanical loading next to a fusion resulted in ongoing degeneration with aging at the affected entire lumbar spine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: Failure of surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) can be commonly caused by recurrence. There are many debates regarding the risk factors of recurrent LDH (rLDH) and it is very difficult to define them because many clinical and complicated biomechanical parameters are involved. The purpose of study was to evaluate the long term result of re-discectomy for LDH at the same level and adjacent segments. MATERIAL and METHODS: Between 1999 and 2009, 1898 cases were operated and 142 (6.4%) patients underwent re-discectomy following initial operation. The study included 65 patients who were operated for single level discectomy, and their charts were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 33 (50.8%) women and mean age was 45.5 years (24-73 years). rLDH was diagnosed at the initial level in 40 (61.5%) but adjacent and/or opposite level herniation (with or without the first level) was found in the remaining 25 cases (39.1%). Recurrence at the same level (SLG) and adjacent level groups (ALG) were similar according to the clinical outcomes in follow-up (mean 34.1 months). Admission period after initial operation was also parallel in SLG and ALG (54.7 and 53.1 months, respectively). However, the mean age of ALG (49.4 years) was significantly higher (p<=0.05) than SLG (42.8 years). CONCLUSION: After discectomy, collapsed discs are biomechanically more stable than those with preserved disc heights, and responses to axial compression on intervertebral disc pressure produced deformations of adjacent levels despite limitations. Altered biomechanical loading next to a fusion resulted in ongoing degeneration with aging at the affected entire lumbar spine.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALGIÇ, A., YILDIRIM, A. E., OKAY, Ö., UÇKUN, Ö., ALAGÖZ, F., POLAT, Ö., AKDAG, R., NACAR, O., DAĞLIOĞLU, E., BELEN, A. D. (2016). Initial Discectomy Associated with Aging Leading to Adjacent Disc Disease and Recurrence. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 595–600. https://ajindex.com/articles/404718

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE: Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30: 927-935, 2005 2. Axelsson P, Karlsson BS: Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process: A radiostereometric analysis. Eur Spine J 13:567-572, 2004 3. Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thome C: Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: Part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine 33:273-279, 2008 4. Barth M, Weiss C, Thomé C: Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: Part 1: evaluation of clinical outcome. Spine 33:265-272, 2008 5. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D: Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: The effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A: 102-108, 2003 6. Chan D, Song Y, Sham P, Cheung KM: Genetics of disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 15 Suppl 3: S317-325, 2006 7. Cinotti G, Roysam GS, Eisenstein SM, Postacchini F: Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. A prospective, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:825-832, 1998 8. Dora C, Schmid MR, Elfering A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N: Lumbar disk herniation: Do MR imaging findings predict recurrence after surgical diskectomy? Radiology 235:562- 567, 2005 9. Eser O, Eser B, Cosar M, Erdogan MO, Aslan A, Yıldız H, Solak M, Haktanır A: Short aggrecan gene repetitive alleles associated with lumbar degenerative disc disease in Turkish patients. Genet Mol Res 30:1923-1930, 2011 10. Frei H, Oxland TR, Rathonyi GC, Nolte LP: The effect of nucleotomy on lumbar spine mechanics in compression and shear loading. Spine 26:2080-2089, 2001 11. Gruber HE, Hanley EN Jr: Analysis of aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Comparison of surgical specimens with normal controls. Spine 23:751-757, 1998 12. Guo JJ, Yang H, Tang T: Long-term outcomes of the revision open lumbar discectomy by fenestration: A follow-up study of more than 10 years. Int Orthop 33:1341-1345, 2009 13. Hadjipavlou AG, Simmons JW, Pope MH, Necessary JT, Goel VK: Pathomechanics and clinical relevance of disc degeneration and annular tear: A point-of-view review. Am J Orthop 28:561-571, 1999 14. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR: The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: A critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1