Journals / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Endoscopic evaluation of acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation INTESTINE

Pages
312–316
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients with intestinal symptoms after HCT, upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy and sigmoidoscopy has an acceptable diagnostic yield for intestinal involvement

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), with the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) as one of the main target organs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study aimed to determine the endoscopic and histological findings in acute GVHD.Materials and Methods: The data of 111 patients who had received allogeneic HCT were retrospectively reviewed.Results: Allogeneic HCT was performed in 111 patients, of whom 27 (24.3%) had developed acute GVHD.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients with intestinal symptoms after HCT, upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy and sigmoidoscopy has an acceptable diagnostic yield for intestinal involvement
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), with the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) as one of the main target organs. There is a lack of consensus regarding the site in GIT with the highest sensitivity for biopsy. The present study aimed to determine the endoscopic and histological findings in acute GVHD.Materials and Methods: The data of 111 patients who had received allogeneic HCT were retrospectively reviewed.Results: Allogeneic HCT was performed in 111 patients, of whom 27 (24.3%) had developed acute GVHD. Nineteen of the 111 patients with intestinal symptoms were evaluated for intestinal involvement, and 17 were diagnosed with acute intestinal GVHD. Upper endoscopic findings had a sensitivity of 64.7%, a specificity of 50%, a positive predictive value of 91.6% and a negative predictive value of 14.2%. The diagnostic accuracy of upper endoscopy was 63.1%. Lower endoscopic findings had a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 0%. The diagnostic accuracy of upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy and sigmoidoscopy was 94.1%.Conclusion: Endoscopic findings are nonspecific in acute intestinal GVHD. There is little agreement between endoscopic findings and histopathology; thus, biopsies are essential. In patients with intestinal symptoms after HCT, upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy and sigmoidoscopy has an acceptable diagnostic yield for intestinal involvement

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMEN, A., TEK, İ., SOYDAN, E., YÜKSEL, M. K. (2016). Endoscopic evaluation of acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation INTESTINE. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 312–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/404664

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development Project on criteria for clinical tri- als in chronic graft versus host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945-56. [CrossRef] Jagasia M, Arora M, Flowers ME, et al. Risk factors for acute GVHD and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2012, 119: 296-307. [CrossRef] Gale RP, Bortin MM, Van Bekkum DW, et al. Risk factors of acute graft versus host disease. Br J Haematol 1987; 67: 397-406. [CrossRef] Hahn T, McCarthy PL Jr, Zhang MJ, et al. Risk factors for acute graft versus host disease after human leukocyte antigen identical sib- ling transplants for adults with leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5728-34. [CrossRef] Flowers ME, Inamoto Y, Carpenter PA, et al. Comparative analysis of risk factors for acute graft versus host disease and for chron- ic graft versus host disease according to National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Blood 2011; 117: 3214-9. [CrossRef] Ratanatharathorn V, Nash RA, Przepiorka D, et al. Phase III study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus with metotrexate and cyclosporine for graft versus host disease prophylaxis after HLA- identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1998; 92: 2303-14.
  2. Kreisel W, Dahlberg M, Bertz H, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of acute intestinal GVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic SCT: a retrospective analysis in 175 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 430-8. [CrossRef] Aslanian H, Chander B, Robert M, et al. Prospective evaluation of acute graft versus host disease. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 720-5. [CrossRef] Ponec RJ, Hackman RC, McDonald GB. Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of intestinal graft versus host disease after marrow transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 612-21. [CrossRef] Ross WA, Ghosh S, Dekovich AA, et al. Endoscopic biopsy diag- nosis of acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease: recto- sigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 982-9. [CrossRef] Socie G, Marie JY, Lemann M, et al. Prognostic value of apoptotic cells and infiltrating neutrophils in graft versus host disease of the gastrointestinal tract in humans: TNF and Fas expression. Blood 2004; 103: 50-7. [CrossRef] Rowlings PA, Przepiorka D, Klein JP, et al. IBMTR Severity Index for grading acute graft versus host disease: retrospective com- parison with Glucksberg