Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct

Pages
704–708
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarct can be a life-saving procedure but is not useful in cases with a Glasgow coma scale score of 7 and below.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Decompressive hemicraniectomy for a malignant middle cerebral artery infarct can be a life-saving surgical treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METhODS: The clinical condition, radiological findings and surgical treatment results of 42 cases that underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy for a malignant middle cerebral artery infarct were retrospectively evaluated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarct can be a life-saving procedure but is not useful in cases with a Glasgow coma scale score of 7 and below.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: Decompressive hemicraniectomy for a malignant middle cerebral artery infarct can be a life-saving surgical treatment. We aimed to investigate the surgical treatment results in cases that underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy for a malignant middle cerebral artery infarct in this study. MATERIAL and METhODS: The clinical condition, radiological findings and surgical treatment results of 42 cases that underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy for a malignant middle cerebral artery infarct were retrospectively evaluated in this study. RESULTS: There were 19 males and 23 females. The age range was 27 to 78 years with a mean age of 57.6 years. The infarct area was the non-dominant hemisphere in 20 cases and the dominant hemisphere in 22 cases. Preoperative Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores were 5 to 12. The 42 cases with a malignant middle cerebral artery infarct were divided into 2 groups according to the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) as the unfavorable outcome group (Group 1) with a score of 1 to 3 and the favorable outcome group with a score of 4 to 5 (Group 2). There were 27 cases in Group 1 and 15 in Group 2. There was a statistically significant association between a good result and age, Glasgow coma scale at the time of surgery, duration until surgery, and non-dominant hemisphere involvement. All cases with a Glasgow coma scale score of 7 or below had a poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarct can be a life-saving procedure but is not useful in cases with a Glasgow coma scale score of 7 and below.

🔖

Cite This Article

GULENSOY, B., KARATAY, M., ERDEM, Y., ÇELİK, H., TAŞÇIOĞLU, T., SERTBAŞ, İ., GURSOY, T., KUL, H., GÖKÇEK, C., YAŞITLI, U., BAYAR, M. A. (2016). Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 704–708. https://ajindex.com/articles/404657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J,Kasner SE, Hill MD, Berrouschot J, Schmutzhard E, Harms L, Verro P, Krieger D: Computed tomographic parameters predicting fatal outcome in large middle cerebral artery infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis 16(3): 230-235, 2003 2. Berrouschot J, Sterker M, Bettin S, Köster J, Schneider D: Mortality of space-occupying ('malignant') middle cerebral artery infarction under conservative intensive care. Intensive Care Med 24(6): 620-623, 1998 3. Bounds JV, Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Okazaki H: Mechanisms and timing of deaths from cerebral infarction. Stroke 12(4): 474-477, 1981 4. Chen CC, Cho DY, Tsai SC: Outcome of and prognostic factors for decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. J Clin Neurosci 14(4): 317- 321, 2007 5. Curry WT Jr, Sethi MK, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS: Factors associated with outcome after hemicraniectomy for large middle cerebral artery territory infarction. Neurosurgery 56(4): 681-692, 2005 6. Frank JI, Schumm LP, Wroblewski K, Chyatte D, Rosengart AJ, Kordeck C, Thisted RA
  2. HeADDFIRST Trialists: Hemicraniectomy and durotomy upon deterioration from infarction-related swelling trial: Randomized pilot clinical trial. Stroke 45(3):781-787, 2014 7. Gupta R, Connolly ES, Mayer S, Elkind MS: Hemicraniectomy for massive middle cerebral artery territory infarction: A systematic review. Stroke 35(2):539-543, 2004 8. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R: 'Malignant' middle cerebral artery territory infarction: Clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 53(4):309-315, 1996 9. Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, Amelink GJ, van Gijn J, van der Worp HB
  3. HAMLET investigators: Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Life-threatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): A multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 8(4):326-333, 2009 10. Inamasu J, Kaito T, Watabe T, Ganaha T, Yamada Y, Tanaka T, Imizu S, Hayashi T, Hayakawa M, Kato Y, Hirose Y: Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric stroke in the elderly: Comparison of outcomes between individuals 61-70 and >70 years of age. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22(8):1350-1354, 2013 11. Johnson RD, Maartens NF, Teddy PJ: Decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Evidence and controversies. Clin Neurosci 18(8):1018-1022, 2011 12. Jüttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, Unterberg A, Hennerici M, Woitzik J,