Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Prediction of Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients' Satisfaction with the Aid of an Artificial Neural Network

Pages
253–259
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The current study is the first one reporting on the capability of an ANN to accurately predict the satisfaction levels of LDH patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To identify key determinants of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients' satisfaction and to evaluate the efficiency of an artificial neural network (ANN) model to prognosticate satisfaction derived from the hospital stay in this specific patient group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Principal component analysis evaluated several aspects of care (15 items).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The current study is the first one reporting on the capability of an ANN to accurately predict the satisfaction levels of LDH patients.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To identify key determinants of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients' satisfaction and to evaluate the efficiency of an artificial neural network (ANN) model to prognosticate satisfaction derived from the hospital stay in this specific patient group. MATERIAl and METhODS: A single item question was used to assess patient satisfaction. Principal component analysis evaluated several aspects of care (15 items). An ANN encompassed all variables and its prediction ability was tested. The ANN performance was correlated to a binary logistic regression (BLR) model. RESUlTS: Higher levels of satisfaction were reported by females, older patients, Greeks, and patients with elementary education staying in not rural areas. A history of a single previous hospitalisation was correlated with more satisfaction. The accuracy of ANN was 96% for satisfaction prediction outperforming the BLR model. CONClUSION: Satisfactory health services are influenced by sex, age, nationality, and number of prior admissions. The selfperceived health state plays also a crucial role. The current study is the first one reporting on the capability of an ANN to accurately predict the satisfaction levels of LDH patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

MATIS, G. K., CHRYSOU, O. I., SILVA, D., KARANIKAS, M. A., BALTSAVIAS, G., LYRATZOPOULOS, N., BAROUTAS, S., BIRBILIS, T. A. (2016). Prediction of Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients' Satisfaction with the Aid of an Artificial Neural Network. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 253–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/404630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Andrzejewski N, Lagua RT: Use of a customer satisfaction survey by health care regulators: A tool for total quality management. Public Health Rep 112:206-210, 1997 Bateson JEG: Managing services marketing. Text and readings. Fortworth: Dryden Press, 1995
  2. Bishop JB, Szpalski M, Ananthraman SK, McIntyre DR, Pope MH: Classification of low back pain from dynamic motion characteristics using an artificial neural network. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2991-2998, 1997
  3. Bittner MJ, Booms BH, Tetreault MS: The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. J Mark 54:69- 82, 1990 Cafferky ME: Managed Care & You. Los Angeles: Health Information Press, 1997
  4. Cheng SH, Yang MC, Chiang TL: Patient satisfaction with and recommendation of a hospital: Effects of interpersonal and technical aspects of hospital care. Int J Qual Health Care 15:345- 355, 2003 Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297-334, 1951 Cunningham L: The Quality Connection in Health Care. Integrating Patient Satisfaction and Risk Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers, 1991 Donabedian A: An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003
  5. Enthoven AC, Vorhaus CB: A vision of quality in health care delivery. Health Affairs 16:44-57, 1997
  6. Gonzalez N, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Escobar A, Aizpuru F, Thompson A, Esteban C, Sebastián JA, de la Sierra E: Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire. Int J Qual Health Care 17:465-472, 2005
  7. Hargraves JL, Wilson IB, Zaslavsky A, James C, Walker JD, Rogers G, Cleary PD: Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care 39:635-641, 2001 Kaiser HF: A second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika 35:401-415, 1970 Kline P: An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. London: Routledge, 1994
  8. Labarere J, Francois P, Bertrand D, Peyrin JC, Robert C, Fourny M: Outpatient satisfaction: validation of a French-language questionnaire: Data quality and identification of associated factors. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 7:63-69, 1999 Likert R: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1-55, 1932
  9. Matis GK, Birbilis TA, Chrysou OI, Zissimopoulos A: Satisfaction survey of Greek inpatients with brain cancer. J BUON 15:157-163, 2010
  10. Matis GK, Birbilis TA, Chrysou OI: Patient satisfaction questionnaire and quality achievement in hospital care: The case of a Greek public university ho