Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Calvarial Reconstruction of Small-Size Skull Defects Performing “8 Cranioplasty” in Children: Surgical Experience, Clinical Results and Treatment Algorithm

Pages
573–584
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, our algorithm specified for this procedure is purposive and also saves the surgeon time in the surgical planning stage

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIm: To report our clinical experience, surgical treatment algorithm and technique in the reconstruction of uncomplicated and small-size calvarial defects by performing autologous split-bone grafting technique on anatomical findings and patients’ outcome. mATERIAl and mEThODS: We covered the defective calvarial zone without bone (area, 3.8 to 7.5 centimetersquare; median area 4.2 centimetersquare) following the resection of pathological skull region with an inner table of horizontally split adjacent skull site in thirty-six patients (aged between 28 and 125 months; median age, 68.75 months, minimum follow-up 14 months).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The donor site, the characteristics of skin incision such as length, shape, location and bone splitting technique were determined based on our treatment algorithm for “8 cranioplasty”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, our algorithm specified for this procedure is purposive and also saves the surgeon time in the surgical planning stage
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIm: To report our clinical experience, surgical treatment algorithm and technique in the reconstruction of uncomplicated and small-size calvarial defects by performing autologous split-bone grafting technique on anatomical findings and patients’ outcome. mATERIAl and mEThODS: We covered the defective calvarial zone without bone (area, 3.8 to 7.5 centimetersquare; median area 4.2 centimetersquare) following the resection of pathological skull region with an inner table of horizontally split adjacent skull site in thirty-six patients (aged between 28 and 125 months; median age, 68.75 months, minimum follow-up 14 months). The donor site, the characteristics of skin incision such as length, shape, location and bone splitting technique were determined based on our treatment algorithm for “8 cranioplasty”. Pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes and courses as well as radiological results are documented. RESUlTS: Mean follow-up period for all children was 25 months. There was no mortality and 5.55% morbidity (n=2: 1 sterile wound dehiscence and 1 sterile wound discharge). No infected flap was seen and none of the patients required a second surgery. No graft failure, tumor recurrence or residue occurred. CONClUSION: Almost all of our patients reported good surgical and clinical outcomes with this presented management and surgical algorithm. Autologous split bone grafting technique in small-size skull defects, with its proposed name “8 cranioplasty” is a safe and effective reconstructive procedure due to its short-term surgery, small-size surgical zone, low complication rate, good cosmetic results and cost effectiveness. In addition, our algorithm specified for this procedure is purposive and also saves the surgeon time in the surgical planning stage

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, İ., KAHİLOĞULLARI, G., SEKMEN, H., EROĞLU, Ü., ÖZGÜRAL, O., UNLU, M. A. (2017). Calvarial Reconstruction of Small-Size Skull Defects Performing “8 Cranioplasty” in Children: Surgical Experience, Clinical Results and Treatment Algorithm. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 573–584. https://ajindex.com/articles/404617

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Agrawal A, Garg LN: Split calvarial bone graft for the reconstruction of skull defects. J Surg Tech Case Report 3: 13-16, 2011 2. Artico M, Ferrante L, Pastore FS, Ramundo EO, Cantarelli D, Scopelliti D: Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: Historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 60: 71- 79, 2003 3. Brusati R, Biglioli F, Mortini P, Raffaini M, Goisis M: Reconstruction of the orbital walls in surgery of the skull base for benign neoplasms. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29: 325-330, 2000 4. Ducic Y: Titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty: A report of 20 cases. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 60: 272-276, 2002 5. Frodel JL: Calvarial bone graft harvest in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121: 78-81, 1999 6. Gil Z, Abergel A, Leider_Trejo L, Khafif A, Margalit N, Amir A, Gur E, Fliss DM: A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections. Skull Base 17: 25-37, 2007 7. Gruss JS, Mackinson SE, Kassel EE, Cooper PW: The role of primary bone grafting in complex craniomaxillofacial trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 75: 17-24, 1985 8. Gupta SK, Reddy NM, Khosla VK, Mathuriya SN, Shama BS, Pathak A, Tewari K, Kak VK: Growing skull fractures: A clinical study of 41 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:928–932, 1997 9. Hockley AD, Goldin JH, Wake MJC, Iqbal J: Skull repair in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:271–275, 1990-1991 10. Hunter D, Baker S, Sobol SM: Split calvarial grafts in maxillofacial reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 102: 345-350, 1990 11. Inoue A, Satoh S, Sekiguchi K, Ibuchi Y, Katoh S, Ota K, Fujimori S: Cranioplasty with split-thickness calvarial bone. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 35:804-807, 1995 12. Iwama T, Yamada J, Imai S, Shinoda J, Funakoshi T, Sakai N: The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited. Neurosurgery 52: 591–596, 2003 13. Josan VA, Sgouros S, Walsh AR, Dover MS, Nishikawa H, Hockley AD: Cranioplasty in children. Childs Nerv Syst 21: 200-204, 2005 14. Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V: Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: Critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 14:144-153, 2003 15. Neligan PC, Boyd JB: Reconstruction of the cranial base defect. Clin Plast Surg 22: 71-77, 1995 16. Powell NB, Riley RW: Facial contouring with outer-table calvarial bone: A 4 year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 1454-1458, 1