Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Surgical Strategies and Functional Outcome of Intramedullary Cervicomedullary Ependymoma

Pages
563–572
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A favorable functional outcome could be achieved for most ICE patients in the long term

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIm: To evaluate the surgical strategies and functional outcomes of intramedullary cervicomedullary ependymoma (ICE). mATERIAl and mEThODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data of 28 ICE patients who underwent surgical resection, including 11 males and 17 females and the average age was 37.9 years (range:11-69 years).
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESUlTS: Gross total resections (GTRs) were performed in 21 patients (75.0%), and subtotal resections (STRs) were achieved in the other 7 patients (25.0%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A favorable functional outcome could be achieved for most ICE patients in the long term
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIm: To evaluate the surgical strategies and functional outcomes of intramedullary cervicomedullary ependymoma (ICE). mATERIAl and mEThODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data of 28 ICE patients who underwent surgical resection, including 11 males and 17 females and the average age was 37.9 years (range:11-69 years). The modified McCormick grading system (mMG) was used to evaluate the neurological functions before surgery, at discharge and at long-term follow-up. RESUlTS: Gross total resections (GTRs) were performed in 21 patients (75.0%), and subtotal resections (STRs) were achieved in the other 7 patients (25.0%). An ill-defined tumor border was a significant factor leading to STR (p=0.026). At discharge, the mMG improved in 11 patients (39.3%), stabilized in 14 (50.0%), and worsened in 3 (10.7%). The 3 patients with deterioration were all in the STR Group and the neurological deterioration rate was significantly higher in the STR Group than that in the GTR Group (p=0.011). The follow-up period ranged from 9 to 77 months (mean 49.6±26.9 months). Two patients (7.1%) had tumor recurrence during this period. The long-term follow-up mMG was improved in 25 patients (89.3%), stabilized in 3 (10.7%), and no one worsened, compared with preoperative mMG. CONClUSION: GTR of ICE could be achieved in majority of patients, especially for those with well-defined tumor boundaries. GTR lead to a better outcome in the short term after surgery. A favorable functional outcome could be achieved for most ICE patients in the long term

🔖

Cite This Article

GE, X., WU, Z., ZHANG, J., ZHANG, L. (2017). Surgical Strategies and Functional Outcome of Intramedullary Cervicomedullary Ependymoma. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 563–572. https://ajindex.com/articles/404616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Aghakhani N, David P, Parker F, Lacroix C, Benoudiba F, Tadie M: Intramedullary spinal ependymomas: Analysis of a consecutive series of 82 adult cases with particular attention to patients with no preoperative neurological deficit. Neurosurgery 62:1279-1285
  2. discussion 1285-1286, 2008 2. Ahyai A, Woerner U, Markakis E: Surgical treatment of intramedullary tumors (spinal cord and medulla oblongata). Analysis of 16 cases. Neurosurg Rev 13:45-52, 1990 3. Bostrom A, von LM, Hartmann W, Pietsch T, Feuss M, Bostrom JP, Schramm J, Simon M: Surgery for spinal cord ependymomas: Outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery 68:302-308
  3. discussion 309, 2011 4. Chen P, Sui M, Ye J, Wan Z, Chen F, Luo C: An integrative analysis of treatment, outcomes and prognostic factors for primary spinal anaplastic ependymomas. J Clin Neurosci 22:976-980, 2015 5. Deng X, Wang K, Wu L, Yang C, Yang T, Zhao L, Yang J, Wang G, Fang J, Xu Y: Intraspinal hemangioblastomas: Analysis of 92 cases in a single institution. J Neurosurg Spine 21:260- 269, 2014 6. Ferrante L, Mastronardi L, Celli P, Lunardi P, Acqui M, Fortuna A: Intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas-a study of 45 cases with long-term follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 119:74- 79, 1992 7. Figueiredo N, Brooks N, Resnick DK: Evidence-based review and guidelines for the management of myxopapillary and intramedullary ependymoma. J Neurosurg Sci 57:327-341, 2013 8. Gavin QD, Farooqi N, Pigott TJ, Findlay GF, Pillay R, Buxton N, Jenkinson MD: Outcome predictors in the management of spinal cord ependymoma. Eur Spine J 16:399-404, 2007 9. Guyotat J, Metellus P, Giorgi R, Barrie M, Jouvet A, FevreMontange M, Chinot O, Durand A, Figarella-Branger D: Infratentorial ependymomas: Prognostic factors and outcome analysis in a multi-center retrospective series of 106 adult patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:947-960, 2009 10. Hanbali F, Fourney DR, Marmor E, Suki D, Rhines LD, Weinberg JS, McCutcheon IE, Suk I, Gokaslan ZL: Spinal cord ependymoma: Radical surgical resection and outcome. Neurosurgery 51:1162-1172
  4. discussion 1172-1174, 2002 11. Hsu W, Pradilla G, Constantini S, Jallo GI: Surgical considerations of spinal ependymomas in the pediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst 25:1253-1259, 2009 12. Jenkinson MD, Simpson C, Nicholas RS, Miles J, Findlay GF, Pigott TJ: Outcome predictors and complications in the management of intradural spinal tumours. Eur Spine J 15:203- 210, 2006 13. Klekamp J: Spinal ependymomas. Part 1: Intramedullary epe