AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIt can be used at other subaxial levels, and also in selected cases where othertechniques could not be performed.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
AIM: To evaluate the results of patients who underwent axial, subaxial and upper thoracic laminar screw fixation for posteriorstabilization.MATERIAL and METHODS: The patients who underwent laminar screws at the cervical and upper thoracic levels in our clinic in a5-year period were evaluated retrospectively.RESULTS: A total of 54 laminar screws were used in 25 patients, aged between 6 and 82 years. The most frequent diagnoses werecervical spinal stenosis and craniovertebral junction anomalies. There were handicaps to perform other type of screws in 19 out of25 screws during the first 4 years, and 9 out of 29 in the last year (p=0.0009). Two modifications were performed in some cases.In 4 segments with thin lamina, a shorter screw was used to leave clear the thinnest part, and in 3 C2 levels with almost full-lengthbifid spinous process, shorter screws were inserted from the medial sides of the bifid processes with a more vertical orientation.There was ventral cortex penetration in 11 screws without new neurological deficits. One of them was removed because of its fullthickness insertion into the spinal canal. The fusion rate was 75% in 16 patients who were radiologically followed for longer than6 months. In one patient out of 4 without fusion, the unilateral screw was loosened, and in others the laminar screws were notloosened.CONCLUSION: The laminar screw technique is easy, safe and effective at the C2, C7 and upper thoracic levels. Some modificationsmay be required due to the anatomical variations. It can be used at other subaxial levels, and also in selected cases where othertechniques could not be performed.