SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Open-door Laminoplasty with Preservation of Muscle Attachments of C2 and C7 for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Retrospective Study

Halil İbrahim SEÇER
Ferhat HARMAN
Murat Hamit AYTAR
Serdar KAHRAMAN
Pages
257–262
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Protection of the anatomic structures around the cervical spine such as the muscles and ligaments provides us better results regarding ROM and cervical axial pain

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Some restriction and complications, such as progression of kyphosis, incidence of axial neck pain and decrease of postoperative cervical range of motion are concern.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We designed this retrospective clinical study to evaluate the effect of laminoplasty by preserving the muscle attachments of C2 and C7 spinous processes on range of motion (ROM), axial neck pain and cervical lordosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Protection of the anatomic structures around the cervical spine such as the muscles and ligaments provides us better results regarding ROM and cervical axial pain
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: Some restriction and complications, such as progression of kyphosis, incidence of axial neck pain and decrease of postoperative cervical range of motion are concern. We designed this retrospective clinical study to evaluate the effect of laminoplasty by preserving the muscle attachments of C2 and C7 spinous processes on range of motion (ROM), axial neck pain and cervical lordosis. MATERIAL and METHODS: Twenty-seven cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy underwent open-door laminoplasty with the protection of muscle attachments to the C2 and C7 spinous process and laminae between 2007 and 2013. At the end of the followup, cases were evaluated with preoperative and postoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores, recovery rate, ROM, lordosis angle and visual analogue scale (VAS). Also, patients were divided into two groups and evaluated according to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, with or without T2 signal change. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66 years. The mean follow-up duration was 25 months. The postoperative mJOA scores were significantly higher than the preoperative mJOA scores (p 0.05). The postoperative lordosis angle was significantly lower than the preoperative lordosis angle (p<0.05). There were no significant differences regarding the postoperative lordosis angle, ROM and mJOA scores with or without T2 signal change on MRI. CONCLUSION: Protection of the anatomic structures around the cervical spine such as the muscles and ligaments provides us better results regarding ROM and cervical axial pain

🔖

Cite This Article

SEÇER, H. İ., HARMAN, F., AYTAR, M. H., KAHRAMAN, S. (2018). Open-door Laminoplasty with Preservation of Muscle Attachments of C2 and C7 for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Retrospective Study. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 257–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/404451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y: Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—Average 14-year follow-up study. Spine 31: 2998–3005, 2006 2. Duetzmann S, Cole T, Ratliff JK: Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: A systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 23(1): 24-34, 2015 3. Hale JJ, Gruson KI, Spivak JM: Laminoplasty: A review of its role in compressive cervical myelopathy. Spine J 6 Suppl 6: 289-298, 2006 4. Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, Pryor PW: Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 22(13): 1472-1480, 1997 5. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K: Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 13(7): 870-876, 1988 6. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K: Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359: 35-48, 1999 7. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y: Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8(7): 693-699, 1983 8. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Fujii R, Yoshikawa H: C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J 15:1375–1379, 2006 9. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H: En-bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles. J Neurosurg Spine 3: 29–33, 2005 10. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K: Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 21(17):1969- 1973, 1996 11. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K: Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: More than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 96 Suppl 2: 180-189, 2002 12. Izuka H, Shimizu T, Tateno K, Toda N, Edakuni H, Shimada H, Takagishi K: Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: Morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine 26: 2220-2226, 2001 13. Jackson R: The Cervical Syndrome, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1958:174 14. Japanese Orthopedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68: 490–503, 1994 15. Kaminsky SB, Clark CR, Traynelis VC: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up. Iowa Or