Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Board of Neurological Surgery

Pages
121–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In verbal exams, a total of 73 candidates participated,and 66 (90.4 %) of them were successful while 7 of them (9.6%) were unsuccessful.CONCLUSION: Board exams are inevitable to provide a certain level of education and standardization in the training of neurosurgery.Our duty as neurosurgeons is to participate in these exams and work to increase participation for continuing education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To provide information on the process and the results of the Turkish Board of Neurological Surgery and increase the relevantawareness.MATERIAL and METHODS: The number of applications to the written and oral board exams organized by the Turkish NeurosurgicalSociety Proficiency Board since 2006, the number of successful and unsuccessful participants, and the number of the neurosurgeryresidents and specialists who applied to the exam were evaluated.RESULTS: A total of 554 candidates took the exam since 2006 when the first TBNS was applied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two hundred and sixty of thecandidates were successful (46.9%), and 294 (53.1%) were unsuccessful.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In verbal exams, a total of 73 candidates participated,and 66 (90.4 %) of them were successful while 7 of them (9.6%) were unsuccessful.CONCLUSION: Board exams are inevitable to provide a certain level of education and standardization in the training of neurosurgery.Our duty as neurosurgeons is to participate in these exams and work to increase participation for continuing education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To provide information on the process and the results of the Turkish Board of Neurological Surgery and increase the relevantawareness.MATERIAL and METHODS: The number of applications to the written and oral board exams organized by the Turkish NeurosurgicalSociety Proficiency Board since 2006, the number of successful and unsuccessful participants, and the number of the neurosurgeryresidents and specialists who applied to the exam were evaluated.RESULTS: A total of 554 candidates took the exam since 2006 when the first TBNS was applied. Two hundred and sixty of thecandidates were successful (46.9%), and 294 (53.1%) were unsuccessful. Two hundred and forty six (44.4%) of those who took thetest were neurosurgeons, 308 (55.6%) were neurosurgery residents who had completed their 3rd year in their training. The highestscore in the written exams was 93/100, and the lowest score was 33/100. In verbal exams, a total of 73 candidates participated,and 66 (90.4 %) of them were successful while 7 of them (9.6%) were unsuccessful.CONCLUSION: Board exams are inevitable to provide a certain level of education and standardization in the training of neurosurgery.Our duty as neurosurgeons is to participate in these exams and work to increase participation for continuing education.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULDUK, E. B., YILMAZ, C. (2019). Turkish Board of Neurological Surgery. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 121–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/404428

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Baykul Y: Türklerde eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi (Özel Sayı):1-32, 2011 2. Cronbach LJ, Thorndike RL: Educational measurement. Test Validation: 443-507,1971 3. Demirer S: Yeterlik sınavları. Türk Tabipleri Birliği Ulusal Yeterlik Kurulu Bülteni: 1, 2013 4. Gasco J, Barber SM, McCutcheon IE, Black PM: Neurosurgery certification in member societies of the WFNS: Europe. World Neurosurgery 74(4): 375-386, 2010 5. Gasco J, Barber SM, Rangel-Castilla L, McCutcheon IE, Black PM: Neurosurgery certification in member societies of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS). The Americas. World Neurosurgery 74(1):16-27, 2010 6. Haase, J: The European examination-its present status and potential development. In: Training in Neurosurgery in the Countries of the EU. Vienna: Springer, 2004: 107-114 7. Hoff JT, Eisenberg HM: Assessment of training progress and examinations. In: Training in Neurosurgery. Vienna: Springer, 1997:83-88 8. Pickard JD: Experience with the United Kingdom examinations in neurosurgery. In: Training in Neurosurgery. Vienna: Springer, 1997:93-97 9. Rhodes, RS: Maintenance of certification. The American Surgeon 73:143-147, 2007 10. Sayek İ, Aslan D: Ulusal Yeterlik Kurulu nedir? Türkiye’de güncel durum paylaşımı. Türk Tabipleri Birliği Ulusal Yeterlik Kurulu Bülteni: 1, 2013 11. Available at:http://www.turknorosirurji.org.tr/TNYK/file/TNYK_ tuzuk_31032017.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2017