Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Change of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters after Selective and Non-Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Pages
77–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that the long-term studies to be done in this regard will increasingly require the necessity of keeping the pelvis inmind while evaluating the sagittal plan in AIS surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To compare the postoperative changes of both sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters in patients with Lenke Type 1adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent selective and non-selective fusion surgery.MATERIAL and METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among 53 Lenke Type 1 AIS patients who underwent correctivesurgery at our centre between 2006 and 2012.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were classified as group 1 if they underwent selective surgery and as group 2if they underwent non-selective surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that the long-term studies to be done in this regard will increasingly require the necessity of keeping the pelvis inmind while evaluating the sagittal plan in AIS surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To compare the postoperative changes of both sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters in patients with Lenke Type 1adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent selective and non-selective fusion surgery.MATERIAL and METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among 53 Lenke Type 1 AIS patients who underwent correctivesurgery at our centre between 2006 and 2012. Patients were classified as group 1 if they underwent selective surgery and as group 2if they underwent non-selective surgery. Surgical results of preoperative and postoperative sagittal and spinopelvic measurements,pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) values were analysed usingthe SURGIMAP© Software (Nemaris İnc. USA) measurement system.RESULTS: In both groups, a comparison of pre- and postoperative sagittal spinal parameters did not show a statistically significantdifference. In both groups, pre- and postoperative measurements of LL and TK did not show a statistically significant difference.CONCLUSION: After selective and non-selective surgery, sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters are not affected in the middleterm. We think that the long-term studies to be done in this regard will increasingly require the necessity of keeping the pelvis inmind while evaluating the sagittal plan in AIS surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARGIN, D., TURK, O. I., ALBAYRAK, A., BAYHAN, I. A., KAYGUSUZ, M. A. (2019). Change of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters after Selective and Non-Selective Fusion in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 77–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/404414

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Atici Y, Balioglu MB, Albayrak A, Kargin D, Atici A, Akman YE: The sagittal plane analysis of spine. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery 25:149-154, 2014 2. Bernstein PB, Hentschel S, Platzek I, Hühne S, Ettrich U, Hartmann A, Seifert J: Thoracal flat back is a risk factor for lumbar disc degeneration after scoliosis surgery. Spine J 14:925-932, 2013 3. Celestre PC, Carreon LY, Lenke LG, Sucato DJ, Glassman SD: Sagittal alignment two years after selective and nonselective thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 3(6):560-565, 2015 4. Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P: A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20(4):451-462, 1992 5. Farshad M, Catanzaro S, Schmid SL: The spinopelvic geometry in different Lenke curve types of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 4(6):425-431, 2016 6. La Maida GA, Zottarelli L, Mineo GV, Misaggi B: Sagittal balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Radiographic study of spino-pelvic compensation after surgery. Eur Spine J 22 Suppl 6:859-867, 2013 7. Larson AN, Fletcher ND, Daniel C, Richards BS: Lumbar curve is stable after selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A 20 year follow-up. Spine 37:833–839, 2012 8. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C: Pelvic incidence: A fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99-103, 1998 9. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Haher TR, Lapp MA, Merola AA, Harms J, Shufflebarger HL: Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine 26(21): 2347-2353, 2001 10. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 83:1169-1181, 2001 11. Liu T, Hai Y: Sagittal plane analysis of selective posterior thoracic spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A comparison study of all pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(5):277-282, 2014 12. Ries Z, Harpole B, Graves C, Gnanapragasam G, Larson N, Weintstein S, Mendoza-Lattes SA: Selective thoracic fusion of Lenke I and II curves affects sagittal profiles but not sagittal or spinopelvic alignment. Spine 40(12):926-934, 2015 13. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, B