Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Distortion and Targeting Errors from Strong Rare Earth Metal Magnetic Dental Implant Requiring Revision

Pages
134–140
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings should be consideredwhen reviewing surgical precautions and making distortion-detection algorithm improvements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, the use of magnetic dental implants has been re-popularized with the introduction of strong rare earth metal, for example,neodymium, magnets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 62-year-old man underwent deep brain stimulation formedically insufficiently controlled Parkinson’s disease.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings should be consideredwhen reviewing surgical precautions and making distortion-detection algorithm improvements.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Recently, the use of magnetic dental implants has been re-popularized with the introduction of strong rare earth metal, for example,neodymium, magnets. Unrecognized magnetic dental implants can cause critical magnetic resonance image distortions. We reporta case involving surgical failure caused by a magnetic dental implant. A 62-year-old man underwent deep brain stimulation formedically insufficiently controlled Parkinson’s disease. Stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging performed for the first deep brainstimulation showed that the overdenture was removed. However, a dental implant remained and contained a neodymium magnet,which was unrecognized at the time of imaging; the magnet caused localized non-linear distortions that were the largest around thedental magnets. In the magnetic field, the subthalamic area was distorted by a 4.6 mm right shift and counter clockwise rotation.However, distortions were visually subtle in the operation field and small for distant stereotactic markers, with approximately 1–2mm distortions. The surgeon considered the distortion to be normal asymmetry or variation. Stereotactic marker distortion wascalculated to be in the acceptable range in the surgical planning software. Targeting errors, approximately 5 mm on the right sideand 2 mm on the left side, occurred postoperatively. Both leads were revised after the removal of dental magnets. Dental magnetsmay cause surgical failures and should be checked and removed before stereotactic surgery. Our findings should be consideredwhen reviewing surgical precautions and making distortion-detection algorithm improvements.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARK, S. C., LEE, C. S., KIM, S. M., CHOI, E. J., LEE, D. H., LEE, J. K. (2019). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Distortion and Targeting Errors from Strong Rare Earth Metal Magnetic Dental Implant Requiring Revision. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 134–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/404375

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Bejjani BP, Dormont D, Pidoux B, Yelnik J, Damier P, Arnulf I, Bonnet AM, Marsault C, Agid Y, Philippon J, Cornu P: Bilateral subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease by using three-dimensional stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological guidance. J Neurosurg 92:615-625, 2000 2. Ceruti P, Bryant SR, Lee JH, MacEntee MI: Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: Review and 1-year clinical report. J Can Dent Assoc 76:a52, 2010 3. Costa AL, Appenzeller S, Yasuda CL, Pereira FR, Zanardi VA, Cendes F: Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14:E278-282, 2009 4. Derrey S, Maltete D, Chastan N, Debono B, Proust F, Gerardin E, Weber J, Mihout B, Freger P: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: Usefulness of intraoperative radiological guidance. The Stereoplan. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:351-358, 2008 5. Fiegele T, Feuchtner G, Sohm F, Bauer R, Anton JV, Gotwald T, Twerdy K, Eisner W: Accuracy of stereotactic electrode placement in deep brain stimulation by intraoperative computed tomography. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 14:595- 599, 2008 6. Foltynie T, Zrinzo L, Martinez-Torres I, Tripoliti E, Petersen E, Holl E, Aviles-Olmos I, Jahanshahi M, Hariz M, Limousin P: MRI-guided STN DBS in Parkinson’s disease without microelectrode recording: Efficacy and safety. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82:358-363, 2011 7. Gonda T,Maeda Y: Why are magnetic attachments popular in Japan and other Asian countries? Japanese Dental Science Review 47:124-130, 2011 8. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT: Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:396-404, 2004 9. Holl EM, Petersen EA, Foltynie T, Martinez-Torres I, Limousin P, Hariz MI, Zrinzo L: Improving targeting in image-guided frame-based deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 67:437- 447, 2010 10. Jones N: Materials science: The pull of stronger magnets. Nature 472:22-23, 2011 11. Kondziolka D, Dempsey PK, Lunsford LD, Kestle JR, Dolan EJ, Kanal E, Tasker RR: A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for stereotactic coordinate determination. Neurosurgery 30:402- 406; discussion 406-407, 1992 12. Martinez-Martin P, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Forjaz MJ, de Pedro J, Spanish-American Longitudinal PDPSG: The clinical impression of severity index for Parkinson’s disease: International validation