Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6

Radiological Imaging Findings of Craniofacial Fibrous Dysplasia

Pages
799–807
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Craniofacial FDs could be of different types on radiological examinations depending upon their compositions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To present the radiological findings of fibrous dysplasia (FD) patients who had computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS: This study included a total of 25 patients (17 female and 8 male) who were found to have FD based on CT examinations between March 2010 and July 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Craniofacial FDs could be of different types on radiological examinations depending upon their compositions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To present the radiological findings of fibrous dysplasia (FD) patients who had computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. MATERIAL and METHODS: This study included a total of 25 patients (17 female and 8 male) who were found to have FD based on CT examinations between March 2010 and July 2018. Involved bones, type of involvement (single or multiple) and CT appearance features (ground-glass, sclerotic, cystic or mixed type) were evaluated.RESULTS: Age range of the patients with FD was 14-55 (mean: 29.92 ± 12.63) years. Sixteen patients had single bone and nine patients had multiple bones affected. Single bone most frequently involved maxillary bones. Multiple bone involvement affected up to four bones, sphenoid bone being the most frequent. Fifteen lesions were mixed type, eight were ground-glass and two were sclerotic on CT. Intense contrast-enhancement was observed in four patients on MRI.CONCLUSION: Craniofacial FD is more frequent in young adults and women, and more commonly involves single bone, mostly maxillary and sphenoid bones. Craniofacial FDs could be of different types on radiological examinations depending upon their compositions.

🔖

Cite This Article

GOKCE, E., BEYHAN, M. (2020). Radiological Imaging Findings of Craniofacial Fibrous Dysplasia. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6, 799–807. https://ajindex.com/articles/404347

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Atalar M, Ozum U: Monostotic fibrous dysplasia of the clivus: Imaging findings. Turk Neurosurg 20:77-81, 2010 2. Atalar MH, Salk I, Savas R, Uysal IO, Egilmez H: CT and MR imaging in a large series of patients with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Pol J Radiol 4:232-240, 2015 3. Brown EW, Megerian CA, McKenna MJ, Weber A: Fibrousdysplasia of the temporal bone: Imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 164: 679-682, 1995 4. Chen YR, Chang CN, Tan YC: Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: An update. Chang Gung Med J 29:543-549, 2006 5. Chen YR, Wong FH, Hsueh C, Lo LJ: Computed tomography characteristics of non-syndromic crani of acial fibrous dysplasia. Chang Gung Med J 25:1-8, 2002 6. Chong VF, Khoo JB, Fan YF: Fibrous dysplasia involving the base of the skull. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178: 717-720, 2002 7. Cruz AA, Constanzi M, de Castro FA, dos Santos AC: Apical involvement with fibrous dysplasia: Implications for vision. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 23:450-454, 2007 8. Eisenberg RL: Bubblylesions of bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193: W79-94, 2009 9. Giordano F, Serio P, Savasta S, Oliveri G, Genitori L: Craniofacial surgery in fibrousdysplasia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 19 Suppl 2:595-604, 2006 10. Grabias SL, Campbell CJ: Fibrousdysplasia. Orthop Clin North Am 8:771-783, 1997 11. Gupta A, Mehta VS, Sarkar C: Largecystic fibrous dysplasia of thetemporal bone: Case report and review of literature. J Clin Neurosci 10: 364-367, 2003 12. Hanifi B, Samil KS, Yasar C, Cengiz C, Ercan A, Ramazan D: Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Clin Imaging 37:1109-1115, 2013 13. Ilica AT, Mossa-Basha M, Zan E, Vikani A, Pillai JJ, Gujar S, Aygun N, Izbudak I: Cranial intraosseous meningioma: Spectrum of neuro imaging findings with respect to histopathological grades in 65 patients. Clin Imaging 38(5):599-604, 2014 14. Iwasko N, Steinbach LS, Disler D, Pathria M, Hottya GA, Kattapuram S, Varma DG, Kumar R: Imaging findings in Mazabraud’s syndrome: Seven newcases. Skeletal Radiol 31: 81-87, 2002 15. Jee W, Choi K, Choe BY, Park JM, Shinn KS: Fibrous dysplasia: MR imaging characteristics with radiopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1523-1527, 1996 16. Khalil HS, Toynton S, Steventon N, Adams W, Gibson J: Radiological difficulties in the diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia of the sphenoid sinus and the cranial base. Rhinology 39: 49- 51, 2001 17. Kim E: Fibrous dysplasia of the clivus. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48: 441-444, 2010 18. Kose TE, Dincer Kose O, Erdem MA, Cankaya AB, Ozcan Duman I: