Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6

Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization for Direct Repair of Bilateral L5 Pars Interarticularis Defect: Dynamic Assessment of Pars Fusion

Pages
923–931
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, when there is no significant instability, patients with spondylolysis can be treated with posterior dynamic stabilization techniques with satisfactory clinical and radiological results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To evaluate the satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior dynamic stabilization for the direct repair of bilateral L5 pars interarticularis defects and pars fusion.MATERIAL and METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of postoperative follow-up results of 13 patients with bilateral L5 pars interarticularis defects without spondylolisthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients underwent dynamic transpedicular stabilization between 2013 and 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, when there is no significant instability, patients with spondylolysis can be treated with posterior dynamic stabilization techniques with satisfactory clinical and radiological results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To evaluate the satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior dynamic stabilization for the direct repair of bilateral L5 pars interarticularis defects and pars fusion.MATERIAL and METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of postoperative follow-up results of 13 patients with bilateral L5 pars interarticularis defects without spondylolisthesis. The patients underwent dynamic transpedicular stabilization between 2013 and 2018. Our surgical criteria included unilateral or bilateral L5 spondylolysis; excessive low back pain; low back pain accompanied by leg pain without neurological findings; symptoms lasting at least six months despite conservative treatments, age <50 years; and lack of significant adjacent disc degeneration.RESULTS: There were seven female and six male patients with a mean age of 38.9 years. All patients achieved satisfactory postoperative results during a mean follow-up period of 22 months. Preoperative visual analog scale score and Oswestry Disability Index value were 8.85 ± 0.69 and 54.46 ± 7.62, respectively, which decreased to 1.31 ± 0.48 and 9.85 ± 3.51, respectively, at the postoperative 24th month. In all patients, the bony fusion of the pars interarticularis at the stabilized segment was confirmed on the computed tomography scan at an average of 22 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The posterior dynamic system ensures that the spine moves within physiological limits and carries the load by sharing it with the spine. The advantages of direct pars repair using our technique are the restoration of the posterior structures’ normal anatomy, protection of the functional mobility segment, and early functional recovery without degeneration in the adjacent segment. Therefore, when there is no significant instability, patients with spondylolysis can be treated with posterior dynamic stabilization techniques with satisfactory clinical and radiological results.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIBICI, K., EROK, B. (2020). Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization for Direct Repair of Bilateral L5 Pars Interarticularis Defect: Dynamic Assessment of Pars Fusion. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 6, 923–931. https://ajindex.com/articles/404304

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Benezech J, Garlenq B, Larroque G: Flexible stabilisation of the degenerative lumbar spine using PEEK rods. Adv Orthop 2016:7369409, 2016 2. Berquist TH: Imaging of the postoperative spine. Radiol Clin N Am 44:407-418, 2006 3. Bordes-Monmeneu M, Bordes-Garcia V, Rodrigo-Baeza F, Saéz D: System of dynamic neutralization in the lumbar spine: Experience on 94 cases. Neurocirugia (Astur) 16:499-506, 2005 4. Bradford DS, Iza J: Repair of the defect in spondylolysis or minimal degrees of spondylolisthesis by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Spine 10:673-679, 1985 5. Brooks BK, Southam SL, Mlady GW, Logan J, Rosett M: Lumbar spine spondylolysis in the adult population: Using computed tomography to evaluate the possibility of adult onset lumbar spondylosis as a cause of back pain. Skeletal Radiol 39(7):669-673, 2010 6. Buck JE: Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52(3):432-437,1970 7. Erbulut D: “Kinematical and load sharing effect of a novel posterior dynamic stabilization system implanted in lumbar spine” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, Gaines ville, Fla, USA, August 2012. 8. Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, Yuan HA, Lubicky JP: The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(5):699-707, 1984 9. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ: A comparison of a modified oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability scale. Phys Ther 81:776-788, 2001 10. Geissele AE, Ryan JB, Van Dam BE: Treatment of traumatic spondylolysis by amodified Scott technique. AAOS, 57th Annual Meeting, 1990 11. Invibio Spine. PEEK-OPTIMA® Spinal Rods: A retrospective clinical study. 12. Iwamoto J, Abe H, Tsukimura Y, Wakano K: Relationship between radiographic abnormalities of lumbar spine and incidence of low back pain in high school rugby players: A prospective study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 15(3):163-168, 2005 13. Kaner T, Dalbayrak S, Oktenoglu T, Sasani M, Aydin AL, Ozer AF: Comparison of posterior dynamic and posterior rigid transpedicular stabilization with fusion to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthopedics 33(5), 2010 14. Kaya S, Karakose S, Onder H: A rare case: Titanium hypersensitivity. Van Tıp Derg 24(4):359-360, 2017 15. Khan SA, Sattar A, Khanzada U, Adel H, Adil SO, Hussain M: Facture of the pars interarticularis with or without spondylolisthesis in an adult populati