Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5

Interobserver Variability in Mitotic Count for Meningioma Grading: How Can We Reduce It?

Pages
643–650
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Interobserver variability in mitotic figure counting can be reduced by full scan method, and examining the hematoxylin andeosin stained slides by the full scan method helps us to determine the true histologic grade of meningiomas in most cases, whowould receive an additional treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To evaluate the interobserver variability in determining the number of mitoses in 10 high-power field (HPF) and thus the tumorgrade, and to investigate how to reduce grade discordance between the observers and the most useful method to identify thepatients who would receive an additional treatment.MATERIAL and METHODS: Two hundred and seventy cases with meningioma were re-evaluated by three experienced pathologistsand five senior residents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They determined the number of mitotic figures in 10 HPF in each slide.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Interobserver variability in mitotic figure counting can be reduced by full scan method, and examining the hematoxylin andeosin stained slides by the full scan method helps us to determine the true histologic grade of meningiomas in most cases, whowould receive an additional treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To evaluate the interobserver variability in determining the number of mitoses in 10 high-power field (HPF) and thus the tumorgrade, and to investigate how to reduce grade discordance between the observers and the most useful method to identify thepatients who would receive an additional treatment.MATERIAL and METHODS: Two hundred and seventy cases with meningioma were re-evaluated by three experienced pathologistsand five senior residents. They determined the number of mitotic figures in 10 HPF in each slide. Re-evaluation of the cases, whichwere found of different grades from the reference observers was requested by full scan method. Statistical analysis was performedby using SPSS V23.0.RESULTS: A moderate agreement was found between the observers and the reference observer. After the evaluation of mitoticactivity with the full scan method, the mean numbers of mitoses found by the observers in 10 HPF were increased. In the firstevaluation, 4–6 cases were defined as Grade II by the observers. Whereas, 23–27 cases were defined as Grade II after the full scanmethod.CONCLUSION: If there are less than 16 mitotic figures throughout the slide, it is more difficult to find the 10 HPF including 4 or moremitosis. Interobserver variability in mitotic figure counting can be reduced by full scan method, and examining the hematoxylin andeosin stained slides by the full scan method helps us to determine the true histologic grade of meningiomas in most cases, whowould receive an additional treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYGIN, İ., ÇAKIR, E., ERCİN, M. E. (2020). Interobserver Variability in Mitotic Count for Meningioma Grading: How Can We Reduce It?. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5, 643–650. https://ajindex.com/articles/404288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Backer-Grøndahl T, Moen BH, Torp SH. The histopathological spectrum of human meningiomas. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 5(3):231-242, 2012 2. Colman H, Giannini C, Huang L, Gonzalez J, Hess K, Bruner J, Fuller G, Langford L, Pelloski C, Aaron J et al. “Assessment and prognostic significance of mitotic index using the mitosis marker phospho-histone h3 in low and intermediate-grade infiltrating astrocytomas,” Am J Surg Pathol 30(5):657-664, 2006 3. Commins DL, Atkinson RD, Burnett ME: Review of meningioma histopathology. Neurosurg Focus 23(4):3-9, 2007 4. Duregon E, Cassenti A, Pittaro A, Ventura L, Senetta R, Ruda R, Cassoni P: Better see to better agree: Phosphohistone H3 increases interobserver agreement in mitotic count for meningioma grading and imposes new specific thresholds. Neuro Oncol 17(5):663-669, 2015 5. Gallagher MJ, Jenkinson MD, Brodbelt AR, Mills SJ, Chavredakis E: WHO grade 1 meningioma recurrence: Are location and Simpson grade still relevant? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 141:117-121, 2016 6. Gousias K, Schramm J, Simon M: The Simpson grading revisited: Aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management. J Neurosurg 125:551-560, 2016 7. Ho DM, Hsu CY, Ting LT, Chiang H: Histopathology and MIB-1 labeling index predicted recurrence of meningiomas: A proposal of diagnostic criteria for patients with atypical meningioma. Cancer 94:1538-1547, 2002 8. Kim YJ, Ketter R, Steudel WI, Feiden W: Prognostic significance of the mitotic index using the mitosis marker anti phosphohistone H3 in meningiomas. Am J Clin Pathol 128:118-125, 2007 9. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, FigarellaBranger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW: The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803-820, 2016 10. Moradi A, Semnani V, Djam H, Tajodini A, Zali AR, Ghaemi K, Nikzad N, Madani-Civi M: Pathodiagnostic parameters for meningioma grading. J Clin Neurosci 15(12):1370-1375, 2008 11. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS: CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro Oncol 17 Suppl 4:iv1-iv62, 2015 12. Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, Suman VJ, Lohse CM: Meningioma grading: An analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 21(12):1455-1465, 1997 13. Randolph JJ: Online Kappa Calculator (Computer soft