Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

Risk factors for fistula recurrence after urethrocutaneous fistulectomy in children with hypospadias

Pages
237–241
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The overall success rate of primary urethrocutaneous fistulectomy was 81.0% (51/63 children).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of fistula recurrence after primary urethrocutaneous fistulectomy in children with hypospadias.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: The study included 63 children who underwent fistulectomy for urethrocutaneous fistula (UCFs) that occurred after urethroplasty for hypospadias, between February 2009 and December 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The overall success rate of primary urethrocutaneous fistulectomy was 81.0% (51/63 children).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of fistula recurrence after primary urethrocutaneous fistulectomy in children with hypospadias. Material and methods: The study included 63 children who underwent fistulectomy for urethrocutaneous fistula (UCFs) that occurred after urethroplasty for hypospadias, between February 2009 and December 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups: successful group 1 and failed group 2. For data analysis, we included the demographics of the patients, the details of the previous urethroplasty (the type of hypospadias and the location of the meatus after complete chordectomy), the presence of meatal stenosis or urethral stricture after urethroplasty, and the size of the UCFs. The Student t-test and the chi-square test were performed to analyze the data using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software. Results: The overall success rate of primary urethrocutaneous fistulectomy was 81.0% (51/63 children). The most common location of a secondary fistula was the penoscrotal area 5 (41.6%). There were no statistically significant differences in age (p=0.501), weight (p=0.063), body mass index (p=0.924), history of low birth weight (p=0.454), and history of prematurity (p=0.381). The type of hypospadias (p=0.007) and urethral defect length (p=0.021) were identified as independent risk factors for failed urethrocutaneous fistulectomy. There were no statistically significant differences in meatal stenosis (p=0.431), postoperative stricture (p=0.587), fistula location (p=0.173), multiplicity (p=0.588), and fistula size (p=0.530). Conclusion: The type of hypospadias and the length of the urethral defect are the significant risk factors for secondary fistula recurrence after primary urethrocutaneous fistulectomy.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDULLAEV, Z., AGZAMKHODJAEV, S., CHUNG, J. M., LEE, S. D. (2021). Risk factors for fistula recurrence after urethrocutaneous fistulectomy in children with hypospadias. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 237–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/404219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yu X, Nassar N, Mastroiacovo P, Canfield M, Groisman B. Hypospadias Prevalence and Trends in International Birth Defect Surveillance Systems, 1980-2010. Eur Urol 2019
  2. [Crossref] 2. Kallgn B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, Martinez-Frias M, et al. A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias. Acta Paediatr Scan Suppl 1986
  3. [Crossref] 3. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male external genitalia. Lancet 1985
  4. [Crossref] 4. Fisch H, Hyun G, Hensle TW. Rising hypospadias rates: disproving a myth. J Pediatr Urol 2010
  5. [Crossref] 5. Dokter EM, Mouës CM, Rooij IA, Biezen JJ. Complications after Hypospadias Correction: Prognostic Factors and Impact on Final Clinical Outcome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2018
  6. [Crossref] 6. Yildiz T, Tahtali IN, Ates DC, Keles I, Ilce Z. Age of patient is a risk factor for urethrocutaneous fistula in hypospadias surgery. J Pediatr Urol 2013
  7. [Crossref] 7. Richter F, Pinto PA, Stock JA, Hanna MK. Management of recurrent urethral fistulas after hypospadias repair. Urology 2003
  8. [Crossref] 8. Elbakry A. Management of urethrocutaneous fistulae after hypospadias repair: 10 years’ experience. BJU Int 2001
  9. [Crossref] 9. Gite VA, Patil SR, Bote SM, Siddiqui MAKN, Nikose JV, Kandi AJ. Durham Smith Vest-Over-Pant Technique: Simple Procedure for a Complex Problem (Post-Hypospadias Repair Fistula). Urol Int 2017
  10. [Crossref] 10. Muruganandham K, Ansari MS, Dubey D. Urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: outcome of three types of closure techniques. Pediatr Surg Int 2010
  11. [Crossref] 11. Srivastava RK, Tandale MS, Panse N, Gupta A, Sahane P. Management of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery - An experience of thirty-five cases. Indian J Plast Surg 2011
  12. [Crossref] 12. Mohamed S, Mohamed N, Esmael T, Khaled S. A simple procedure for management of urethrocutaneous fistulas
  13. post-hypospadias repair. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2010
  14. [Crossref] 13. Holland AJ, Abubacker M, Smith GH, Cass DT. Management of urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int 2008
  15. [Crossref] 14. Shapiro SR. Fistula repair. Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery of the External Genitalia, Adult and Pediatric. Chapter 27. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1999.p.132-5. 15. Neilson AG, Nicholls G. Repair of hypospadias fistula using a penile skin advancement flap with penile