Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Contamination of Low Frictional Elastomeric Ligatures by Streptococcus mutans: A Prospective RT-PCR and AFM Study

Pages
163–169
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ring shaped low-friction elastomeric ligatures were not different from the steel ligature in terms of S. mutans colonization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare Streptococcus mutans colonization between low-friction elastomeric ligatures and to correlate microbial colo nization levels with the surface roughness status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 160 premolars of 10 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ring shaped low-friction elastomeric ligatures were not different from the steel ligature in terms of S. mutans colonization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare Streptococcus mutans colonization between low-friction elastomeric ligatures and to correlate microbial colo nization levels with the surface roughness status. Methods: The study included 160 premolars of 10 patients. During the study period, which consisted of 4 sessions each lasting 4 weeks, the ligature types Slide™ Low-Friction Ligature (Leone, Firenze, Italy), Tough-O Energy™ (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Den ver, USA), and Sili Ties™ (Dentsply Sirona, Surrey KT13 0NY, UK), and steel ligatures (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, USA) as a control, were fixed to the premolar teeth by clockwise rotation among the jaw quadrants. The plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were obtained before bonding (T0), 6 weeks after bonding (T1), and subsequently every 4 weeks (T2, T3, T4). Presence of S. mutans was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction at T1, T2, T3, T4. Surface roughness was evaluated with Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) before ligation (Ra0) and after (Ra1) ligation. The paired t-test, ANOVA, repeated measures of ANOVA, and the Kruskal–Wallis test were used for the statistical analysis. Results: S. mutans colonization was significantly higher on the Slide group (P .05). Conclusion: S. mutans colonization showed variations in low-friction elastomeric ligatures independent of surface roughness. Ring shaped low-friction elastomeric ligatures were not different from the steel ligature in terms of S. mutans colonization.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAGDEVIREN, C., GÜLEÇ, A., EKŞİ, F., SAGLAM, M., KAHRAMAN, M. (2021). Contamination of Low Frictional Elastomeric Ligatures by Streptococcus mutans: A Prospective RT-PCR and AFM Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 163–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/403477

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Petti S, Barbato E, Simonetti D’Arca A. Effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed and removable appliances on oral microbiota: A sixmonth longitudinal study. New Microbiol. 1997;20(1):55-62
  2. Papaioannou W, Gizani S, Nassika M, Kontou E, Nakou M. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different types of brackets. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):1090-1095. [CrossRef] 3. Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(2):188-194. [CrossRef] 4. Ren Y, Jongsma MA, Mei L, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation--a potential public health threat? Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(7):1711-1718. [CrossRef] 5. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances--an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992;19(3):199-205. [CrossRef] 6. Beyth N, Redlich M, Harari D, Friedman M, Steinberg D. Effect of sustained-release chlorhexidine varnish on Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(3):345-348. [CrossRef] 7. van Houte J. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res. 1994;73(3):672-681. [CrossRef] 8. Baccetti T, Franchi L. Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(2):211-216. [CrossRef] 9. Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, Thunold K, Selvig KA. Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(5):475-484. [CrossRef] 10. Alves de Souza R, Borges de Araújo Magnani MB, Nouer DF et al. Periodontal and microbiologic evaluation of 2 methods of archwire ligation: ligature wires and elastomeric rings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):506-512. [CrossRef] 11. Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO, Bozkurt FY et al. Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in or (doi thodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(2):231-236. [CrossRef] 12. Singh A, Varshney S, Varshney K et al. Microbial colonization around orthodontic ligature ties: an in-vivo study. APOS Trends Orthod. 2013;3(3):72. [CrossRef] 13. Akgun OM, Altug H, Karacay S et al. Effect of 2 elastomeric ligatures on microbial flora and periodontal status in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or