Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Diagnostic Evaluation of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children

Pages
49–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important factor in the decision to perform bronchoscopy is the evaluation of radiological findings together with physical examination and history.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the place of clinical symptoms and findings, and radiological imaging in the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children, and to investigate the validity of existing diagnostic algorithms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The medical records of 120 children with a diagnosis of FBA who underwent rigid bronchoscopy were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important factor in the decision to perform bronchoscopy is the evaluation of radiological findings together with physical examination and history.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the place of clinical symptoms and findings, and radiological imaging in the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children, and to investigate the validity of existing diagnostic algorithms. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 120 children with a diagnosis of FBA who underwent rigid bronchoscopy were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of the parameters used in the diagnosis of FBA and their predictive values were calculated. Results: 78.9% of the patients were younger than 3 years and 63.8% were male. The peak incidence was 18 months. The rate of negative bronchoscopy was 30.8% and 87.3% of these patients were younger than 3 years. It was observed that the value with the highest diagnostical sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy (DA) rate (sensitivity; 92.54% and DA; 85.7%) had positivity for any of the radiological findings, and among these, there was the detection of one-sided excessive ventilation on chest X-ray (sensitivity; 70.0% and DA; 70.01%). Patients with positivity of any of the radiological findings who additionally had wheezing together with cyanosis or dyspnea had 100% specificity. Conclusion: Particularly male children under the age of 3 years have an increased risk of FBA. Neither clinical symptoms nor radiological findings alone are sufficiently specific and sensitive in the diagnosis of FBA. The most important factor in the decision to perform bronchoscopy is the evaluation of radiological findings together with physical examination and history.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, A. O., ETENSEL, B., YAZICI, M., ÖZKISACIK, S. (2021). Diagnostic Evaluation of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 49–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/403226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Brkic F, Umihanic S. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children. Experience at ORL clinic Tuzla, 1954-2004. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71:909-15
  2. Paksu S, Paksu MS, Kilic M, et al. Foreign body aspiration in childhood: evaluation of diagnostic parameters. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28:259-64
  3. Skoulakis CE, Doxas PG, Papadakis CE, et al. Bronchoscopy for foreign body removal in children. A review and analysis of 210 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 53:143-8
  4. Black RE, Johnson DG, Matlak ME. Bronchoscopic removal of aspirated foreign bodies in children. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29:682- 4
  5. Latifi X, Mustafa A, Hysenaj Q. Rigid tracheobronchoscopy in the management of airway foreign bodies: 10 years experience in Kosovo. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70:2055-9
  6. Ciftci AO, Bingol-Kologlu M, Senocak ME, Tanyel FC, Büyükpamukçu N. Bronchoscopy for evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38:1170-6
  7. Metrangelo S, Monetti C, Meneghini L, Zadra N, Giusti F. Eight years’ experience with foreign-body aspiration in children: what is really important for a timely diagnosis? J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34:1229-31
  8. Chiu CY, Wong KS, Lai SH, Wu CT. Factors predicting early diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2005; 21:161-4
  9. Etensel B, Erdem AO, Özkisacık S, Çoşkun Ö, Gürsoy MH. Current approaches to foreign body aspiration in children in the light of 8 years of clinical experience. Van Med J 2015; 22:90-5
  10. Even L, Heno N, Talmon Y, Zonis Z, Kugelman A. Diagnostic evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40:1122-7
  11. Schmidt H, Manegold BC. Foreign body aspiration in children. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:644-8
  12. Oncel M, Sunam GS, Ceran S. Tracheobronchial aspiration of foreign bodies and rigid bronchoscopy in children. Pediatr Int 2012; 54:532-5
  13. Gang W, Zhengxia P, Hongbo L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in 1024 children. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47:2004-10
  14. Adjeso T, Damah MC, Murphy JP, Anyomih TTK. foreign body aspiration in northern ghana: a review of pediatric patients. Int J Otolaryngol 2017; 2017:1478795
  15. Bolliger CT Mathur PN.Prog Respir Res. Basel, Karger. Interventional Bronchoscopy. Cape Town; 2000:96-107
  16. Lukse R, Winter RC, Pollock AN. Metallic foreign body aspiration: case of a blowgun dart in the left main stem bronchus. Pediatr Emerg Care 2014; 30:5