Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Mandibular Anterior Region for Application of Orthodontic Mini-Screws

Pages
102–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the results recommend the application of mini-screws with 1.3-1.7 mm diameter and 5-7 mm length.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the proper zones for placement of orthodontic mini-screws, based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements in the anterior mandibular region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The current cross-sectional study was performed on CBCT images of 77 individuals in the age range of 18-60 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the results recommend the application of mini-screws with 1.3-1.7 mm diameter and 5-7 mm length.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To determine the proper zones for placement of orthodontic mini-screws, based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements in the anterior mandibular region. Methods: The current cross-sectional study was performed on CBCT images of 77 individuals in the age range of 18-60 years. Axial slices at the levels of 2, 5, and 8 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the mandibular anterior teeth were selected. Interdental distances were measured in the mesiodistal direction, parallel to the midline of the mandibular arch. Areas with more suitable width were investigated for measuring the minimum interdental space. On the reconstructed cross-sectional images, labiolingual thickness of the bone was measured at the levels of 2, 5, 8, and 11 mm from the CEJ. The Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney test with Bonferroni correction, Welch test, and Tukey’s multiple analogy test were used to analyze the data. Results: Mesiodistal and labiolingual distances between the roots in every measured region had the highest values at the levels of 8 and 11 mm from the CEJ. The highest measured values were related to the interdental region between the lateral incisor and canine teeth on both sides of the arch. There were no statistically significant differences between these values (P < .001). Conclusion: The lateral incisor–canine areas at the level of 8 mm from the CEJ are introduced as the optimal sites for placement of orthodontic mini-screws. In addition, the results recommend the application of mini-screws with 1.3-1.7 mm diameter and 5-7 mm length.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHALCHİ, M., KAJAN, Z. D., SHABANİ, M., KHOSRAVİFARD, N., KHABBAZ, S., KHAKSARİ, F. (2021). Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Mandibular Anterior Region for Application of Orthodontic Mini-Screws. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 102–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/403055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cornelis MA, Scheffler NR, Mahy P et al. Modified miniplates for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: Placement and removal Surgeries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008
  2. 66(7):1439-1445. [CrossRef] 2. Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007
  3. 22(5):779-784. (doi: [CrossRef]) 3. Dalstra M, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. Load transfer of mini-screws for orthodontic anchorage. Orthodontics. 2004
  4. Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for miniimplant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009
  5. 136(2):230- 235. [CrossRef] 5. Baumgaertel S. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone width and cortical bone thickness for mini-screw placement in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009
  6. 136(1):104-108. [CrossRef] 6. Baumgaertel S. Cortical bone thickness and bone width of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-screw insertion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011
  7. 140(6):806-811. [CrossRef] 7. Baumgaertel S. Planning and placing temporary anchorage devices (TADs) with the aid of CBCT imaging. In: Kapila S, ed. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Indications, Insights, and Innovations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell
  8. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T et al. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007
  9. 131(4)(suppl):S68-S73. [CrossRef] 9. Asscherickx K, Vande Vannet B, Wehrbein H, Sabzevar MM. Success rate of mini-screws relative to their position to adjacent roots. Eur J Orthod. 2008
  10. 30(4):330-335. [CrossRef] 10. Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018
  11. 153(4):505-511. [CrossRef] 11. Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010
  12. 137(4)(suppl):S130-S135. [CrossRef] 12. Yu JJ, Kim GT, Choi YS et al. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod. 2012
  13. 82(2):275-283. [CrossRef] 13. Proffit W, Fields H. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Elsevier
  14. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. “Safe zones”: A guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 2006