Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1

RDW Value may Increase the Diagnostic Accuracy of MPS

Pages
76–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, the findings suggest that using of RDW value is a cheap and feasible parameter that may prevent performing unnecessary coronary angiography for patients after MPS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: As the feasibility of obtaining health care has improved in the last decade, there is an increase in the number of per - forming unnecessary coronary angiogram.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 452 patients diagnosed as stabile angina that had MPS to evaluate coronary ischemia and after which coronary angiography was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, the findings suggest that using of RDW value is a cheap and feasible parameter that may prevent performing unnecessary coronary angiography for patients after MPS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: As the feasibility of obtaining health care has improved in the last decade, there is an increase in the number of per - forming unnecessary coronary angiogram. Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW), which shows erythrocyte dispersion volume, is as- sociated with coronary artery disease. The present study aims to evaluate the relationship between RDW value and the severity of coronary artery disease in patients who undergo myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) as an evaluation for coronary ischemia and after which patients had a coronary angiography. Methods: This retrospective study included 452 patients diagnosed as stabile angina that had MPS to evaluate coronary ischemia and after which coronary angiography was performed. Complete blood count was obtained on the same day. Patients were first divided into two groups: patients with and without ischemia on MPS. Then, the group who had ischemia on the MPS where divided into another two groups: patients who had RDW values ≥13.5 and the others who had RDW value <13.5. Patients who had fixed perfusion defect, chronic kidney disease, thyroid dysfunction, hematological disease, those who use iron supplements, and those who had active infectious disease were excluded from this study. Results: The basic characteristics were the same between study groups. We found that severe coronary vessel disease, single ves- sel, two vessels and three vessels diseases were higher in patients who had ischemia on the MPS and RDW values ≥13.5 (p-value were 0.032, 0.004, 0.042 respectively). RDW values ≥13.5 was found to be an independent predictor for the presence of severe coronary artery disease (p<0.001 OR:3.55). Conclusion: Patients who have MPS for ischemic evaluation and RDW values of ≥ 13.5 were more severe coronary heart dis- eases. As a result, the findings suggest that using of RDW value is a cheap and feasible parameter that may prevent performing unnecessary coronary angiography for patients after MPS.

🔖

Cite This Article

CETİN, S., YİLDİZ, S. S., KESKİN, K., SİGİRCİ, S., BAYRAKTAR, A., SAHİN, I. (2021). RDW Value may Increase the Diagnostic Accuracy of MPS. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1, 76–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/402863

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kenneth K, Marshall A, Lichtman JT, Marcel L, Oliver W CM. Wil- liams hematology. 9th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2016
  2. Zurauskaite G, Meier M, Voegeli A, Koch D, Haubitz S, Kutz A, et al. Biological pathways underlying the association of red cell distri- bution width and adverse clinical outcome: Results of a prospec- tive cohort study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191280
  3. Çetin M, Kocaman SA, Bostan M, Çanga A, Çiçek Y, Erdoğan T, et al. Red Blood cell distribution width (RDW) and its association with coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur J Gen Med 2012;9:7–13
  4. From AM, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR Jr, Prasad A. Tempo- ral trends and improved outcomes of percutaneous coronary revascularization in nonagenarians. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:692–8
  5. Emre D, Terzi S, Nuhaj D, Erdem A, Yazici S, Ceylan US, et al. Associ- ation between clinical and noninvasive test findings and nonob- structive coronary artery disease in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. MN Kardiyoloji 2015:198–202
  6. Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:e002666
  7. Head SJ, Farooq V, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP. The SYNTAX score and its clinical implications. Heart 2014;100:169–77
  8. Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M, Nichols M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological up- date 2016. Eur Heart J 2016;37(:3232–45
  9. Adler AJ, Martin N, Mariani J, Tajer CD, Owolabi OO, Free C, et al. Mobile phone text messaging to improve medication adherence in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Da- tabase Syst Rev 2017;4:CD011851
  10. Mastoi QU, Wah TY, Gopal Raj R, Iqbal U. Automated diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a review and workflow. Cardiol Res Pract 2018;2018:2016282
  11. Ünlü M. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease: SPET and PET. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2008;8:5–11
  12. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE, Hert SD, et al; Authors/Task Force Members. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and manage - ment: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiol- ogy (ESC) and the European