Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the Efficacy of Definitive Radiotherapy and Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Pages
225–230
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No significant between-group difference was found in the biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates after 3 and 5 years of follow-ups (p≥0.005).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This retrospective study aimed to examine treatment outcomes and patient selection criteria in individuals with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or radical prostatectomy (RP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In total, 72 patients treated with definitive RT or RP for high-risk PCa between 2011 and 2018 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No significant between-group difference was found in the biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates after 3 and 5 years of follow-ups (p≥0.005).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to examine treatment outcomes and patient selection criteria in individuals with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and Methods: In total, 72 patients treated with definitive RT or RP for high-risk PCa between 2011 and 2018 were included in the study. Patient characteristics, treatment data, and follow-up data were obtained from the patient’s file. Results: Of 72 patients with high-risk PCa, 34 (46.6%) received definitive RT and ADT and 38 (52.1%) had undergone RP. The median follow-up time in the RP group was 44.5 (range, 14-100) months and that in the RP group was 48 (range, 9-108) months. No significant between-group difference was found in the biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates after 3 and 5 years of follow-ups (p≥0.005). In a subgroup analysis, RT was the treatment of choice for patients aged ≥65 years and for those with prostate-specific antigen values of ≥20 ng/dL, a Gleason score (GS) of 9-10, and T stage T3-4 and N+ status (p=0.015, 0.001, 0.035, and 0.022, respectively). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, age ≥65 years and GS of 8-10 were significant risk factors for reduced OS in all high-risk PCa cases. Conclusion: No significant difference was found in the

🔖

Cite This Article

İNANÇ, B., MERMUT, Ö., YÜCETAŞ, U. (2021). Comparison of the Efficacy of Definitive Radiotherapy and Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 225–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/401897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424
  2. Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, et al. Annual report to the Nation on The Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, featuring ıncidence of breast cancer subtypes by race/ethnicity, poverty, and state. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107:djv048. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv048
  3. Johnstone PA, Ward KC, Goodman M, et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinical T4 prostate cancer. Cancer 2006;106:2603-2609
  4. Spahn M, Weis C, Bader P, et al. Longterm outcome of patients with highrisk prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy and stage-dependent adjuvant androgen deprivation. Urol Int 2010;84:164-173
  5. Steuber T, Budäus L, Walz J, et al. Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study. BJU Int 2011;107:1755-1761
  6. Siddiqui SA, Boorjian SA, Blute ML, et al. Impact of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy on the survival of patients with pathological T3b prostate cancer. BJU Int 2011;107:383-388
  7. Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, et al. Prostate cancer, version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:479-505
  8. Wang Z, Ni Y, Chen J, et al. The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020;18:42
  9. Litwin MS, Gore JL, Kwan L, et al. Quality of life after surgery, external beam irradiation, or brachytherapy for early-s tage prostate cancer. Cancer 2007;109:2239-2247
  10. Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1358-1367
  11. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, et al. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001;58:843-848
  12. Roach M, Hanks G, Thames H Jr, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix consensus conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:965-974
  13. US Department of Health and Human Services. Common Ter