Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Brand authenticity leads to perceived value and brand trust

Marka özgünlüğü, algılanan değere ve marka güvenine yol açar

Pages
143–152
Publication Date
2022-04-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, higher perception of brand authenticity positively affects higher perceived value perception and higher brand trust perception.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research was carried out to examine the relationship between brand individuality, brand consistency, brand continuity, perceived value and brand trust, which are considered as sub-dimensions of brand authenticity, in the cosmetics industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, 405 people were reached by using the online questionnaire technique and the convenience sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, higher perception of brand authenticity positively affects higher perceived value perception and higher brand trust perception.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka bireyselliği · Algılanan değer · Marka Güveni

Abstract

The research was carried out to examine the relationship between brand individuality, brand consistency, brand continuity, perceived value and brand trust, which are considered as sub-dimensions of brand authenticity, in the cosmetics industry. Consumers using cosmetic products constitute the universe of the research. In this context, 405 people were reached by using the online questionnaire technique and the convenience sampling method. The Smart PLS 3 statistics program was used to test the hypotheses in the study. The bootstrapping technique was used to test the hypotheses aimed to be measured in the study. According to the analysis results, higher perception of brand individuality, higher perception of brand consistency and higher perception of brand continuity positively affect the perception of brand authenticity. In addition, higher perception of brand authenticity positively affects higher perceived value perception and higher brand trust perception.

Özet

Araştırma, marka özgünlüğünün alt boyutları olarak değerlendirilen marka bireyselliği (brand individuality), marka tutarlılığı (brand consistency), marka sürekliliği (brand continuity) ile algılanan değer (perceived value) ve marka güveni (brand trust) arasındaki ilişkinin kozmetik sektöründe incelenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini kozmetik ürünleri kullanan tüketiciler oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çevrimiçi anket tekniği kullanılarak kolayda örneklem yöntemiyle 405 kişiye ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmada hipotezlerin test edilmesi için Smart PLS 3 istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada ölçülmesi amaçlanan hipotezlerin testi için bootstrapping tekniği uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre daha yüksek marka bireyselliği algısı, daha yüksek marka tutarlılığı algısı ve daha yüksek marka sürekliliği algısı, marka özgünlüğü algısını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Ayrıca marka özgünlüğünün daha yüksek algılanması, algılanan değer algısını ve marka güveni algısını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞ, K. (2022). Brand authenticity leads to perceived value and brand trust. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 143–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/400476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akbar, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing brand authenticity and validating its scale, master of science in management, University of Lethbridge Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. Ali, F.,Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. ve Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of theuse of partialleastsquaresstructuralequationmodeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitalityresearch. International Journal of ContemporaryHospitality Management, 30(1), 514-538.
  2. Arya, V., Verma, H., Sethi, D., ve Agarwal, R. (2019). Brand Authenticity and Brand Attachment: How Online Communities Built on Social Networking Vehicles Moderate the Consumers’ Brand Attachment. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 227797521982550. doi:10.1177/2277975219825508 Bengtsson, A., Bardhi, F., ve Venkatraman, M. (2010). How global brands travel with consumers. International Marketing Review, 27(5), 519–540. doi:10.1108/02651331011076572 Beverland, M.B., Lindgreen, A. ve Vink, M.W. (2008). Projecting authenticity through advertising: consumer judgments of advertisers’ claims, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 5-15.
  3. Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D. ve Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand authenticity: towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement, in Canli, Z., Otnes, C. and Zhu, R. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 40, Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN, pp 567-576.
  4. Charles, S. (2014). Understanding brand authenticity in specialized communities: An interpretive qualitative study of the Brit Iron Rebels Las Vegas Clan, Master thesis, University of Nevada Las Vegas. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, Publishers.
  5. Dağ, K. ve Durmaz, Y. (2020). Marka Ve Marka Özgünlüğü (Uygulamalı). 1.Baskı.
  6. İstanbul.
  7. Hiper Yayınları Dağ, K. ve Durmaz, Y. (2020). Marka özgünlüğünün marka imajı ve marka tercihindeki ilişkisinde marka güveninin aracılık rolü. OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(32), 4840-4874.DOI: 10.26466/opus.741062 Delgado, E. ve Fernández, E. (2016). Once upon a brand: storytelling practices by Spanish brands, Spanish Journal of Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 115-131.
  8. Delgado-Ballester, E., ve Manuera-Aleman, J. L. (2000). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1238-1258.
  9. Domnin V. N. ve Starov S.A. (2017). Evolution of key concepts of brand management, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management., 16(1), 5-