Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

The assesment of the postoperative changes in patients have undergonereduction mammaplasty with USG and MRI

Küçültme mammaplasti ameliyatı uygulanan hastalarda oluşan ameliyat sonrası değişikliklerin MRG ve USG ile değerlendirilmesi

Pages
22–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the the cost were considered into account, USG might be more advantageous.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The assesment of the postoperative changes in patients have undergone reduction mammaplasty with USG and MRI Objective: Our study aimed to investigate the roles of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in postoperative screening of patients who have undergone reduction mammaplasty.Material and Methods: The patients included the study were examined clinically and radiologically on the postoperative 6th months.Results: In USG imagings, skin thicknesses were increased and locule fluid were accumulated in all patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also in MR imagings, parenchyma distortion, asymmetry, focal fibrosis, postoperative locule fluid accumulation and fat necrosis were the most screened findings.Conclusion: In the literature review, there is no study which asseses the changings occur in breast tissue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the the cost were considered into account, USG might be more advantageous.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The assesment of the postoperative changes in patients have undergone reduction mammaplasty with USG and MRI Objective: Our study aimed to investigate the roles of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in postoperative screening of patients who have undergone reduction mammaplasty.Material and Methods: The patients included the study were examined clinically and radiologically on the postoperative 6th months.Results: In USG imagings, skin thicknesses were increased and locule fluid were accumulated in all patients. Also in MR imagings, parenchyma distortion, asymmetry, focal fibrosis, postoperative locule fluid accumulation and fat necrosis were the most screened findings.Conclusion: In the literature review, there is no study which asseses the changings occur in breast tissue. With high resolution ultrasonography, the difference of benign or malignant characteristic of lesion can be made even in a very small lesions. In our study we did not find any superiority of MRI to USG. When the the cost were considered into account, USG might be more advantageous.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamız küçültme mammaplasti (KM) ameliyatı geçirmiş hastaların ameliyat sonrası takibinde ultrasonografi ve manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin rolünü değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya dahil olan tüm hastalara ameliyat sonrası 6. ayda ayrıntılı meme muayenesi yapıldı. Bilateral meme US ve bilateral meme MRG tetkikleri istendi.Bulgular: USG'de tüm hastalarda ameliyata bağlı olarak ciltte kalınlık artışı ve ameliyat sonrası loküle sıvı koleksiyonları izlendi. MRG'de en sık rastlanan bulgular parenkimal distorsiyon ve asimetri, fokal fibrozis, postoperatif sıvı koleksiyonu ve yağ nekrozu idi.Sonuç: KM ameliyatı geçirmiş hastaların ameliyat sonrası meme bugularını takip eden kapsamlı çalışma literatürde bulunmamaktadır. Yüksek rezolüsyonlu USG ile çok küçük lezyonlarda bile malign ve benign ayrımı yapılabilmektedir. Meme lezyonlarının tanısında MRG rutin kullanılan bir tanı yöntemi değildir. Bizim çalışmamızda MRG'nin USG incelemeye üstünlüğü saptanmamış ve benzer bulgular elde edilmiştir. USG maliyet açısından değerlendirildiğinde de MRG'den daha avantajlı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

FIRATLIGİL, A. S., AKÇAL, A., KARŞIDAĞ, S., SİRVAN, S. S. (2014). The assesment of the postoperative changes in patients have undergonereduction mammaplasty with USG and MRI. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/399612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Blaine CM, Subbio CR, Eid SM, Murphy RX Jr. Reduction mammaplasty trends: a quality and fiscal analysis update. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 344-6
  2. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999; 213: 889-94
  3. Rosen PR. Rosen's Breast Pathology. 3nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2009; 1-32
  4. Berg WA. Birdwell RL. Diagnostic Imaging Breast. Utah: Amirsys, 2006; I-2: 35
  5. Stavros AT. Breast Ultrasound. Philadelphia: Lippincott 2004; 56-108
  6. Heywang-Köbrunner SH. Diagnostic Breast Imaging. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme, 2001; 162-208
  7. Solomon B, Orel S, Reynolds C, Schnall M. Delayed Development of Enhancement in Fat Necrosis After Breast Conservation Therapy:A Potential Pitfall of MR Imaging of the Breast. AJR 1998; 170: 966-8
  8. Venta LA, Wiley EL, Gabriel H, Adler YT. Imaging Features of Focal Breast Fibrosis: Mammographic-Pathologic Correlation of Non calcified Breast Lesions. AJR 1999; 173: 309-16.