Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3

Rehabilitation results of patients with traumatic brain injury

Travmatik beyin hasarlı hastalarda rehabilitasyon sonuçları

Pages
207–211
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The neurologic rehabilitation significantly affects the recovery of functional status after traumatic brain injury.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation in patients with traumatic brain injury.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The functional differences between the admission of the patients and their final control examinations were compared using Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Functional Ambulation Scale (FAS), and cognitive differences were compared using their recent status criteria, with Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS).Results: There was a significant improvement in the functional status of patients after neurological rehabilitation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The neurologic rehabilitation significantly affects the recovery of functional status after traumatic brain injury.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. Materials and Method: Forty-five patients who were rehabilitated after traumatic brain injury were included in the study. The sociodemographic characteristics of the patients, the cause of the injury, the duration of coma and posttraumatic amnesia, the duration of stay in the other clinics after injury, the time between injury and admission to the rehabilitation clinic, the duration of stay in the rehabilitation clinic and long-term complications were determined. The functional differences between the admission of the patients and their final control examinations were compared using Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Functional Ambulation Scale (FAS), and cognitive differences were compared using their recent status criteria, with Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS).Results: There was a significant improvement in the functional status of patients after neurological rehabilitation. There were statistically significant changes in DRS, FIM, FAS and RLAS scores after treatment compared to initial status. Better improvement in the functional status was detected in patients with lower initial DRS scores and higher FIM and RLAS scores. Conclusion: The neurologic rehabilitation significantly affects the recovery of functional status after traumatic brain injury.

Özet

Amaç: Travmatik beyin hasarlı hastalarda nörolojik rehabilitasyon etkinliğini araştırmak.Garaç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya travmatik beyin hasarı sonrası rehabilite edilen 45 hasta alındı. Hastaların sosyodemografik özellikleri, yaralanma nedeni, koma süresi, posttravmatik amnezi süresi, yaralanma sonrası diğer kliniklerde kalış süresi, yaralanma ile rehabilitasyon kliniğine yatış arasındaki süre, rehabilitasyon kliniğinde kalma süreleri ve uzun dönem komplikasyonları belirlendi. Hastaların kliniğimize ilk yatışları ile son kontrolleri arasındaki fark fonksiyonel açıdan; Özürlülük Derecelendirme Ölçütü (Disability Rating Scale, DRS), Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçütü (Functional Independence Measure, FIM) ve Fonksiyonel Ambulasyon Skalası (FAS), bilişsel açıdan ise Rancho Los Amigos bilişsel fonksiyon düzeyleri skalası (RLAS) son durum ölçütleri kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Nörolojik rehabilitasyon sonrasında hastaların fonksiyonel durumlarında belirgin iyileşme oldu. Başlangıç ve tedavi sonrası DRS, FİM, FAS ve RLAS skorlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değişimler oldu. Başlangıç DRS skoru düşük, FİM ve RLAS skoru yüksek olanlarda fonksiyonel son durumun daha iyi olduğu tespit edildi.Sonuç: Travmatik beyin hasarı sonrası nörolojik rehabilitasyon fonksiyonel son durumun daha iyi olmasını sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARPUZ, S., KÜÇÜKŞEN, S. (2017). Rehabilitation results of patients with traumatic brain injury. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3, 207–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/399601

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Rimel RW, Jane JA, Bond MR. Characteristics of the Head Injured Patients In: Rosental M,Griffith ER, Bond MR, Miller JD (eds). Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury. Second Edition Philadelphia FA Davis Company; 1990. p.8-17
  2. Paşaoğlu A. Erişkinde Kafa Travmaları. Temel Nöroşirürji Cilt I, Ankara: Türk Nöroşirürji Derneği Yayınları; 2005. p.316-23
  3. Sloan S, Winkler D, Anson K. Long term outcome following TBI. Brain Impairment 2007; 8: 251-61. [CrossRef] 4. Hassett L, Moseley AM, Tate R, Harmer AR. Fitness training for cardiorespiratory conditioning after traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; Issue 2
  4. De Silva M, MacLachlan M, Devane D, Desmond D, Gallagher P, Schnyder U, et al. Psychosocial interventions for the prevention of disability following traumatic physical injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Issue 4
  5. Turner-Stokes L, Nair A, Sedki I, Disler PB, Wade DT. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; Issue 3
  6. Cicerone KD. Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 494-501. [CrossRef] 8. Meray J. Travmatik beyin hasarında değerlendirme. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 2005; 51(Özel ek 8):30-4
  7. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins HK. Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 118-23
  8. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater agreement of the seven-level Functional independence Measurement (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 115-9
  9. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:566-73. [CrossRef] 12. Holden MK, Kathlee MG, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, PiehlBaker L. Clinical gait assesment in the neurologically impaired. Rehability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530-9. [CrossRef] 13. Whyte J, Hart T, Laborde A, Rosenthal M. Rehabilitation of the patient with traumatic brain injury. In: DeLisa J, Gans BM, Bockenek WL, Currie DM, Geiringer SR, Gerber LH (eds) Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 1191-239
  10. Mysiw WJ, Corrigan JD, Hunt M, Cavin D, Fish T. Vocational evaluation of traumatic brain injury patients using the functional assessment inventory. Brain Injury 19