Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Iran and Turkey in Terms of Biomass Energy Use

Biyokütle Enerji Kullanımı Açısından İran ve Türkiye’nin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
1235–1250
Publication Date
2021-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, the aim of the study is to compare the biomass energy use of both countries other than non-renewable energy sources, and to reveal the efforts and potentials in this regard.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biomass energy has some advantages such as sustainability, availability from local resources and no adverse effects on the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Biomass energy is also an important goal for countries aiming for environmentally friendly sustainable energy production and development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, the aim of the study is to compare the biomass energy use of both countries other than non-renewable energy sources, and to reveal the efforts and potentials in this regard.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yenilenebilir enerji · bioenerji · biomas

Abstract

Biomass energy has some advantages such as sustainability, availability from local resources and no adverse effects on the environment. Biomass energy is also an important goal for countries aiming for environmentally friendly sustainable energy production and development. Iran and Turkey are two neighbor countries in the region and they have social, economic and political relations presently as happened in the past. Although both countries have development efforts, the most important issue stands out as energy supply and security. In this respect, the aim of the study is to compare the biomass energy use of both countries other than non-renewable energy sources, and to reveal the efforts and potentials in this regard.

Özet

Biyokütle enerjisinin sürdürülebilirlik, yerel kaynaklardan elde edilebilirlik ve çevre üzerinde olumsuz bir etkisi olmaması gibi avantajları vardır. Biyokütle enerjisi, çevre dostu sürdürülebilir enerji üretimi ve gelişimini hedefleyen ülkeler için de önemli bir hedeftir. Yakın İran ve Türkiye, bölgenin sosyal, ekonomik ve siyasi ilişkilerinde tarihi bir geçmişe sahiptir. Her iki ülkenin de kalkınma çabaları olsa da en önemli konu enerji arzı ve güvenliği olarak öne çıkıyor. Bu doğrultuda çalışmanın amacı, her iki ülkenin yenilenemeyen enerji kaynakları dışındaki biyokütle enerjisi kullanımlarını karşılaştırmak ve bu konudaki çaba ve potansiyelleri ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

JORJANİ, S., YILDIRIM, H. T., REZAEİNİA, S. (2021). Comparison of Iran and Turkey in Terms of Biomass Energy Use. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 1235–1250. https://ajindex.com/articles/399449

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ahmadi, A., Esmaeilion, F., Esmaeilion, A., Ehyaei, M.A., 2020. Benefits and limitations of waste-to-energy conversion in Iran. Renewable Energy Research and Application, 2020. 1(1): 27-45.
  2. Balances, E., 2011. Power and Energy Planning Department. Ministry of Energy of IR IRAN. Ballesteros I., Negro M.J., Oliva J.M., Cabañas A., Manzanares P., Ballesteros M., 2006. Ethanol Production From Steam-Explosion Pretreated Wheat Straw. In: mcmillan J.D., Adney W.S., Mielenz J.R., Klasson K.T. (eds) Twenty-Seventh Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. ABAB Symposium. Humana Press. Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-268-7_ (Ref. Date: 11.08.2020).
  3. Bougnom, B.P.;Niederkofler, C.;Knapp, B. A.;Stimpfl, E.;Insam, H., 2012. Residues from renewable energy production: their value for fertilizing pastures. Biomass and Bioenergy, 39: 290-295.
  4. Brack, D., 2007. The impacts of the demand for woody biomass for power and heat on climate and forests. Chatham House, p. 4-10. EHAE (Enerji Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü), 2018. Çalıştay Raporu: 2020 sonrası YEK kanunu ve YEKDEM nasıl olmalı. https://www.enerjihukuku.org.tr/storage/2018/01/2020-sonras%C4%B1-yek-kanunu-ve-yekdem-nas%C4%B1l-olmal%C4%B1-%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9Ftay-raporu-1.pdf (Ref date: 08.06.2020) FAO, 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization Forestry Production and Trade. Http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (Ref. Date: 08.06.2020). GDF, 2011. Türkiye ormancılık istatistikleri 2011. https://web.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Istatistikler/Ormanc%C4%B1l%C4%B1k%20%C4%B0statistikleri/Ormanc%C4%B1l%C4%B1k%20%C4%B0statistikleri%202011.pdf (Ref Date: 08.06.2020). GDF, 2020. Türkiye ormancılık istatistikleri 2020. https://web.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Sayfalar/Istatistikler.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fekutuphane%2FIstatistikler%2FOrmanc%C4%B1l%C4%B1k%20%C4%B0statistikleri&FolderCTID=0x012000301D182F8CB9FC49963274E712A2DC00&View={4B3B693B-B532-4C7F-A2D0-732F715C89CC} (Ref Date: 08.06.2020).
  5. Gökbulak, F., Uygur Erdoğan, B., Yıldırım, H.T., Özçelik, M.S. 2018. Causes of land degradation and rehabilitation efforts of rangelands in Turkey. Forestist 68(2): 106-113. IEA, 2018. International Recommendations for Energy Stattistics (IRES). Https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energystats/methodology/documents/IRES-web.pdf (Ref. Tarihi: 08.06.2020)
  6. İLLEEZ, B., 2020. Türkiye’nın Enerji Görünümü: Türkiye’de Biyokütle Enerjisi. Https://www.mmo.org.tr/sites/default/files/TEG-2020-13_%20Biyok%C3%bctle%20Enerjisi%20_B%C3%bclent%20%C4%b0lleez.pdf (Ref. Date: 0