Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

FORENSIC TRAUMATIC CASES IN THE GERIATRIC POPULATION

Pages
35–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Trauma severityappears to be more severe in accidental injuries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Physiological and metabolic changes arising in elderliness mayincrease the risk of trauma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to determine the causes of trauma, traumatic lesions, and permanentdamage status in the geriatric population by analyzing forensic trauma cases.Materials and Method: Subjects were randomly selected from patients aged≥65 years whose forensic evaluation was performed at the department of forensicmedicine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Trauma severityappears to be more severe in accidental injuries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Physiological and metabolic changes arising in elderliness mayincrease the risk of trauma. The causes of trauma and trauma severity may vary withage. We aimed to determine the causes of trauma, traumatic lesions, and permanentdamage status in the geriatric population by analyzing forensic trauma cases.Materials and Method: Subjects were randomly selected from patients aged≥65 years whose forensic evaluation was performed at the department of forensicmedicine. The sample size was determined with Epi-Info version 7 software. SPSSWindows 20.0 software was used to analyze the data.Results: Of the patients, 68.9% were male and 31.1% were female, with a meanage of 72.8 ± 6.11 years. Among them, 53.8% and 46.2% were exposed to traumadue to non-accidental causes and an accident, respectively. Such accidental injuriesmost commonly occurred due to traffic accidents (78%) and falls (16.7%), whereasnon-accidental injuries most commonly occurred due to intentional injuries (96.1%).Accidental and non-accidental injuries were most commonly seen in females andmales, respectively. The injury severity score was higher for accidental injuries.Minor and major injuries were observed in 95.1% and 4.9% patients, respectively,according to the injury severity score. Of the major injuries, 42.9% were in the headand neck region.Conclusion: According to our results, non-accidental traumas in the geriatricpopulation are similar to those in other age groups, whereas injuries due to fallsincrease in the former with a decrease in physiological reserves. Trauma severityappears to be more severe in accidental injuries.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, M. T., KILINÇ, B. B. (2020). FORENSIC TRAUMATIC CASES IN THE GERIATRIC POPULATION. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 35–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/398940

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gulacti U, Lok U, Celik M, Aktas N, Polat H. The ED use and non-urgent visits of elderly patients. Turk J Emerg Med 2016;16(4):141-5. (PMID: 27995205)
  2. Ross MA, Compton S, Richardson D, Jones R, Nittis T, Wilson A. The use and effectiveness of an emergency department observation unit for elderly patients. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41(5):668-77. (PMID:12712034)
  3. Vanpee D, Swine C, Vandenbossche P, Gillet JB. Epidemiological profile of geriatric patients admitted to the emergency department of a university hospital localized in a rural area. Eur J Emerg Med 2001;8(4):301-4. (PMID:11785598)
  4. OJ Ma, SW Meldon. Geriatric Trauma. In:Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS (Eds). Emergency Medicine A Comprehensive Study Guide. 6th edition, McGraw- Hill, New York 2004, pp 1549-53
  5. Miller KE, Zylstra RG, Standridge JB. The geriatric patient: a systematic approach to maintaining health. American Family Physician 2000;61(49):1089-104. (PMID:10706161)
  6. Fahim NK, Negida A, Fahim AK. Sample size calculation guide-part 3: how to calculate the sample size for an independent case-control study. Adv J Emerg Med 2019;3(2):20. (PMID:31172131)
  7. Clement ND, Tennant C, Muwanga C. Polytrauma in the elderly: predictors of the cause and time of death. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2010;18(1):26. (PMID:20465806)
  8. Goris RJA. The injury severity score. World Surg 1983;7(1):12-8. (PMID:6837052)
  9. Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(1):52-4. (PMID:23495371)
  10. Magnotti LJ, Fischer PE, Zarzaur BL, Fabian TC, Croce MA. Impact of gender on outcomes after blunt injury: a definitive analysis of more than 36,000 trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206(5):984-91. (PMID:18471739)
  11. Karbeyaz K, Gunduz T, Balci Y. Forensic medicine approach to bone fractures in the framework of the new Turkish penal code. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 2010;16(5):453-8. (PMID: 21038125)
  12. Mann NC, Cahn RM, Mullins RJ, Brand DM, Jurkovich GJ. Survival among injured geriatric patients during construction of a statewide trauma system. J Trauma 2001;50(6):1111-6. (PMID:11426127)
  13. Hung KKC, Yeung JH, Cheung CS, et al. Trauma team activation criteria and outcomes of geriatric trauma: 10 year single centre cohort study. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37(3):450-6. (PMID:30041911)
  14. Eom KS. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic brain injury in elderly population: a multicent