Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Determination of University Students’ Solutions to Climate Change through PESTEL Analysis in The Sample of Ataturk University

Pages
1087–1110
Publication Date
2021-12-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results also show that the students find political factors, education and urbanisation as the most important three keywords which can solve climate change problem and where measures should be taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climate change is an important problem for the world since it causes serious impacts on humans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study adopts three – staged application including one conference, training and workshop using PESTEL analysis over 60 university students from the academic departments related to the factors of PESTEL.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results also show that the students find political factors, education and urbanisation as the most important three keywords which can solve climate change problem and where measures should be taken.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Climate change · PESTEL · university youth

Abstract

Climate change is an important problem for the world since it causes serious impacts on humans. Action to take measures is to raise awareness among people using innovative methods. PESTEL is an effective environmental analysis method used in planning for businesses. Present study uses this analysis to determine youth’s opinions about the solutions to the problems caused by climate change. The study adopts three – staged application including one conference, training and workshop using PESTEL analysis over 60 university students from the academic departments related to the factors of PESTEL. As the result of the study, students’ views on the solution of climate change are categorised into six factor categories, political, urban issues, agricultural problems, energy, economic matters and education. Results also show that the students find political factors, education and urbanisation as the most important three keywords which can solve climate change problem and where measures should be taken.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESRİNGÜ, A., TOY, S. (2021). Determination of University Students’ Solutions to Climate Change through PESTEL Analysis in The Sample of Ataturk University. Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 1087–1110. https://ajindex.com/articles/398833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aguilar, F. J. 1967.
  2. Scanning the Business Environment, Macmillan, New York, NY. Anderson A., 2012. Climate Change Education for Mitigation and Adaptation. UNESCO Special Section on the ESD Response to the Three Rio Conventions. Vol 6(2): 191–206 10.1177/0973408212475199. Ardoin, N. M., Bowers,A. W., Gaillard,E. 2020. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation Volume 241, 108224. Azeiteiro, U. M., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Caetano, F. J. P., Caeiro, S., 2015. Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: experiences from Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 308e319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2014.11.056. Başoğlu, B., 2014. Küresel İklim Değişikliğinin Ekonomik Etkileri. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Bakoğlu R., Yıldız, M. L. 2017. Üniversitelerde Strateji Geliştirme Sürecinde Uygulamalı Durum Analizleri. Beta Publishing 144 pages. Candamio, L, V., Corti, I, N., Alvarez, M.T.G. 2018. The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 170, 1565e1578. Dare, C. 2006. The UK tour-operating industry: A competitive analysis. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 6(4), 357-367.
  3. Demirbilek, M. 2016. “Çevre, Çevre Mültecileri ve Çevreci Sosyal Hizmet”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Vol.2, No.3, ss.905 91. Erdal, H., Erdal, G., Yücel, M. 2013. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Çevre Bilinç Düzeyi Araştırması: Gazi Osman Paşa Üniversitesi Örneği, Gazi Osman Paşa Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, 4, 57-65.
  4. Ediger, V. Ş. 2008. Küresel İklim Değişikliğinin Uluslararası İlişkiler Boyutu ve Türkiye’nin Politikaları. Mülkiye Cilt:XXXII Sayı259. Ekşi, N. (2016), “İklim Mültecileri”, Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi, C.2, S.2, ss.10-58. European Commission 2000. Summary Record of Meeting: ECCP Working Group 1 https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/default/files/eccp/first/docs/wg1_minutes_en.pdf.
  5. Fankhauser, S., Tol, R. S. J. 2005. “On Climate Change and Economic Growth.” Resource and Energy Economics 27: 1–17.
  6. Guerra, J. B. S. O. A., Garcia, J, S, B., Heerdt, M., Berchin,I, I. A. 2018. proposal of a Balanced Scorecard for an environmental education program at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 172, Pages 1674-1690.
  7. Gaziulusoy, A. I., Boyle, C., 2013. Proposing a heuristic reflective tool for reviewing literature in transdisciplinary research for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 48, 1