Journals / Gıda / 2006 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Effect of Bromelin, Ficin and Papain Enzymes on some Technological Characteristics of Fresh and Frozen Beef Longissimus Dorsi Muscles (Turkish with English Abstract)

Taze ve Dondurulmuş Sığır Longissimus dorsi Kaslarının bazı Teknolojik Özellikleri Üzerine Bromelin, Ficin ve Papain Enzimlerinin Etkisi

Journal
Gıda
Pages
—
Publication Date
2006-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

WHC was increased by ficin treatment in fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles at statistically significant level (p<0.01).It can be said that the proteolitic enzymes used in this research different effect on the fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, the effects of various plant enzymes (bromelin, ficin, papain) on emulsion capacity (EC), emulsion stability (ES), water seperation (WS), oil seperation (OS), cooking loss (CL), water-holding capacity (WHC) of fresh and frozen beef Longissimusdorsi muscles were deterined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statistical analyses showed that EC of samples were significantly (p<0.01) increased by all of the plant enzymes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:WHC was increased by ficin treatment in fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles at statistically significant level (p<0.01).It can be said that the proteolitic enzymes used in this research different effect on the fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:L. dorsi · taze · dondurulmuş

Abstract

In this research, the effects of various plant enzymes (bromelin, ficin, papain) on emulsion capacity (EC), emulsion stability (ES), water seperation (WS), oil seperation (OS), cooking loss (CL), water-holding capacity (WHC) of fresh and frozen beef Longissimusdorsi muscles were deterined. Statistical analyses showed that EC of samples were significantly (p<0.01) increased by all of the plant enzymes. In frozen L. dorsi, WS was significantly (p<0.01) by bromelin. WS were increased at statistically significant level (p<0.01) in both fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles treated by ficin. OS were decreased significantly (p<0.01) with the treatment of bromelin in frozen L. dorsi samples. ES was increased significantly (p<0.01) in bromelin treated fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles but decreased by the effects of ficin at statisticaly significant level (p<0,01). Bromelin and papain increased CL rates on fresh L. dorsi at statistically significant level (p<0,01), as well as in frozen L. dorsi (p<0.05). WHC was increased by ficin treatment in fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles at statistically significant level (p<0.01).It can be said that the proteolitic enzymes used in this research different effect on the fresh and frozen L. dorsi muscles.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, çeşitli bitkisel enzimlerle (bromelin, ficin, papain) muamele işleminin, taze ve dondurularak muhafaza edilmiş sığır L. dorsi kaslarının emülsiyon kapasitesi (EK), emülsiyondan ayrılan su oranı (EAS), emülsiyondan ayrılan yağ oranı (EAY), emülsiyon stabilite oranı (ESO), pişirme kaybı (PK) ve su tutma kapasitesi (STK) üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen istatistiki analiz sonuçlarına göre, her üç enzim de emülsiyon kapasitesini önemli (P<0.01) ölçüde arttırmıştır. Dondurulan L. dorsi örneklerinde; bromelinEAS oranını istatistiki olarak önemli (p<0.01) düzeyde arttırmıştır. Ficin uygulaması, taze ve dondurulmuş L. dorsi örneklerinin EAY oranını istatistiki olarak önemli (p<0.01) derecede arttırmıştır. Bromelin uygulaması taze ve dondurulan L. dorsi örneklerinin ESO'nıistatistiki olarak önemli (p<0.01) ölçüde arttırırken, ficin uygulaması önemli (p<0.01) ölçüde azaltmıştır. Bromelin ve papain, pişirme kaybını taze L. dorsi kaslarında istatistiki olarak çok önemli (p<0.01) düzeyde, dondurulmuş örneklerde ise önemli (p<0.05) düzeyde arttırmışlardır. Ficin uygulamasının taze ve dondurulan L. dorsi örneklerinin, STK'niistatistiki olarak önemli (p<0.01) oranda yükselttiği tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak bitkisel proteolitik enzimlerin taze ve dondurulmuş L. dorsi kaslarının teknolojik özelliklerini farklı düzeylerde değiştirdiği söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PALAMUTOĞLU, R., KARAKAYA, M., SARIÇOBAN, C. (2006). Effect of Bromelin, Ficin and Papain Enzymes on some Technological Characteristics of Fresh and Frozen Beef Longissimus Dorsi Muscles (Turkish with English Abstract). Gıda, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/39866

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abdallah NM, Amin AT and Yousset NIKE. 197B. Etfect of some proteolytic enzymes on chemicai, physical and organoleptic characteristics of camel meat. Annoals Agric. Sci.-Mostcnor 9:113-t23. (Abstract). Asiıie iNA, Sorenson TL and Nielsen PM. 2992. Effects of papaln and amicrobiai enzyme on meat proteins and besi tenderness. J. Food Sci. Vol: 67(6). 2138-2142. Bailey ME and Murdock.tr FA. 1991. Indigenous and Exogenous Enzymes oi Meat ln: Food enzymoâogy. Ed. FOX.P.F. Elsevier Sci. Publ. LTD. Essex. Brooks BA, Klasing KC and Regenstein JM. 1985. Etfects oi antemortem crude papain in chicken muscle. J. Food Sci.Vol: 50. 1370-1375. Caygill JC. t979. Sulphydı'yl plant proteases. Enzyme Microb. Thecnol.Vcl:1 (4), 233-242. Chaplin MF and Booka C. 1990. Enzyme Technology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. DeVitre HA and Cunnignam FE. 1985. Tenderizat'ıon ot spent hen muscle using pepsin, bromelén or ficin atone and in combination with saits. Pouitry Sci. 64114764483. Du Bois MW, Anglemler AF, Montgomery MW and Davidson Wi). 1972. Effect of proteoiys'ıs on the emulsitication characteristics of bovine skeletai muscle. J. Food Sci. 37:27—28. Düzgüneş 0. Kesici T ve Gürbüz F. 1983. istatistik Metotiarı. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. Yayın No: 860, 8:218. Ankara. Eskin MNA. 1999. Biochemistry ol Foods. 2nd ed. Academic Press. inc. Caiiicrnia. t 16 ' cım vu,: sı SAY]: 2 MART-MEAN 2mm Feliows P. 2000. Food Processing Technology Principles and Practice. 2 nd ed. Academic Press Inc. California. Feda YH, Basiouny SS, Abdallah MA end Shehats Mt. 1980. Studies on the effect of meat tendetizers on some chemical constituents of cennet and buffalo meets. Mesopotamia J. Agric. 15(1): 93-111 (Abstract). Fox PF, Monssey PA and Muivihiîi DM. 1982. Chemical and enzymatic modification ot food proteins in: “Developments in Food Proteins’ Ed. HUDSON, B.J.F. Applied Sci. Pub]. LTD. Essex. Gerelt S, lkeuchi Y and Suzuki A. 2000. Meet tendertzation by proteolytio enzymes after osmotic dehydtation. Meat Sci. 56:311—818. Gökalp HY, Kaya M. Tülek Y and Zorba Ö. 1993. Et Ürünlerinde Kalite Kontrolü ve Laboratuar Uygulama Kılavuzu. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Gıda Müh. Böl. Ders Kitabı Serisi No: 89. Erzurum. Hogan JM and Scott JF. 1960. US Patent 2,963,376. inz'Meet Product Manufecture Ed. KAHMAS. E. Noyes Date Corp. Part— Kang CK and Werner WD. 1974. Tenderizatioo ot meat with papaya latex proteeses. J. Food Soi. 39: 812818. Katakaya M and Ockerrnan HW. 2002. NaCl-KZHPO4, bazı bitkisel enz