Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Is there any effect of demographic features on development of hyperemesis gravidarum in the Turkish population?

Pages
995–999
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Living conditions, life standards, communication, and experiences in previous pregnancies might affect development of HG.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To assess the effect of maternal demographic variables on development of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) in pregnant Turkish women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Two hundred consecutive women with HG were defined as the study group, and 200 consecutive pregnant women without any signs or symptoms of HG matched for age, parity, and gestational age were defined as the control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Living conditions, life standards, communication, and experiences in previous pregnancies might affect development of HG.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Hyperemesis · pregnancy · demographic features

Abstract

To assess the effect of maternal demographic variables on development of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) in pregnant Turkish women. Materials and methods: Two hundred consecutive women with HG were defined as the study group, and 200 consecutive pregnant women without any signs or symptoms of HG matched for age, parity, and gestational age were defined as the control group. Personal information, including lifestyle, educational level, occupation, and economic status were obtained via questionnaire. Results: The number of abortions was higher but parity was lower in the HG group. The time interval between 2 pregnancies was significantly shorter in the HG group than in the control group. HG developed in all women who had HG in a previous pregnancy. HG was significantly higher in women who graduated from high school or university. Level of monthly income and communication within the family have an effect on development of HG. Logistic regression analysis showed that the most important parameters for prediction of HG were education level, age at marriage, and previous history of abortus. Conclusion: Living conditions, life standards, communication, and experiences in previous pregnancies might affect development of HG.

Özet

To assess the effect of maternal demographic variables on development of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) in pregnant Turkish women. Materials and methods: Two hundred consecutive women with HG were defined as the study group, and 200 consecutive pregnant women without any signs or symptoms of HG matched for age, parity, and gestational age were defined as the control group. Personal information, including lifestyle, educational level, occupation, and economic status were obtained via questionnaire. Results: The number of abortions was higher but parity was lower in the HG group. The time interval between 2 pregnancies was significantly shorter in the HG group than in the control group. HG developed in all women who had HG in a previous pregnancy. HG was significantly higher in women who graduated from high school or university. Level of monthly income and communication within the family have an effect on development of HG. Logistic regression analysis showed that the most important parameters for prediction of HG were education level, age at marriage, and previous history of abortus. Conclusion: Living conditions, life standards, communication, and experiences in previous pregnancies might affect development of HG.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMALAK, Z., KÖŞÜŞ, N., KÖŞÜŞ, A., HIZLI, D., AYRIM, A., KURT, G. (2013). Is there any effect of demographic features on development of hyperemesis gravidarum in the Turkish population?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 995–999. https://ajindex.com/articles/398173

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Eliakim R, Abulafia O, Sherer DM. Hyperemesis gravidarum: a current review. Am J Perinatol 2000; 17: 207–18.
  2. Verberg MF, Gillott DJ, Al Fardan N, Grudzinskas JG. Hyperemesis gravidarum, a literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11: 527–39.
  3. Adams MM, Harlass FE, Sarno AP, Read JA, Rawlings JS. Antenatal hospitalization among enlisted service women, 1987– 19 Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 35–9.
  4. Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Jamieson DJ, Schild L, Adams MM, Deshpande AD et al. Hospitalizations during pregnancy among managed care enrollees. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 94–100.
  5. Dodds L, Fell DB, Joseph KS, Allen VM, Butler B. Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 285–92. Bailit JL. Hyperemesis gravidarum: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 811–4. Kallen B. Hyperemesis during pregnancy and delivery outcome: a registry study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987; 26: 291–302.
  6. Aka N, Atalay S, Sayharman S, Kiliç D, Köse G, Küçüközkan T. Leptin and leptin receptor levels in pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46: 247–77. O’Brien B, Zhou Q. Variables related to nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Birth 1995; 22: 93–100.
  7. Kallen B, Lundberg G, Aberg A. Relationship between vitamin use, smoking, and nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 916–20.
  8. Bolat F, Eren Ö, Bolat G, Can E, Cömert S, Uslu HS et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and effects on neonatal anthropometry: a prospective study. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 999–1005.
  9. Gadsby R, Barnie-Adshead AM, Jagger C. A prospective study of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Br J Gen Pract 1993; 43: 245–8. Semmens JP. Female sexuality and life situations. An etiologic psycho-socio-sexual profile of weight gain and nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 38: 555–63.
  10. Weigel MM, Weigel RM. The association of reproductive history, demographic factors, and alcohol and tobacco consumption with the risk of developing nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127: 562–70.
  11. Roseboom TJ, Ravelli ACJ, Post JAV, Painter RC. Maternal characteristics largely explain poor pregnancy outcome after hyperemesis gravidarum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156: 56– Tsang IS, Katz VL, Wells SD. Maternal and fetal outcomes in hyperemesis gravidarum. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996; 55: 231– Bashiri A, Neumann L, Maymon E, Katz M. Hyperemesis gravidarum: