Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Evaluating Attempts By School Administrators To Control Noise Pollution In School

Pages
77–94
Publication Date
2022-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the findings, it was observed that noise control in school is an issue ignored by school administrators in terms of both acoustic measures and managerial regulations, quietness is not considered as a value in schools, and administrators do not have a specific noise management policy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it was aimed to evaluate the attempts of school administrators to control noise pollution at school.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of this study consists of 1118 school administrators working in public primary, secondary and high schools in Sakarya province in the 2020-2021 academic year. 394 participants were reached using snowball sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the findings, it was observed that noise control in school is an issue ignored by school administrators in terms of both acoustic measures and managerial regulations, quietness is not considered as a value in schools, and administrators do not have a specific noise management policy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Noise control in school · school administrators · educational administration supervision

Abstract

In the study, it was aimed to evaluate the attempts of school administrators to control noise pollution at school. A simple survey model was used in this study due to the determination of the current situation and its suitability for the objectives. The population of this study consists of 1118 school administrators working in public primary, secondary and high schools in Sakarya province in the 2020-2021 academic year. 394 participants were reached using snowball sampling method. As the data collection tool, a 20-item questionnaire created by the researcher was used. The data were analyzed using statistical package software. Frequency and percentage values, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, and relative change coefficient were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the findings, it was observed that noise control in school is an issue ignored by school administrators in terms of both acoustic measures and managerial regulations, quietness is not considered as a value in schools, and administrators do not have a specific noise management policy.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, C., HAMEDOĞLU, M. A. (2022). Evaluating Attempts By School Administrators To Control Noise Pollution In School. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 77–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/397128

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abakay, H. and Bulunuz, M. (2018). Okul içi ve okul dışı gürültü düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 53-65. doi: 10.31805/acjes.364014 Akyün Gezgin, C. (2019). Bir ilkokulda gürültü kirliliğini azaltmaya yönelik eğitim çalışmalarının değerlendirilmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). YÖK Tez Merkezi veri tabanından erişildi (Tez No: 602663). Arıcı, N. (2020). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel stres kaynakları ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişkisinin incelenmesi (Tezsiz yüksek lisans projesi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Denizli. Ay, Ş., Yapıcı, F. Ş., Kahraman, C. and Erusta, S. (2019, Haziran). Okullardaki derse giriş çıkış rutinlerinden zil uygulamalarına ilişkin öğrenci ve eğitimci görüşleri. Uluslararası Eğitim Kongresi, Sakarya. Babisch, W., Schulz, C., Seiwert, M. and Conrad, A. (2012). Noise annoyance as reported by 8- to 14-year-old children. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 28–82. doi: 10.1177/0013916510387400 Bayazıt, N. T., Küçükçifçi, S. and Şan, B. (2011). İlköğretim okullarında gürültüden rahatsızlığın alan çalışmalarına bağlı olarak saptanması. ITU Journal Series A: Architecture, Planning, Design, 10(2). Bilal, F. (2009). Okullarda akustik düzenleme ve gürültü. Yalıtım Dergisi, 78, 66-67.
  2. Buch, M. and Frieling, E. (2001). Belastungs- und Beanspruchungsoptimierung in Kindertagesstätten. Kassel: Eigenverlag Universität Kassel, Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft. Bulunuz, M. (2021). Okulda gürültü kirliliği: Çözüm için faaliyetler ve projeler. Bursa: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi Müdürlüğü. Bulunuz, M. and Güner, F. (2017). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre okulda gürültü düzeyinin değerlendirilmesi: Fransa ve Türkiye örneği. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(35), 69-87. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.12357 Bulunuz, M. and Özgür, K. (yayın aşamasında). Öğrenme ortamlarında ses ve gürültü kirliliğine ilişkin ebeveyn görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Bulunuz, M., Bulunuz, N. and Tuncal, J. K. (2017a). Akustik iyileştirme yapılmış bir okulda gürültü düzeyinin değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 13(4), 637-658. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/356541
  3. Bulunuz, M., Bulunuz, N., Tavşanlı, Ö. F., Orbak, A. Y. and Mutlu, N. (2018). İlkokullarda gürültü kirliliğinin düzeyi, etkileri ve kontrol edilmesine yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(3), 661-671. doi: 10.2