Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

TESTING THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS FOR BRICS: EVIDENCE FROM THE FOURIER UNIT ROOT AND COINTEGRATION TEST

BRICS İÇİN SATIN ALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİ HİPOTEZİNİN TEST EDİLMESİ: FOURIER BİRİM KÖK VE EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME TESTİNDEN KANIT

Pages
1394–1406
Publication Date
2021-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, it is understood that the purchasing power parity theory applies for all five countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is a review of the purchasing power parity hypothesis applied to BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The series were found to be stationary at level I(1), paving the way for the Fourier Shin cointegration test, which constituted the second stage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, it is understood that the purchasing power parity theory applies for all five countries.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi · Fourier Birim Kök Testi · Fourier Eşbütünleşme Testi

Abstract

This study is a review of the purchasing power parity hypothesis applied to BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). For each country, time series based on a Fourier perspective were applied. The initial stages of the study analyzed the stationarity of the series using Fourier unit root testing. The series were found to be stationary at level I(1), paving the way for the Fourier Shin cointegration test, which constituted the second stage. The analysis revealed cointegration associations with all BRICS countries. Hence, it is understood that the purchasing power parity theory applies for all five countries.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, BRICS (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin ve Güney Afrika) ülkelerinin satın alma gücü paritesi teorisi incelenmiştir. Her ülke için Fourier yaklaşımı içeren zaman serisi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk aşamasında serilerin durağanlıkları Fourier KPSS testi kullanılmıştır. Seriler I(1) düzeyinde durağan oldukları tespit edilerek ikinci aşama olan Fourier Shin eşbütünleşme testine geçilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucu tüm BRICS ülkelerinde eşbütünleşme ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Böylece bu beş ülkede satın alma gücü paritesi teorisinin geçerli olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖVDELİ, T., SUMER, S. (2021). TESTING THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS FOR BRICS: EVIDENCE FROM THE FOURIER UNIT ROOT AND COINTEGRATION TEST. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1394–1406. https://ajindex.com/articles/397035

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Andre, C., M., Balcilar, T. Chang, L. A. Gil-Alana, and R. Gupta. 2017. “Current Account Sustainability in G7 and BRICS: Evidence from a LONG-Memory Model with Structural Breaks.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 1-17. doi:10.1080/09638199.2017.1410853. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., and O. Ranjbar. 2016. “Quantile Unit Root Test and PPP: Evidence from 23 OECD Countries.” Applied Economics 48, 2899-2911. doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1130794. Balassa, B. 1964. “The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal.” Journal of political Economy 72 (6): 584-596. doi:10.1086/258965. Becker, R., W. Enders, and J. Lee. 2006. “A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 27 (3): 381-409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x. Bergin, P. R., R. Glick, and J. L. Wu. 2017. ““Conditional PPP” and Real Exchange Rate Convergence in the Euro Area.” Journal of International Money and Finance 73: 78-92. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.02.005. Cassel, G. 1918. “Abnormal Deviations in International Exchanges.” The Economic Journal 28 (112): 413-415. doi:10.2307/2223329. Chang, H. L., C. W. Su, M. N. Zhu, and P. Liu. 2010. “Long-run purchasing power parity and asymmetric adjustment in BRICs.” Applied Economics Letters 17 (11): 1083-1087. doi:10.1080/00036840902817458. Chang, T., C. H. Lee, and K. Hung. 2012. “Can the PPP Stand on the BRICS? The ADL Test for Threshold Cointegration.” Applied Economics Letters 19 (12): 1123-1127. doi:10.1080/13504851.2011.615727. Chen, F. C. 2017. “Purchasing Power Parity and Nonlinear Real Exchange Rate Adjustment: Evidence From High-Growth Countries.” Taiwan Economic Review 45 (2): 195-224. doi:10.6277/ter.2017.452.1. Drine, I., and C. Rault. 2008. “Purchasing Power Parity for Developing and Developed Countries. What Can We Learn From Non‐Stationary Panel Data Models?.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (4): 752-773. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00548.x. Eslamloueyan, K., and A. Kia. 2015. “Determinants of the Real Exchange Rate in Oil-Producing Countries of the Middle East and North Africa: A Panel Data Investigation.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 51(4): 842-855. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1043213. Fleissig, A. and J. Strauss. 2000. “Panel Unit-Root Tests of Purchasing Power Parity for Price Indices”. Journal of International Money and Finance 19: 489-506. doi:10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00017-6.
  2. Gallant, R. 1981. “On the Basis in Flexible Functional Form and an Essentially