Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

HISTORY EDUCATION FOR DISADVANTAGED GROUPS IN THEORY AND INPRACTICE

Journal
IOJET
Pages
1291–1311
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that history curriculum included indirect emphases about the disadvantaged groups and history teachers were given the responsibility for the inclusion of students with different qualities in learning processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many individuals have been considered in disadvantaged group status due to their specific qualities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, 11 history teachers were interviewed in 2019 with the semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher and the data obtained were analysed via content analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that history curriculum included indirect emphases about the disadvantaged groups and history teachers were given the responsibility for the inclusion of students with different qualities in learning processes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Many individuals have been considered in disadvantaged group status due to their specific qualities. These individuals’ participation in educational processes requires a special effort. This study is to evaluate history curriculum in theory in terms of disadvantaged groups and to learn history teachers’ opinions considering their approaches and experiences towards the disadvantaged groups in practice. The study adopted qualitative research method and it was designed as case study. Firstly, history curriculum was examined and the statements about disadvantaged groups in the curriculum were explained via descriptive analysis. Then, 11 history teachers were interviewed in 2019 with the semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher and the data obtained were analysed via content analysis. It was found that history curriculum included indirect emphases about the disadvantaged groups and history teachers were given the responsibility for the inclusion of students with different qualities in learning processes. It was determined in the interviews carried out with teachers that they had limited knowledge about the disadvantaged group and the individuals in this group, what they understood from the concept was multi-cultural individuals and the disabled, communication was the biggest problem experienced with the disadvantaged students, and teachers carried out mostly student-centered activities in order to overcome such obstacles. Disadvantaged status is not a condition that is usually in an individual’s power. Ina addition to this, education is the right of these individuals. The disadvantaged students must be enabled to engage in educational processes more effectively. History courses are the available field in this regard. Studies must be carried out about the effective and active participation of disadvantaged groups in history education activities. The good examples in Turkey and in the world must be followed and the researchers and educators must gain an access to these examples.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUMUŞ, O. (2022). HISTORY EDUCATION FOR DISADVANTAGED GROUPS IN THEORY AND INPRACTICE. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1291–1311. https://ajindex.com/articles/39684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alexander, C., Weekes-Bernard, D. ve Chatterji, J. (2015). History lessons: Teaching diversity in and through the history national curriculum. London: Runnymede Trust. Amthor, R. F & Roxas, K. (2016). Multicultural education and newcomer youth: Re-Imagining a more inclusive vision for immigrant and refugee students, Educational Studies, 52 (2), 155-176.
  2. Apaydın, Ç. & Gebizli, O. (2015). İlkokul yöneticilerinin parçalanmış aileye sahip öğrencilerle yaşadıkları sorunların incelenmesi [An investigation of elementary school directors’ problems experienced with the students of the fragmented families]. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Research in Education and Teaching], 6 (1), 352-368.
  3. Arastaman, G., Öztürk-Fidan, İ. & Öztürk, T. (2018). Nitel araştırmada geçerlik ve güvenirlik: Kuramsal bir inceleme [Reliability and validity in qualitative research: An institutional examination]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [YYU Journal of Education Faculty], 15 (1), 37-75.
  4. Bahadır, U. (2018). Göçmen ve sığınmacıların eğitimden dışlanması sorunu [The issue of deprivation of immigrants and refugees from education]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Akdeniz University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Antalya. Bozok, N. (2011).
  5. Ben değerliyim, Nar taneleri: Güçlü genç kadınlar mutlu yarınlar projesi [I am valuable, Pomegranate Seeds: The project of strong young women happiest]. ($1^{th}$ Edition). İstanbul:
  6. Boyner. Burcu, E. (2017). Türkiye’de engelli bireylerin dezavantajlı konumlarına engellilik sosyolojisinin eleştirel tavrıyla bakmak [To Regard the disabled individuals’ disadvantaged conditions via critical approach of disabled sociology]. Toplum ve Demokrasi [Society and Democracy], 11 (24), 107-125.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. (12th Edition). Ankara:
  8. Pegem. Caillods, F. (1998). Education strategies for disadvantaged groups: Some basic ideas. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning. Deutsch, C. P. (1965). Education for disadvantaged groups. Review of Educational Research, 35 (2), 140-146.
  9. Doğan, İ. (2016). Sosyoloji kavramlar ve sorunlar [Sociology concepts and problems]. ($14^{th}$ Edition). Ankara: Pegem. Education of Disadvantaged Groups and Multiple Class Teaching: Studies and Innovative Approaches. Report of a Study Group Meeting (Jakarta, Moveaber 17-26, 1080). Asian Programme of Educational