Journals / Gıda / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Determining the Amount of Total Phenolic Compounds of some Vegetables Frequently Used in Our Society (Turkish with English Abstract)

Toplumumuzda Sıklıkla Kullanılan Bazı Bitkilerin Toplam Fenolik Madde Miktarlarının Saptanması

Journal
Gıda
Pages
23–29
Publication Date
2013-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore the consumption of these foods will be provided with the most beneficial effect, if pay attention to the diversity of food and use appropriate methods for cooking and storage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is known that some foods have some beneficial effects especially on age-related diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The range for dry matter rate in vegetables was 2.97% - 13.06% and the highest amount of dry matter was parsley.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore the consumption of these foods will be provided with the most beneficial effect, if pay attention to the diversity of food and use appropriate methods for cooking and storage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Toplam fenolik madde · Folin-Ciocalteu’s · kuru madde

Abstract

It is known that some foods have some beneficial effects especially on age-related diseases. These beneficial effects come from biologically active compounds into food. The most common biologically active compounds are phenolic compounds and they have strong antioxidant activities. The purpose of this study is to determine the amount of total phenolic compounds of some plants in our society are often consumed. For this reason amount of dry total phenol content of mint, lepidium sativum, eruca sativa, rumex acetosa, portulaca oleracea, chicory, dill and parsley purchased from local markets was determined. The range for dry matter rate in vegetables was 2.97% - 13.06% and the highest amount of dry matter was parsley. The range for total phenolic concentrations in vegetables was 1091.23 - 4201.75 mg/kg (chicory- mint). Among the vegetables studied, the highest total phenolic compound was calculated in the mint, followed by dill > parsley > rumex acetosa > eruca sativa > portulaca oleracea > lepidium sativum > chicory. The variety and amount of phenolic compounds into food depending on maturity of the plant, environmental factors and methods of food processing and storage. Therefore the consumption of these foods will be provided with the most beneficial effect, if pay attention to the diversity of food and use appropriate methods for cooking and storage.

Özet

Bazı besinlerin, özellikle dejeneratif hastalıklar üzerinde yararlı etkileri olduğu ve etkilerinin temel olarak içlerinde bulunan biyoaktif bileşenlerden ileri geldiği düşünülmektedir. Bu biyoaktif bileşenlerden en yaygını olan fenolik bileşikler kuvvetli antioksidan aktiviteye sahiptirler. Çalışmamızda toplumumuzda sıklıkla tüketilen bazı bitkilerin toplam fenolik madde miktarlarını belirlemek amacı ile semt pazarından satın alınan maydanoz, tere, roka, kuzukulağı, dereotu, nane, semizotu ve radikanın kuru madde ve toplam fenolik madde miktarları incelenmiştir. Sebzelerin kuru madde miktarlarının %2.97 ile %13.06 arasında değiştiği ve kuru madde miktarı en yüksek olan sebzenin maydanoz olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sebzelerin toplam fenolik madde konsantrasyonları 1091.23- 4201.75 mg/kg arasında değişmektedir. En yüksek fenolik madde içeriğine sahip olan sebze nanedir. Naneyi azalan sırayla dereotu, maydanoz, kuzukulağı, roka, semizotu, tere ve radika takip etmiştir. Besinlerdeki fenolik maddeler bitkinin olgunluğuna, çevresel faktörlere, besinin işlenmesi ve saklanması gibi yöntemlere bağlı olarak değişiklik gösterdiğinden bu besinlerin tüketiminde besin çeşitliliğine dikkat edilerek, uygun pişirme ve saklama yöntemlerinin kullanılması ile en yararlı etkinin sağlanacağı unutulmamalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYAR, B. B., GEZMEN-KARADAĞ, M., ŞANLIER, N., GÜNYEL, S. (2013). Determining the Amount of Total Phenolic Compounds of some Vegetables Frequently Used in Our Society (Turkish with English Abstract). Gıda, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/39545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. De La Rosa Carrillo LA, Alvarez-Parilla E, Gonzalez-Aguilar GA. 2010. Fruit and vegetable phytochemicals: Chemistry, nutritional value and stability. Blacwell Publishing Ltd. Oxford, UK. 2. Liu RH. 2004. Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: Mechanism of action. J Nutrition, 134, 3479-3485.
  2. Espin JC, Garcia-Conesa MT, Tomas-Barberan FA. 2007. Nutraceuticals: Facts and Fiction. Phytochemistry, 68, 2986-3008.
  3. Tripathi K, Mishra AS. 2007. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: A review. Anim Feed Sci and Technol, 132, 1-27.
  4. Bowman BA, Russell RM. 2001. Present knowledge in nutrition. 8. Edition,
  5. ILSI Press,
  6. Washington, DC. Kris- E PM, Hecker KD, Bonanome A, Coval SM, Binkoski AE, Hilpert KF, Griel AE, Etherton TD. 2002. Bioactive compounds in foods: Their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Am J Med, 113(9B), 71-88. Bravo LB. 1998. Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance. Nutr Rev, 56, 317–333. Pietta PG. 2000. Flavonoids as Antioxidants. J Nat Prot, 63, 1035-42.
  7. Kris E, Lefevre M, Beecher GR, Gros MD, Keen CL, Etherton TD. 2004. Bioactive compounds in nutrition and health-research methodologies for establishing biological function: The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids on atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Nutr, 24, 511-538.
  8. Hans-Konrad B, Lars OD, Ibrahim E, Rolf G, Michael M, Dieter S, Walter P, Weber P. 2009. Bioactive compounds: Definition and assessment of activity. Nutrition, 25, 1202-1205.
  9. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C. 2004. Polyphenols:food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr, 79, 727-747.
  10. Tapiero H, Tew KD, Ba GN, Mathe G. 2002. Polyphenols: do they play a role in the prevention of human pathologies. Biomed Pharmacother, 56, 200-207.
  11. Kahkönen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ. 1999. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem, 47, 3954-62.
  12. Bhattacharya A, Sood P, Citovsky V. 2010. The roles of plant phenolics in defence and communication during Agrobacterium and Rhizobium infection. Mol Plant Pathol, 11, 705-719. 15. Borchardt JR, Wyse DL, Sheaffer CC, Kauppi KL, Fulcher RG, Ehlke NJ, Biesboer DD, Bey RF. 2008. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of seed from plants of the Mississippi river basin. J Med Plants Res, 2, 81-93. Bowden GH. 1999. Controlled environment model for accumulation of biofilms of oral bacteria. Methods Enzymol, 310, 216-224.
  13. Gibney M, Macdonald IA, Roche HM. 2003. Nutrition and Metabol