Journals / Gıda / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

Chemical and Microbial Differences in Dried Apricots Containing Sulfur Dioxide at Different Levels (in English)

Farklı Düzeyde SO2 İçeren Kuru Kayısılardaki Kimyasal ve Mikrobiyel Farklılıklar (İngilizce)

Journal
Gıda
Pages
275–282
Publication Date
2013-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although 188 mg SO2 per kg of DAs is sufficient SO2 concentration with respect to browning color and microbial load right after drying, DAs should contain minimum 791 mg SO2/kg to protect the initial β-carotene content.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentrations (0, 188, 452, 791, 1034, 1236, 2899 and 3864 mg SO2/kg) on the physical, chemical and microbiological qualities of dried apricots (DAs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Strong correlations were determined between SO2 concentration with pH (r = ‒ 0.913), titratable acidity values (r = 0.983), browning values (r = – 0.981) and β-carotene contents (r = 0.822) of DAs (P<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although 188 mg SO2 per kg of DAs is sufficient SO2 concentration with respect to browning color and microbial load right after drying, DAs should contain minimum 791 mg SO2/kg to protect the initial β-carotene content.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kuru kayısı · SO2 düzeyi · esmerleşme

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentrations (0, 188, 452, 791, 1034, 1236, 2899 and 3864 mg SO2/kg) on the physical, chemical and microbiological qualities of dried apricots (DAs). Non-sulfited DAs were evaluated as a control group. Strong correlations were determined between SO2 concentration with pH (r = ‒ 0.913), titratable acidity values (r = 0.983), browning values (r = – 0.981) and β-carotene contents (r = 0.822) of DAs (P<0.05). The number of total psycrophilic aerobic bacteria (TPAB), lactic acid bacteria, yeast and mold, xerophilic mould, Staphylococcus spp., and total Enterobacteriaceae were below the detection limit (<0.6 log cfu/g) in samples containing SO2 even at the lowest level (188 mg SO2/kg). Although 188 mg SO2 per kg of DAs is sufficient SO2 concentration with respect to browning color and microbial load right after drying, DAs should contain minimum 791 mg SO2/kg to protect the initial β-carotene content.

Özet

Bu çalışma; kuru kayısıların, fiziksel, kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik özellikleri üzerine farklı kükürt dioksit (SO2) konsantrasyonlarının (0, 188, 452, 791, 1034, 1236, 2899 and 3864 mg SO2/kg) etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Kükürt içermeyen kuru kayısı örnekleri kontrol grubu olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Kuru kayısıların içerdiği SO2 konsantrasyonu ile pH (r = ‒ 0.913), titrasyon asitliği (r = 0.983), esmerleşme değerleri (r = – 0.981) ve β-karoten miktarları (r = 0.822) arasında güçlü korelasyonlar tespit edilmiştir (P<0.05). En düşük düzeyde SO2 içeren (188 mg SO2/kg) örnekte dahi toplam psikrofilik bakteri, laktik asit bakterisi, Staphylococcus spp., toplam Enterobacteriaceae, kserofilik küf ile toplam küf ve maya sayıları tespit limitlerinin (<0.6 log kob/g) altındadır. Kurutma sonrasında 188 mg/kg düzeyindeki SO2 konsantrasyonu, esmer renk ve mikrobiyel yük açısından yeterli olmasına rağmen, başlangıçtaki β-karoten miktarını korumak için gerekli olan en düşük SO2 konsantrasyonu 791 mg/kg’dır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKYILMAZ, M., TAĞI, Ş., ÖZKAN, M., ÖZTÜRK, K., ÖZTÜRK, B. (2013). Chemical and Microbial Differences in Dried Apricots Containing Sulfur Dioxide at Different Levels (in English). Gıda, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 275–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/39511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. FAOSTAT. 2011. FAOSTAT Statistical database. http://faostat.fao.org (Accessed 01 June 2013) Asma BM. 2011. Her yönüyle kayısı (Apricots in all aspects). Uyum Ajans, Ankara, Turkey, 45 p. Ough CS. 1993. Sulphur dioxide and sulphites. In: Antimicrobials in Foods. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, USA, pp. 137-190.
  2. Russell NJ, Gould GW. 2003. Sulfite, in food preservatives. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher,
  3. New York, USA, 380 p. Latapi G, Barrett DM. 2006. Influence of re–drying treatments on quality and safety of sun–dried tomatoes. Part I: Use of steam blanching, boiling brine blanching, and dips in salt or sodium metabisulfite. J Food Sci, 71 (1): 24-31. Codex Alimentarius Commission. 198). Food Additives. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Rome, Italy. Taylor SL, Higley NA, Bush RK. 1986. Sulphites in foods: Uses, analytical methods, residues, fate, exposure assessment, metabolism, toxicity and hypersensitivity. Adv Food Res, 30 (1): 1-76. IFT Expert Panel. 1986. Sulfites as food ingredients. Food Technol, 40 (6): 47-52.
  4. Sadegh C, Schreck RP. 2003. The spectroscopic determination of aqueous sulfite using ellman’s reagent. Reports, 8 (1): 39-43. Taylor SL. 1993. Why sulfite alternatives. Food Technol,47 (10): 14. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC, Gaithersburg, USA. Reith JF, Willems JJL. 1958. Über die bestimmung der schwefligen säure in lebensmitteln. Z Lebensm Unters For,108 (3): 270-280.
  5. Franzke CL, Grunert KS, Glowacz S, Kutschan R. 1968. Zur Bestimmung geringer Mengen schefliger Saure in Lebensmitteln. Z Lebensm Unters For,160 (1): 13-20.
  6. Baloch AK, Buckle KA, Edwards RA. 1973. Measurement of non-enzymic browning of dehydrated carrot. J Sci Food Agr, 24 (4): 389-398.
  7. Özkan M, Cemero¤lu B. 2002. Desulfiting dried apricots by hot air flow. J Sci Food Agr, 82 (15): 1823-1828.
  8. Sadler G, Davis J, Dezman D. 1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and E-carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J Food Sci, 55 (5): 1460-1461. Mackey BM. 2000. Injured bacteria. In: The Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food, Lund BM, Baird–Parker TC, Gould GW (eds), Aspen Publisher Inc, Gaithersburg, USA, pp. 315-341. APHA (American Public Health Association). 1992. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. APHA, Washington, USA. Codex Standard For Dried Apricots. 1981. Codex Stan. 130-1981.
  9. Davis EG, McBean DMcG, Rooney ML, Gipps PG. 1973. Mechanisms o