Journals / Türk Dermatoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Confusing Acquired Macular Pigmentation of Unknown Etiology in Children: Retrospective Analysis of 10 Years in Single Tertiary Center

Pages
35–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Such a terminology might allow that these disorders may be compared with a collective terminology in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acquired Macular Hyperpigmentation: Ashy dermatosis (AD), lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP), erythema dyschromicum perstans (EDP), and idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation (IEMP) are the spectrum of acquired macular pigmentation of unknown etiology (MPUE).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Aretrospective chart review of 23 pediatric cases that had applied to the dermatology unit between the years 2007 and 2017 and diagnosed with any of the acquired macular pigmentation was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Such a terminology might allow that these disorders may be compared with a collective terminology in the literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Acquired Macular Hyperpigmentation: Ashy dermatosis (AD), lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP), erythema dyschromicum perstans (EDP), and idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation (IEMP) are the spectrum of acquired macular pigmentation of unknown etiology (MPUE). The aim of this study is to investigate and reevaluate our pediatric patients who had clinically and histopathologically been diagnosed with aforementioned disorders, in consideration of the global consensus statement on acquired MPUE. Materials and Methods: Aretrospective chart review of 23 pediatric cases that had applied to the dermatology unit between the years 2007 and 2017 and diagnosed with any of the acquired macular pigmentation was performed. Results: Of 23 patients, 16 were diagnosed with AD, 4 with LPP, and 3 with IEMP. In AD patients, major site of presentation at onset was the trunk (13/16) and brownish (15/16) were the most prominent coloring. Dermal melanophages (16/16), perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate (14/16), and pigment incontinence (7/16) were the most prominent features. Upper limbs (3/4) were the most predilection area in LPP patients. Perivascular lymphohistiocytic (4/4), lichenoid infiltration (3/4), basal vacuolar degeneration (4/4), and dermal melanophages (4/4) were observed. The trunk was the major site of presentation (3/3) in IEMP patients. Brownish (2/3) and ashen-gray (1/3) was the coloring of lesions. Basal layer pigmentation (3/3) and dermal melanophages (3/3) were the most prominent findings. No basal vacuolar changes (0/3) were observed. Conclusion: Clinical and histopathological distinction between these conditions is challenging. We reevaluated our patients in this context. We predict that we have achieved more accurate terminology with the global consensus statement. Such a terminology might allow that these disorders may be compared with a collective terminology in the literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUNDAK, S., ÇAKIR, Y. (2020). Confusing Acquired Macular Pigmentation of Unknown Etiology in Children: Retrospective Analysis of 10 Years in Single Tertiary Center. Türk Dermatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 35–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/394940

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Udompanich S, Vachiramon V. Acquired macular pigmentation of unknown etiology. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2019;12:38-46
  2. Ghosh A, Coondoo A. Lichen planus pigmentosus: The controversial consensus. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:482-6
  3. Kumarasinghe SP, Pandya A, Chandran V, Rodrigues M, Dlova NC, Kang HY, et al. A global consensus statement on ashy dermatosis, erythema dyschromicum perstans, lichen planus pigmentosus, idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation, and Riehl’s melanosis. Int J Dermatol 2019;58:263-72
  4. Chang SE, Kim HW, Shin JM, Lee JH, Na JI, Roh MR, et al. Clinical and histological aspect of erythema dyschromicum perstans in Korea: A review of 68 cases. J Dermatol 2015;42:1053-7
  5. Zaynoun S, Rubeiz N, Kibbi AG. Ashy dermatoses-a critical review of the literature and a proposed simplified clinical classification. Int J Dermatol 2008;47:542-4
  6. Joshi RS, Rohatgi S. Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation: A critical review of published literature and suggestions for revision of criteria for diagnosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:576-80
  7. Cutrì FT, Ruocco E, Pettinato G, Ciancia G. Lichen planus pigmentosus-like ashy dermatosis. Dermatol Reports 2011;3:e46.8. Joshi R. Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation with papillomatosis: Report of nine cases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007;73:402-5
  8. Numata T, Harada K, Tsuboi R, Mitsuhashi Y. Erythema dyschromicum perstans: Identical to ashy dermatosis or not? Case Rep Dermatol 2015;7:146-50
  9. Chandran V, Kumarasinghe SP. Macular pigmentation of uncertain aetiology revisited: Two case reports and a proposed algorithm for clinical classification. Australas J Dermatol 2017;58:45-9
  10. Grover S, Basu A. Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation: Report on two cases. Indian J Dermatol 2010;55:277-8
  11. Robles-Méndez JC, Rizo-Frías P, Herz-Ruelas ME, Pandya AG, Ocampo Candiani J. Lichen planus pigmentosus and its variants: Review and update. Int J Dermatol 2018;57:505-14
  12. Vasani RJ. Idiopathic eruptive macular pigmentation – Uncommon presentation of an uncommon condition. Indian J Dermatol 2018;63:409-11
  13. Leung N, Oliveira M, Selim MA, McKinley-Grant L, Lesesky E. Erythema dyschromicum perstans: A case report and systematic review of histologic presentation and treatment. Int J Womens Dermatol 2018;4:216-22
  14. Convit J, Kerdel-Vegas F, Rodriguez G. Erythema dyschromicum perstans: A hitherto undescribed skin disease. J Invest Dermatol 1961;36:459-62
  15. Ramirez C