Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6

Performances of sequential denitrification and partial nitrification process for treatment of landfill leachate

Çöp sızıntı suyu arıtımı için denitrifikasyon ve kısmi nitrifikasyon proseslerinin performansı

Pages
737–743
Publication Date
2021-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study suggest that use of sequential denitrification/partial nitrification is an effective way to remove COD and ammonium from raw LFL However, additional treatment methods to this sequential system can be applied as pretreatment and/or post treatment for achieving the desired water quality because effluent TN and COD values are still not meet with the discharge standards of 40 mg N/L and 600 mg COD/L.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at investigating the sequential denitrification and the partial nitrification performance of anoxic moving bed reactor (AnoxMBBR)-aerobic sequencing batch reactor (AeSBR) to remove ammonium-nitrogen from landfill leachate (LFL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, AnoxMBBR and AeSBR were set-up and operated at a cycle time of 48-h.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study suggest that use of sequential denitrification/partial nitrification is an effective way to remove COD and ammonium from raw LFL However, additional treatment methods to this sequential system can be applied as pretreatment and/or post treatment for achieving the desired water quality because effluent TN and COD values are still not meet with the discharge standards of 40 mg N/L and 600 mg COD/L.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Denitrifikasyon · Çöp sızıntı suyu · Kısmi nitrifikasyon

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the sequential denitrification and the partial nitrification performance of anoxic moving bed reactor (AnoxMBBR)-aerobic sequencing batch reactor (AeSBR) to remove ammonium-nitrogen from landfill leachate (LFL). For this purpose, AnoxMBBR and AeSBR were set-up and operated at a cycle time of 48-h. The both reactor performances were evaluated by chemical oxygen demand (COD), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), inorganic carbon (IC), ammonium (NH4 +), nitrite (NO2 -), nitrate (NO3 -), total nitrogen (TN), color (Pt-Co and RES) and pH parameters. Additionally, the AeSBR performance was evaluated in terms of free ammonium (FA) and free nitrous acid (FNA) concentrations. In the sequential system, total removal efficiency of COD and ammonium was about 75% and 65%, respectively. In AnoxMBBR, also, NO3 - removal efficiency was about 55%. The partial nitrification was successfully occurred in AeSBR and the nitrite accumulation at 24-h and 48-h was about 1630.16 and 1702.92 mg/L, respectively. The results of this study suggest that use of sequential denitrification/partial nitrification is an effective way to remove COD and ammonium from raw LFL However, additional treatment methods to this sequential system can be applied as pretreatment and/or post treatment for achieving the desired water quality because effluent TN and COD values are still not meet with the discharge standards of 40 mg N/L and 600 mg COD/L.

Özet

Bu çalışma, çöp sızıntı sularından amonyum-azotun giderimi için ardışık anoksik hareketli yatak biofilm (AnoxHYBR) ve aerobik ardışık kesikli(AeAKR) reaktörün performansını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç için, AnoxHYBR ve AeAKR 48 sa.’lik döngü süresinde işletilmiştir. Her iki reaktör performansı kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı (KOİ), çözünmüş organik karbon (ÇOK), inorganik karbon (İK), amonyum (NH4 +), nitrit (NO2 -), nitrat (NO3 -), toplam azot (TA) renk (Pt-Co ve RES) ve pH parametreleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Ek olarak, AeAKR performansı serbest amonyum (SA) ve serbest nitröz asit (SNA) konsantrasyonları açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Ardışık sistemdekitoplam KOİ ve amonyumun giderim verimi sırasıyla %75 ve %65, AnoxHYBR'de NO3 - giderim verimi yaklaşık %55 olarak elde edilmiştir. AeAKR'de başarılı bir kısmi nitrifikasyon prosesi gerçekleştirilerek 24 sa. ve 48 sa.’lik hidrolik bekletme süresinde sırasıyla yaklaşık 1630.16 ve 1702.92 mg/L nitrit birikimi gözlemlenmiştir. Bu çalışma, ardışık denitrifikasyon/kısmi nitrifikasyon kullanımının, ham çöp sızıntı suyundan KOİ ve amonyumun giderimi için etkili bir yol olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak, deşarj standartlarına uygun çıkış su kalitesini elde etmek için ön ve/veya son arıtım olarak ilave arıtma yöntemleri uygulanması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUYAR, A., CIFTCIOGLU, V., CIVELEKOGLU, G., CIRIK, K. (2021). Performances of sequential denitrification and partial nitrification process for treatment of landfill leachate. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 737–743. https://ajindex.com/articles/394898

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F, Moulin P. “Landfill leachate treatment: review and a opportunity”. Journal of hazardous materials, 150(3), 468-493, 2008
  2. Calabrò PS, Gentili E, Meoni C, Orsi S, Komilis D. “Effect of the recirculation of a reverse osmosis concentrate on leachate generation: A case study in an Italian landfill”. Waste Management, 76, 643-651, 2018
  3. El-Fadel M, Findikakis AN, Leckie JO. “Modeling leachate generation and transport in solid waste landfills”. Environmental technology, 18(7), 669-686, 1997
  4. Alimba CG, Bakare AA. “In vivo micronucleus test in the assessment of cytogenotoxicity of landfill leachates in three animal models from various ecological habitats”. Ecotoxicology, 25(2), 310-319, 2016
  5. The World Bank. “Solid Waste Management Brief”. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopmen t/brief/solid-waste-management (08.10.2020)
  6. Kulikowska D, Klimiuk E. “The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition”. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5981-5985, 2008
  7. Chofqi A., Younsi A, Lhadi EK, Mania J, Mudry J, Veron A. “Environmental impact of an urban landfill on a coastal aquifer (El Jadida, Morocco)”. Journal of African earth sciences, 39(3-5), 509-516, 2004
  8. Slack RJ, Gronow JR, Voulvoulis N. “Household hazardous waste in municipal landfills: contaminants in leachate”. Science of the total environment, 337(1-3), 119-137, 2005
  9. Hongjiang LI, Youcai ZHAO, Lei SHI, Yingying GU. “Threestage aged refuse biofilter for the treatment of landfill leachate”. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(1), 70-75, 2009
  10. Eggen T, Moeder M, Arukwe A. “Municipal landfill leachates: a significant source for new and emerging pollutants”. Science of the Total Environment, 408(21), 5147-5157, 2010
  11. Zainol NA, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS. “Characterization of Leachate from Kuala Sepetang and Kulim landfills: a comparative study”. Energy and Environment Research, 2(2), 45-52, 2012
  12. Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TBS, Srinath EG. “Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid”. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), 835-852, 1976
  13. Van Hulle SW, Volcke EI, Teruel JL, Donckels B, van Loosdrecht MC, Vanrolleghem PA. “Influence of temperature and pH on the kinetics of the Sharon nitritation process”. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental & Clean Technology, 82(5), 471-480, 2007
  14. Bashir MJ, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS,