Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

COURSE OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS IN THE ELDERLY EVALUATED WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN

Pages
326–333
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, multidisciplinary approach and close follow-up with monitoring is crucial in geriatric patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In our study, we aimed to evaluate how age affects the severity and course of acute pancreatitis according to the modified Balthazar scoring system.Materials and methods: 354 patients diagnosed with acute-pancreatitis and followed-up in our hospital between July/2013-February/2019 were included our study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Demographic data, comorbid diseases and mortality rates of all patients were documented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, multidisciplinary approach and close follow-up with monitoring is crucial in geriatric patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: In our study, we aimed to evaluate how age affects the severity and course of acute pancreatitis according to the modified Balthazar scoring system.Materials and methods: 354 patients diagnosed with acute-pancreatitis and followed-up in our hospital between July/2013-February/2019 were included our study. Demographic data, comorbid diseases and mortality rates of all patients were documented. Patients with aged 65 and over were assessed as geriatric population. All patients included in the study underwent contrast enhanced abdominal computed-tomography within the first 12 hours and on days 3 to 7. According to the modified Balthazar score, patients with mild, moderate and severe acute-pancreatitis respectively. The relationship between age and computed-tomography findings was analyzed. Results: 206 (58.2%) of the patients included in the study were women. Mean age was 54.8±17.9 years (18-100 years). Geriatric population consisted of 129(36.5%) patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups according to the modified Balthazar classification on the initial computed-tomographies on admission (p>0.05). However, on computed-tomography scans taken after the third day, severe acute-pancreatitis was detected significantly more frequently in the elderly (p<0.05). Additionally, in comparing the disease progression on computed-tomography scans, disease progression was significantly higher in the elderly group (p <0.05). In addition, comorbidity score and mortality rate were found to be significantly higher in the elderly group (p<0.001, p:0042, respectively).Conclusion: In acute pancreatitis, age may have an effect on the severity of the disease. For this reason, multidisciplinary approach and close follow-up with monitoring is crucial in geriatric patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

KONUR, Ş., SÜRMELİ, N., GÜNDÜZ, İ., İLİKLERDEN, Ü. H., DERTLİ, R., KAYAR, Y. (2020). COURSE OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS IN THE ELDERLY EVALUATED WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 326–333. https://ajindex.com/articles/394760

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lankisch PG, Apte M, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2015;386:85–96 (PMID: 25616312)
  2. Singla A, Simons J, Li Y, et al. Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2009;137: 1995–2001. (PMID: 19733570)
  3. Tozlu M, Kayar Y, Ince AT, Baysal B, Senturk H. Low molecular weight heparin treatment of acute moderate and severe pancreatitis: A randomized, controlled, open-label study. Turk J Gastroenterol 2019 Jan;30(1):81-7. (PMID: 30289392)
  4. Abu-Zidan FM, Bonham MJ, Windsor JA. Severity of acutepancreatitis: a multivariate analysis of oxidative stress markers and modified Glasgow criteria. Br J Surg 2000;87:1019–23. (PMID: 10931044)
  5. Goldacre MJ, Roberts SE. Hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an English population, 1963- 98: data base study of incidence and mortality. BMJ 2004;328:1466–9. (PMID: 15205290)
  6. Kayar Y, Senturk H, Tozlu M, Baysal B, Atay M, Ince AT. Prediction of Self-Limited Acute Pancreatitis Cases at Admission to Emergency Unit.GE Port J Gastroenterol 2019 Jul;26(4):251-9. (PMID: 31328139)
  7. Gardner T.B, Santhi Swaroop V, Suresh S.T, et al. The effect of age on hospital outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2008;8:265–70. (PMID: 18497539)
  8. Blamey S.L, Imrie CW, O’Neill J, Gilmour WH, Carter DC. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1984;25:1340–6. (PMID: 6510766)
  9. Ranson JHC, K M Rifkind, D F Roses, S D Fink, K Eng, F C Spencer. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;139:69–81. (PMID: 4834279)
  10. Wilson C, Heath D.I, Imrie C.W. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br. J. Surg 1990;77:1260–4. (PMID: 2253005)
  11. Nguyen BL, Thompson JS, Edney JA. Influence of the etiology of pancreatitis on the natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg 1991;162:527– 530. (PMID: 1670219)
  12. Gullo L, Migliori M, Olah A, et al. Acute pancreatitis in five European countries. Etiol Mortality Pancreas 2002;24:223–7. (PMID: 11893928)
  13. Roulin D, Girardet R, Duran R, et al. Outcome of elderly patients afte acute biliary pancreatitis. Biosci Trends 2018;12:54–9. (PMID: 29553102)
  14. Losurdo G, Iannone A, Principi M, Barone M et al. Acute pancreatitis in elderly patients: A retrospective evaluation at hospital admission. Eur J Intern Med 2016;30:88–93. (PMID: 26806437)
  15. De Beaux A.C, Palm