Journals / Gıda / 2015 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

UTILIZATION OF AGRO-INDUSTRIAL RESIDUES BY SOLID-STATE FERMENTATION: OVERVIEW OF IMPORTANT PROCESSING FACTORS

TARIMA DAYALI SANAYİ ATIKLARININ KATI KÜLTÜR FERMANTASYONU İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SÜRECE ETKİ EDEN FAKTÖRLERE GENEL BAKIŞ

Journal
Gıda
Pages
117–124
Publication Date
2015-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article will enlighten potential researchers dealingwith applied SSF processes as well as the manufacturers concerning in adding value to the agro-industrialresidues

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a very ancient technology employed by the eastern countries, hasattracted the attention of western countries in recent decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A significant part ofthis review concerns some of the important factors affecting the SSF processes such as; inoculum size,incubation time and temperature, moisture content and water activity, initial pH, particle size, agitationand inoculum type.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article will enlighten potential researchers dealingwith applied SSF processes as well as the manufacturers concerning in adding value to the agro-industrialresidues
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Katı-kültür fermantasyonu · tarıma dayalı sanayi atıkları · çevresel etkenler

Abstract

Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a very ancient technology employed by the eastern countries, hasattracted the attention of western countries in recent decades. Due to the engineering and environmentalaspects, solid-state fermentation has shown much promise in the development of several products andbioprocesses; however it is still in competence with the submerged fermentation (SmF) technique. Thisreview covers the definition and brief history of the SSF technique, advantages and limitations of theuse of agro-industrial residues followed by the list of recently used inert supports. A significant part ofthis review concerns some of the important factors affecting the SSF processes such as; inoculum size,incubation time and temperature, moisture content and water activity, initial pH, particle size, agitationand inoculum type. The effect of each factor on SSF processes is not only detailed theoretically but alsodiscussed via specific studies from the literature. This article will enlighten potential researchers dealingwith applied SSF processes as well as the manufacturers concerning in adding value to the agro-industrialresidues

Özet

-

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, H., TARI, C. (2015). UTILIZATION OF AGRO-INDUSTRIAL RESIDUES BY SOLID-STATE FERMENTATION: OVERVIEW OF IMPORTANT PROCESSING FACTORS. Gıda, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 117–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/39442

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bhargav S, Panda BP, Ali M, Javed S. 2008. Solid-state fermentation: an overview. Chem Biochem Eng Q22, 49-70.
  2. Couto SR, Sanroman MA. 2006. Application of solid-state fermentation to food industry. J Food Eng76, 291-302.
  3. Dhillon GS, Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD. 2011. Utilization of different agro-industrial wastes for sustainable bioproduction of citric acid by Aspergillus niger. Biochem Eng J54, 83-92.
  4. Ucuncu C, Tari C, Demir H, Büyükkileci AO, Ozen B. 2013. Dilute-acid hydrolysis of apple, orange, apricot and peach pomaces as potential candidates for bioethanol production. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy7, 376-389.
  5. Camilios-Neto D, Bugay C, Santana-Filho AP, Joslin T, de Souza LM, Sassaki GL, Mitchell DA, Krieger N. 2011. Production of rhamnolipids in solid-state cultivation using a mixture of sugarcane bagasse and corn bran supplemented with glycerol and soybean oil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89, 1395-1403. Demir H. 2012. Production of pectinase from Aspergillus sojaeby solid-state fermentation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Izmir Institute of Technology, Department of Food Engineering, Izmir, Turkey, 206 p. Brijwani K, Vadlani PV. 2011. Cellulolytic enzymes production via solid-state fermentation: effect of pretreatment methods on physicochemical characteristics of substrate. Enz Res doi:10.4061/ 2011/860134. Singhania RR, Soccol CR, Pandey A. 2008. Application of tropical agro-industrial residues as substrate for solid-state fermentation processes. In: Current developments in solid-state fermentation, Pandey A, Larroche C, Soccol CR (eds). Springer, Delhi, pp 412-442.
  6. Antoine AA, Jacqueline D, Thonart P. 2010. Xylanase production by Penicillium canescens on soya oil cake in solid-state fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160, 50-62.
  7. Chaari F, Kamoun A, Bhiri F, Blibech M, Ellouze- Ghorbel R, Ellouz-Chaabouni S. 2012. Statistical optimization for the production of lichenase by a newly isolated Bacillus licheniformis UEB CF in solid state fermentation using pea pomace as a novel solid support. Ind Crops Prod 40, 192-198. 11. Gassara F, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, Verma M, Surampalli RY. 2010. Screening of agro-industrial wastes to produce ligninolytic enzymes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biochem Eng J 49, 388-394.
  8. Madeira Jr JV, Macedo JA, Macedo GA. 2011. Detoxification of castor bean residues and the simultaneous production of tannase and phytase by solid-state fermentation using Paecilomyces variotii. Bioresour Technol 102, 7343-7348.
  9. Mazaheri D, Shojaosadati SA, Mousav