Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Epistaxis in geriatric patients

Pages
133–136
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It must be evaluated carefully to avoid the potential complications resulting from both epistaxis and its associated disorders, especially in geriatric patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Epistaxis is a common emergency in otolaryngology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to analyze the etiology, management, and accompanying disorders of epistaxis in geriatric patients by reviewing the literature Materials and methods: Data of 117 patients 65 years old and older who presented to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology with active epistaxis between 2004 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It must be evaluated carefully to avoid the potential complications resulting from both epistaxis and its associated disorders, especially in geriatric patients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Key words: Epistaxis · cauterization · Key words: Epistaxis

Abstract

Epistaxis is a common emergency in otolaryngology. The aim of this study is to analyze the etiology, management, and accompanying disorders of epistaxis in geriatric patients by reviewing the literature Materials and methods: Data of 117 patients 65 years old and older who presented to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology with active epistaxis between 2004 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were evaluated for age, sex, accompanying disorders, drug medication, detailed otorhinolaryngological findings, and management of epistaxis. Results: There were 67 women (57.26%) and 50 men (42.74%) with a mean age of 73.51 years (range: 65–90). Ninety-four (80.34%) patients had accompanying disorders such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, sinusitis, chronic obstructive lung disease, nasal polyp, and drug treatment. The bleeding site was anterior in 90 patients (76.92%) and posterior in 16 (13.67%). In 11 patients (9.4%), the bleeding site was not identified. Fifty-seven patients (48.71%) were treated with cauterization, 17 patients (14.52%) with nasal packing, 12 patients (10.25%) with medical treatment, 1 patient (0.85%) with mass excision and nasal packing, and 19 patients (16.23%) with more than 1 treatment method. Six patients (5.12%) were untreated because of the unidentified bleeding point. Bleeding control was performed under local anesthesia in 113 patients (96.58%) and under general anesthesia in 4 patients (3.41%). Twenty-one patients (17.94%) were hospitalized and 3 patients (2.56%) required a blood transfusion. Conclusion: Epistaxis is the most common otorhinolaryngological emergency. It must be evaluated carefully to avoid the potential complications resulting from both epistaxis and its associated disorders, especially in geriatric patients.

Özet

Epistaxis is a common emergency in otolaryngology. The aim of this study is to analyze the etiology, management, and accompanying disorders of epistaxis in geriatric patients by reviewing the literature Materials and methods: Data of 117 patients 65 years old and older who presented to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology with active epistaxis between 2004 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were evaluated for age, sex, accompanying disorders, drug medication, detailed otorhinolaryngological findings, and management of epistaxis. Results: There were 67 women (57.26%) and 50 men (42.74%) with a mean age of 73.51 years (range: 65–90). Ninety-four (80.34%) patients had accompanying disorders such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, sinusitis, chronic obstructive lung disease, nasal polyp, and drug treatment. The bleeding site was anterior in 90 patients (76.92%) and posterior in 16 (13.67%). In 11 patients (9.4%), the bleeding site was not identified. Fifty-seven patients (48.71%) were treated with cauterization, 17 patients (14.52%) with nasal packing, 12 patients (10.25%) with medical treatment, 1 patient (0.85%) with mass excision and nasal packing, and 19 patients (16.23%) with more than 1 treatment method. Six patients (5.12%) were untreated because of the unidentified bleeding point. Bleeding control was performed under local anesthesia in 113 patients (96.58%) and under general anesthesia in 4 patients (3.41%). Twenty-one patients (17.94%) were hospitalized and 3 patients (2.56%) required a blood transfusion. Conclusion: Epistaxis is the most common otorhinolaryngological emergency. It must be evaluated carefully to avoid the potential complications resulting from both epistaxis and its associated disorders, especially in geriatric patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, A., KURTARAN, H., KANKILIÇ, E. S., ARK, N., UĞUR, K. Ş., GÜNDÜZ, M. (2014). Epistaxis in geriatric patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 133–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/394102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. O’Donnell M, Robertson G, McGarry GW. A new bipolar diathermy probe for the outpatient management of adult acute epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol 1999; 24: 537–541. Weiss NS. Relation of high blood pressure to headache, epistaxis, and selected other symptoms — The United States Health Examination Survey of Adults. N Engl J Med 1972; 287: 631–633.
  2. Massick D, Tobin EJ. Epistaxis. In: Cummings C, Haughey B, Thomas R, Harker L, Robbins T, Schuller D, Flint P, editors. Cummings Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Mosby; 2005. pp. 942–961.
  3. Pope LE, Hobbs CG. Epistaxis: an update on current management. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 309–314.
  4. Shaw CB, Wax MK, Wetmore SJ. Epistaxis: a comparison of treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109: 60–65. 6. Monte ED, Belmont MJ, Wax MK. Management paradigms for posterior epistaxis: a comparison of costs and complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121: 103–106.
  5. Gifford TO, Orlandi RR. Epistaxis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2008; 41: 525–536. 8. Genç S, Kürkçüoğlu ŞS, Karabulut H, Acar B, Tunçel Ü, Değerli S. Giant lobular capillary hemangioma of the nasal septum. Turk J Med Sci 2009; 39: 325–328. El-Guindy A. Endoscopic transseptal sphenopalatine artery ligation for intractable posterior epistaxis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 107: 1033–1037. Middleton MP. Epistaxis. Emergency Medicine Australasia 2004; 16: 428–440.
  6. Santos PM, Lepore ML. Epistaxis. In: Bailey BJ, Calhoun KH, Derkay CS, Friedman N, Gluckman J, Healy GB, Jackler RK, Johnson JT, Lambert PR, Newlands S et al., editors. Bailey’s Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 513–529.
  7. Herkner H, Havel C, Müllner M, Gamper G, Bur A, Temmel AF, Laggner AN, Hirschl MM. Active epistaxis at ED presentation is associated with arterial hypertension. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 92–95.
  8. Herkner H, Laggner AN, Müllner M, Formanek M, Bur A, Gamper G, Woisetschläger C, Hirschl MM. Hypertension in patients presenting with epistaxis. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 126–130.
  9. Lubianca Neto JF, Fuchs FD, Facco SR, Gus M, Fasolo L, Mafessoni R, Gleissner AL. Is epistaxis evidence of end-organ damage in patients with hypertension? Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 1111–1115.
  10. Alvi A, Joyner-Triplett N. Acute epistaxis: how to spot the source and the flow. Postgrad Med 1996; 99: 83–96.
  11. Thaha MA, Nilssen EL, Holland S, Love G, White PS. Routine coagulation screening in the management of emergency admission for epistaxis-is it