Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Factors associated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and validation in a sample of the Turkish population

Pages
104–108
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to validate the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the Turkish population and to investigate its correlation with the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Of the 257 patients enrolled in the study, 136 were male, 121 female, and the median age was 40.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Catastrophizing · pain · preoperative period

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the Turkish population and to investigate its correlation with the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Materials and methods: Volunteer patients, who were scheduled for elective surgery and who applied to the Outpatient Clinic of Anesthesiology for preoperative evaluation, were asked to complete a PCS form. The patient's age, sex, educational level, marital status, presence of chronic pain, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were recorded, and PCS scores and demographic variables were compared statistically. Results: Of the 257 patients enrolled in the study, 136 were male, 121 female, and the median age was 40. The 3 subscales in the Turkish version of the PCS consisted of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Internal consistency of PCS was found to be congruent with Cronbach's a = 0.90. Significantly higher PCS scores were found in women with chronic pain. In addition, patients who graduated from primary school had statistically higher scores compared to those who graduated from high school. Conclusion: In accordance with the original scale, demographic specifications of the Turkish version of the PCS were found congruent. PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.

Özet

The aim of this study was to validate the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the Turkish population and to investigate its correlation with the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Materials and methods: Volunteer patients, who were scheduled for elective surgery and who applied to the Outpatient Clinic of Anesthesiology for preoperative evaluation, were asked to complete a PCS form. The patient's age, sex, educational level, marital status, presence of chronic pain, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were recorded, and PCS scores and demographic variables were compared statistically. Results: Of the 257 patients enrolled in the study, 136 were male, 121 female, and the median age was 40. The 3 subscales in the Turkish version of the PCS consisted of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Internal consistency of PCS was found to be congruent with Cronbach's a = 0.90. Significantly higher PCS scores were found in women with chronic pain. In addition, patients who graduated from primary school had statistically higher scores compared to those who graduated from high school. Conclusion: In accordance with the original scale, demographic specifications of the Turkish version of the PCS were found congruent. PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜREN, M., OKAN, İ., GÖKBAKAN, A. M., KAYA, Z., ERKORKMAZ, Ü., ARICI, S., KARAMAN, S., KAHVECİ, M. (2014). Factors associated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and validation in a sample of the Turkish population. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 104–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/394097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Granot M, Ferber SG. The roles of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in the prediction of postoperative pain intensity: a prospective study. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 439–45.
  2. Fernandes L, Storheim K, Lochting I, Grotle M. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian pain catastrophizing scale in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 1–9.
  3. Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, Keefe F, Martin M, Bradley LA, Lefebvre JC. Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain 2001; 17: 52–64.
  4. Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 524–32.
  5. Tremblay I, Beaulieu Y, Bernier A, Crombez G, Laliberté S, Thibault P, Velly AM, Sullivan MJ. Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Francophone Adolescents: a preliminary validation. Pain Res Manag 2008; 13: 19–24. Marić A, Banožić A, Ćosić A, Kraljević S, Sapunar D, Puljak L. Validation of the Croatian pain catastrophizing scale through a study on the influence of medical education on pain catastrophizing. Period Biol 2011: 113; 171–5. Deyo RA. Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 569–73.
  6. Frischenschlager O, Pucher I. Psychological management of pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 416–22.
  7. Turk DC, Okifuji A. Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 678–90.
  8. Keefe FJ, Abernethy AP, Campbell LC. Psychological approaches to understanding and treating disease-related pain. Annu Rev Psychol 2005; 56: 601–30.
  9. Johnson C, Birthwistle J, Davis C. Pain in upper abdominal malignancy. Turk J Med Sci 2007; 37: 327–31.
  10. Paksoy Erbaydar N, Çilingiroğlu N. Chronic pain and depression: a descriptive survey among adult primary health care centre patients. Turk J Med Sci 2010; 40: 707–14.
  11. Lee EJ, Wu MY, Lee GK, Cheing G, Chan F. Catastrophizing as a cognitive vulnerability factor related to depression in workers’ compensation patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2008; 15: 182–92.
  12. Papaioannou M, Skapinakis P, Damigos D, Mavreas V, Broumas G, Palgimesi A. The role of catastrophizing in the prediction of postoperative pain. Pain Med 2009; 10: 1452–9.
  13. Leeuw M, Goossens ME, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JW. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence