Journals / Gıda / 2018 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

UTILIZATION OF WHITE GRAPE POMACE FOR LACTIC ACID PRODUCTION

BEYAZ ÜZÜM POSASININ LAKTİK ASİT ÜRETİMİNDE KULLANILMASI

Journal
Gıda
Pages
129–138
Publication Date
2018-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings show that WGP can be regarded as a sustainable plant-based feedstock for LA production by L. casei, however, the probable negative effect of other pomace constituents should be avoided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:White grape pomace (WGP) contains high amount of soluble carbohydrates (glucose and fructose), which can potentially be used as a carbon source in the fermentative production of bio-based chemicals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adding WGP directly into the culture medium at a solid loading of 10% yielded 33.3 g/L LA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings show that WGP can be regarded as a sustainable plant-based feedstock for LA production by L. casei, however, the probable negative effect of other pomace constituents should be avoided.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:üzüm posası · laktik asit · otoliz

Abstract

White grape pomace (WGP) contains high amount of soluble carbohydrates (glucose and fructose), which can potentially be used as a carbon source in the fermentative production of bio-based chemicals. In this study, this waste was valorized by lactic acid (LA) production by Lactobacillus casei. Adding WGP directly into the culture medium at a solid loading of 10% yielded 33.3 g/L LA. Water extract of WGP allowed comparably faster LA production. Increasing the solid loading in the extraction step increased the LA titers, however, it had a significant negative effect on the production rate. In all cases, fructose was consumed at a slower rate as compared to glucose. Yeast extract powder was required at a concentration of 10 g/L to support LA production. Alternatively, baker’s yeast was autolyzed and the lysate was successfully used as the nitrogen source. The findings show that WGP can be regarded as a sustainable plant-based feedstock for LA production by L. casei, however, the probable negative effect of other pomace constituents should be avoided.

Özet

Beyaz üzüm posası (BÜP), biyo-temelli kimyasalların fermantasyonla üretimi için kullanılma potansiyeline sahip yüksek miktarda çözünmüş karbonhidrat (glikoz ve fruktoz) içerir. Bu çalışmada, bu atık Lactobacillus casei ile laktik asit (LA) üretilerek değerlendirilmiştir. BÜP kültür ortamına %10 oranında doğrudan eklendiğinde 33.3 g/L LA elde edilmiştir. BÜP’ün sulu özütü daha hızlı bir LA üretimi sağlamıştır. Özüt çıkarma aşamasında posa miktarının artırılması sayesinde daha fazla LA elde edilmiştir ancak, bu işlem üretim verimini kayda değer biçimde düşürmüştür. Tüm koşullarda fruktoz glikoza göre daha yavaş kullanılmıştır. LA üretimi için 10 g/L maya özütü tozu gerekmiştir. Buna alternatif olarak, ekmek mayası otolize uğratılmış ve bu lizat azot kaynağı olarak başarıyla kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, BÜP’ün L. casei ile LA üretimi için sürdürülebilir bir kaynak olduğu düşünülebilir, ancak, posada bulunan diğer maddelerin olası olumsuz etkileri önlenmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKKİLECİ, A. O., BAYRAK, E. (2018). UTILIZATION OF WHITE GRAPE POMACE FOR LACTIC ACID PRODUCTION. Gıda, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 129–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/39247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abdel-Rahman, M.A., Tashiro, Y., Sonomoto, K. (2013). Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnology Advances 31(6): 877-902.
  2. Basu, S., Bose, C., Ojha, N., Das, N., Das, J., Pal, M., Khurana, S. (2015). Evolution of bacterial and fungal growth media. Bioinformation 11(4): 182-184.
  3. Bolner de Lima, C.J., Coelho, L.F., Blanco, K.C., Contiero, J. (2009). Response surface optimization of D(-)-lactic acid production by Lactobacillus SMI8 using corn steep liquor and yeast autolysate as an alternative nitrogen source. African Journal of Biotechnology 8(21): 5842-5846.
  4. Borzani, W., Sanchez Podlech, P.A., Luna, M.F., Jerke, P.R., Stein, M.A.C.F. (1993). Kinetics of semicontinuous microbial transformation of whey by Lactobacillus bulgaricus varying the initial concentration of yeast autolysate. Journal of Biotechnology 31(1): 61-66.
  5. Botella, C., Ory, I.d., Webb, C., Cantero, D., Blandino, A. (2005). Hydrolytic enzyme production by Aspergillus awamori on grape pomace. Biochemical Engineering Journal 26(2): 100-106.
  6. Bustos, G., Moldes, A.B., Cruz, J.M., Domínguez, J.M. (2004). Formulation of low-cost fermentative media for lactic acid production with Lactobacillus rhamnosus using vinification lees as nutrients. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52(4): 801-808.
  7. Buyukkileci, A.O., Harsa, S. (2004). Batch production of L(+) lactic acid from whey by Lactobacillus casei (NRRL B-441). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 79(9): 1036-1040.
  8. Carreira, P., Mendes, J.A.S., Trovatti, E., Serafim, L.S., Freire, C.S.R., Silvestre, A.J.D., Neto, C.P. (2011). Utilization of residues from agro-forest industries in the production of high value bacterial cellulose. Bioresource Technology 102(15): 7354-7360.
  9. Castillo Martinez, F.A., Balciunas, E.M., Salgado, J.M., Domínguez González, J.M., Converti, A., Oliveira, R.P.d.S. (2013). Lactic acid properties, applications and production: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 30(1): 70-83.
  10. Choi, I.S., Lee, Y.G., Khanal, S.K., Park, B.J., Bae, H.J. (2015). A low-energy, cost-effective approach to fruit and citrus peel waste processing for bioethanol production. Applied Energy 140: 65-74.
  11. Corbin, K.R., Hsieh, Y.S.Y., Betts, N.S., Byrt, C.S., Henderson, M., Stork, J., DeBolt, S., Fincher, G.B., Burton, R.A. (2015). Grape marc as a source of carbohydrates for bioethanol: Chemical composition, pre-treatment and saccharification. Bioresource Technology 193: 76-83.
  12. Deng, Q., Pen