SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Artuklu Kaime Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF UNIVERSITIES AND ITS IMPACT ON BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL REPUTATION: THE CASE OF MARDIN ARTUKLU UNIVERSITY

Musallam GELO ABEDTALAS
Ahmet KAYAOĞLU
Abdul Nasser JASSEM AL-JASSEM
Dawoud ALMOHAMMAD
Cumali KILIÇ
Pages
143–163
Publication Date
2019-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that there is less than medium level of recognition, the administrative staff has the highest level of recognition between the stakeholders and the social responsibility, in general, has very important role in building the organizational reputation for the university, with different levels of importance for the different fields of practicing social responsibility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article investigates the stakeholder's recognition for the Mardin Artuklu University's activities relating to social responsibility and its impact on the university's organizational reputation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using data collected from a straddle sample of 919 persons of stakeholders of the university, we carried out ANOVA, two independent samples t test and multiple linear regression.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that there is less than medium level of recognition, the administrative staff has the highest level of recognition between the stakeholders and the social responsibility, in general, has very important role in building the organizational reputation for the university, with different levels of importance for the different fields of practicing social responsibility.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Sorumluluk · Kurumsal İmaj · Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi

Abstract

This article investigates the stakeholder's recognition for the Mardin Artuklu University's activities relating to social responsibility and its impact on the university's organizational reputation. Using data collected from a straddle sample of 919 persons of stakeholders of the university, we carried out ANOVA, two independent samples t test and multiple linear regression. The results suggest that there is less than medium level of recognition, the administrative staff has the highest level of recognition between the stakeholders and the social responsibility, in general, has very important role in building the organizational reputation for the university, with different levels of importance for the different fields of practicing social responsibility.

Özet

Bu makale, Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi'nin sosyal sorumlulukla ilgili faaliyetlerinde paydaşların tanınırlığını ve bunun Üniversite’nin örgütsel itibarı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Üniversitenin paydaşlarından seçilmiş, 919 kişilik örneklemden veri toplanarak, iki bağımsız örneklem t testi, çoklu doğrusal regresyon ve ANOVA testi uygulanarak analiz edildi. Sonuç olarak; orta dereceden daha az tanınırlık olduğunu ve idari personelin paydaşlar arasında en yüksek düzeyde tanınma düzeyine sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, sosyal sorumluluğun farklı alanlardaki uygulamaları, farklı seviyelerde öneme sahip olmak üzere Üniversite’nin kurumsal itibarının oluşturulmasında çok önemli bir role sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABEDTALAS, M. G., KAYAOĞLU, A., AL-JASSEM, A. N. J., ALMOHAMMAD, D., KILIÇ, C. (2019). THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF UNIVERSITIES AND ITS IMPACT ON BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL REPUTATION: THE CASE OF MARDIN ARTUKLU UNIVERSITY. Artuklu Kaime Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 143–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/3922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ENGLISH- Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, Harper & Row- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48-
  2. Chajet, C. (2009). Corporate Reputation and the Bottom Line, Part I: Corporate Reputation as a Strategic Asset,. New York: Corporate Reputation Review, 19-23.-
  3. Drucker, P. F. (1954).
  4. The practice of management. New York, Harper & Row.- Griffin, J. J., and Mahon, J. F., (1997). "The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research,", Business & Society, Vol. 36 (5), 5-31- Hendriks M., (2016).
  5. Organizational Reputation, Organizational Attractiveness and Employer Branding: Clarifying the Concepts, Master Thesis.- Iwu-Egwuonwu, PC. (2011). Corporate Reputation &Firm performance: Empirical Literature Evidence. International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (4), 197- 204- Jose Luis Vazquez, A. L. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Higher Education: Uruguay University Students’ Perceptions, Economics & Sociology, 6(2), 145-157.-
  6. Marin Burcea, P. M. (2011). Students' Perceptions on Corporate Social Responsibility at the Academic Level: Case Study University of Bucharest, Romania, x111(29(,15-20-
  7. Muhammed Shafi, M.K. (2014). Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Indian Higher Education: Issues and Challenges,. International Journal Of Recent Research in commerce Economics and Management, 1 (1), 36-46.-
  8. Othman, R. a. (2014). Higher education institutions and social performance: evidence from public and privet universities,. International Journal of Business and Society, 15 (1), 1-18.-
  9. Ponzi, L.J., Fombrun, C.J. and Gardberg, N.A. (2011), “RepTrak™ Pulse: conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation”, Corporate Reputation Review, 14 (1), 15-35.-
  10. Robbins, F. (1999).
  11. The Business Managers Dilemma, Identifying Social. Journal of General Management, 2(1), 147-153-
  12. Robbins, M. and Smith, D. (2000), Managing Risk for Corporate Governance, British Standards Institution, PD 6668:2000-
  13. Siltaoja, M. (2006). Value Priorities as Combining Core Factors Between CSR and Reputation – A Qualitative Study, Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 91-111.-
  14. Teodoresco, S. a. (2012). “Corporate reputation is you most Strategic asset at Risk, Cirano Knowledge into action", Center for Inter University Research and Analy