Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 53

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TEMPORARY PROTECTION POLICY IN INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF POLICY TRANSFER: THE CASE OF GERMANY, NETHERLANDS AND TURKEY

ULUSLARARASI GÖÇTE GEÇİCİ KORUMA POLİTİKASININ POLİTİKA TRANSFERİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ: ALMANYA, HOLLANDA VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
855–886
Publication Date
2021-12-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research ,it has been revealed by comparative methods that the temporary protection policy in Turkey is a policy influenced by Duldung and TROO and has a hybrid (mixed) structure with inspiration and emulation from the degrees of policy transfer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The process of the emergence of the international temporary protection policy, the minimum standards applied and their scope have been analyzed through the examples of Germany, the Netherlands and examined in the context of policy transfer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was discussed within the framework of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458 issued in 2013, in particular within the framework of the policy transfer on the practice of temporary protection created to regulate the situation of Syrians under temporary protection who came to Turkey after 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research ,it has been revealed by comparative methods that the temporary protection policy in Turkey is a policy influenced by Duldung and TROO and has a hybrid (mixed) structure with inspiration and emulation from the degrees of policy transfer.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası Göç · Politika Transferi · Mülteciler

Abstract

The process of the emergence of the international temporary protection policy, the minimum standards applied and their scope have been analyzed through the examples of Germany, the Netherlands and examined in the context of policy transfer. The study was discussed within the framework of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458 issued in 2013, in particular within the framework of the policy transfer on the practice of temporary protection created to regulate the situation of Syrians under temporary protection who came to Turkey after 2011. The aim of the study is to understand which country the temporary protection policy implemented by Turkey was inspired by, and which of the policy transfer degrees "copying", "adaptation", "hybridization", "synthesis" and "inspiration" was applied. With the study, the sample applications of temporary protection policies in Europe (Germany, the Netherlands and Turkey) and the similarities and minimum standards of the policies will be revealed by comparative analysis method. The study data were collected by literature review, documentation/text review, and data analysis was performed by comparison method. This study is important in terms of providing guidance and resources for future research due to the fact that academic research in its field is scarce and insufficient. According to the results of the research ,it has been revealed by comparative methods that the temporary protection policy in Turkey is a policy influenced by Duldung and TROO and has a hybrid (mixed) structure with inspiration and emulation from the degrees of policy transfer. In this framework, while analyzing where and how this application was taken and started to be implemented in Turkey, a step will be taken in terms of transferring it to new regions and developing it in the future.

Özet

Uluslararsı geçici koruma politikasının ortaya çıkış süreci, uygulanan asgarî standartlar ve bunların kapsamı Almanya, Hollanda örnekleri üzerinden analizler yapılarak politika transferi bağlamında incelenmiştir. Çalışma, 2013 yılında çıkarılan 6458 sayılı Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu çerçevesinde, özellikle 2011 sonrası Türkiye’ye gelen geçici koruma altındaki Suriyelilerin durumlarını düzenlemek üzere oluşturulan geçici koruma uygulaması politika transferi çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’nin uygulamakta olduğu geçici koruma politikasının hangi ülkeden esinlenilerek transfer edildiğini ve politika transferi derecelerinden olan “kopyalama”, “adaptasyon”, “melezleştirme”, “sentez” ve “esinlenme” durumlarından hangisinin uygulandığını anlamaktır. Çalışma ile Avrupa’daki geçici koruma politikalarının örnek uygulamaları (Almanya, Hollanda ve Türkiye) incelenecek olup, politikaların benzerlikleri ve asgarî standartları karşılaştırmalı analiz yöntemi ile ortaya çıkarılacaktır. Çalışma verileri literatür taraması, dökümantasyon/metin incelemesi ile toplanırken veri analizi karşılaştırma yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma, alanında akademik araştırmaların az ve yetersiz olması nedeniyle gelecekteki araştırmalara rehberlik ve kaynaklık etmesi açısından önemlidir. Araştırmanın çıktılarına göre; Türkiye’deki geçici koruma politikasının Duldung ve TROO’dan etkilenmiş bir politika olduğu ve politika transferi derecelerinden olan esinlenme ve öykünme ile melez (karma) bir yapıda olduğu karşılaştırmalı yöntemler ile ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çerçevede bu uygulamanın, nereden, nasıl alınarak Türkiye’de uygulanmaya başlanmış olduğu analiz edilirken, gelecekte yeni bölgelere transfer edilmesi ve geliştirilmesi konusunda bir adım atılmış olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPCU, E., ÖZBEK, C. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TEMPORARY PROTECTION POLICY IN INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF POLICY TRANSFER: THE CASE OF GERMANY, NETHERLANDS AND TURKEY. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 53, 855–886. https://ajindex.com/articles/391391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Amnesty International. (1997). Bosnia-Herzegovina: “Who’s Living in My House?: Obstacles to the Safe Return of Refugees and Displaced People. London: Amnesty International International Secretariat. Battjes, H., & Vries, K. (2005). Asylum in European Union Member States: Reception of Asylum Seekers and Examination of Asylum Applications. European Parliament. Amsterdam: European Parliament's committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. Aralık 22, 2019,http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2005/365968/IPOL-LIBE_ET(2005)365968_EN.pdf
  2. Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What Have We Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited. Political Studies Review, 9, 366–378.
  3. Bosswick, W. (2000). Development of asylum policy in Germany. Journal of Refugee Studies, 1(13), 43-60. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. (2006 ). Rückkehr aus Deutschland Forschungsstudie 2006 im Rahmen des Europäischen Migrationsnetzwerks. Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge). Bosswick, W. (2000). Development of asylum policy in Germany. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(1), 43-60. 12 05, 2019 tarihinde https://watermark.silverchair.com/13-1-43.pdf? token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAlcwggJTBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggJEMIICQAIBADCCAjkGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMOJW-HybC4XU1-bQIAgEQgIICCqXw8d6lS5nmMw2b5-3R24RqgnMMBwj547emVE6zgStqioy Ciğer, M. İ. (2016). Uluslararası Hukuka Uygun Geçici Koruma Rejiminin Unsurları Üzerine. Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 62-92.
  4. Clark, J. (1985). Policy Diffusion and Program Scope. Publius, 15, 61-70. doi:doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037569 Crépeau, F., & Holland, L. (1997).
  5. Temporary Protection, Continuing Insecurity: A Regime Replacing Convention Protection of Refugees in Violation of International Law, 1997. CanLIIDocs 216, 239 - 261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0829320100005263 Council of Europe Directive (2001/55/EC). (2001). Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing. Official Journal of the European Communities. 12 20, 2019 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32001L0055
  6. Council of the European Union. (2001). on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass in