Journals / İnönü University International Journal of Social Sciences (INIJOSS) / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

ON WAR POETRY: WILFRED OWEN VS. MEHMET AKIF ERSOY

Pages
30–36
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Whereas, Ersoy in his poems such as Çanakkale Şehitleri'ne (To the Martyrs of Çanakkale) and "Cenk Marşı" (Combat Anthem) encourages people to fight for their nation and supports the idea of glorious death and divine cause which is the very thing that Owen criticizes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz "War" means bargaining many innocent lives away in an outrageous bloodbath for the benefit of God-knows-whom for the ones who truly and closely have experienced it in the battlefield and it means sacrificing a few with a just cause for the good of many for the ones who have watched it in home fronts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Owen actively participated in World War I (1914-1918) and witnessed the savagery and atrocity of the war on the hot battle ground fighting for his life, which made him realize the disparity between what is won and what is lost and question for what cause they fight.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Whereas, Ersoy in his poems such as Çanakkale Şehitleri'ne (To the Martyrs of Çanakkale) and "Cenk Marşı" (Combat Anthem) encourages people to fight for their nation and supports the idea of glorious death and divine cause which is the very thing that Owen criticizes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Mehmet Akif Ersoy · Wilfred Owen · war poetry

Özet

Öz "War" means bargaining many innocent lives away in an outrageous bloodbath for the benefit of God-knows-whom for the ones who truly and closely have experienced it in the battlefield and it means sacrificing a few with a just cause for the good of many for the ones who have watched it in home fronts. These are the perspectives of English war poet Wilfred Owen and Turkish war poet Mehmet Akif Ersoy respectively. Owen actively participated in World War I (1914-1918) and witnessed the savagery and atrocity of the war on the hot battle ground fighting for his life, which made him realize the disparity between what is won and what is lost and question for what cause they fight. On the other hand, Ersoy was a political and religious figure during the Turkish Independence War (1919-1922), but he never actively fought in a battle. Thus, his ideas about the war remained more idealistic and hopeful about the future. Their ideas and beliefs are reflected in their poems concerning the important war of their times. Wilfred Owen sarcastically criticizes the false assumptions and empty promises that are given to the soldiers on the battlefield in his poems such as "Dulce et Decorum Est" and reflects the brutal and apathetic side of the war. Whereas, Ersoy in his poems such as Çanakkale Şehitleri'ne (To the Martyrs of Çanakkale) and "Cenk Marşı" (Combat Anthem) encourages people to fight for their nation and supports the idea of glorious death and divine cause which is the very thing that Owen criticizes.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, B. K. (2015). ON WAR POETRY: WILFRED OWEN VS. MEHMET AKIF ERSOY. İnönü University International Journal of Social Sciences (INIJOSS), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/3912

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Barker, A. (2014, June 6). Wilfred Owen – Dulce est Decorum Est – Full lecture and analysis by Dr. Andrew 2. Barker. [Online video lecture]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfyXGcByLxc 3. Bogacz, T. (1986). “A tyranny of words”: language, poetry, and antimodernism in England in the first World 4. War. The Journal of Modern History, 58(3), 643-668. 5. Düzdağ, M. E. (1996). Mehmet Akif Ersoy. Ankara: T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı. 6. Ersoy, M. A. (2008). Safahat. M. E. Düzdağ (Ed.). Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. 7. Hibberd, D. (2003). Wilfred Owen. London: Phoenix. 8. Köroğlu, E. (2007). Ottoman propaganda and Turkish identity: Literature in Turkey during World War I. New 9. York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10. Norgate, P. (1989). Wilfred Owen and the Soldier Poets. The Review of English Studies, 40(160), 516-530. 11. Oba, E., Öztürk, D., & Gürbüz, H. (2014). Milli mücadele döneminde Mehmet Akif ve İslamcılık”. Turkish 12. Studies, 9(12), 563-572. 13. Owen, W. (1986). The poems of Wilfred Owen. J. Stallworthy (Ed.). London: W. W. Norton & Company. 14. Pajaziti, A. (2013). Society-construction in Mehmet Akif Ersoy’s literary opus. Journal of Balkan Research Institute, 2(1), 89-99. 15. Slawek, T. (1985). “Dark pits of war”: Wilfred Owen’s poetry and the hermeneutics of war. Boundary 2, 14(1), 309-331.