Journals / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

A Study on Gifted Students' Perceptions about Concepts "Sport" through Drawing-writting Methodology

A Study on Gifted Students' Perceptions about Concepts "Sport" through Drawing-Writing Methodology

Pages
219–231
Publication Date
2019-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was seen that students mostly made drawings belonging of as a amusement , and developmental domains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine emotion and opinion of gifted students attending to Science and Art Center towards sports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, study group was composed of 61 students who attended to Science and Art Centers in Ankara cities during the spring semester of 2018-2019 academic years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was seen that students mostly made drawings belonging of as a amusement , and developmental domains.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gifted students · sports · perceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine emotion and opinion of gifted students attending to Science and Art Center towards sports. In this study, study group was composed of 61 students who attended to Science and Art Centers in Ankara cities during the spring semester of 2018-2019 academic years. It was used qualitative research approach in this study. The drawing-writing technique was used as data collection instruments. The data obtained from participants were coded from 1 to 61. The data collected were subject to content analysis. Categories were given according to frequencies values. While collecting research data, students were asked to fill personal information forms and to draw their about sports. Content analysis method was utilized for data analysis. These steps were coding and sorting, creating a sample metaforest list, setting categories, providing validity and reliability, and converting metaphors into quantitative data. Obtained data were transposed to tables with descriptive statistics as frequency values and percentile values. As a result, it was seen that students mostly made drawings belonging of as a amusement , and developmental domains.

Özet

The purpose of this study is to determine emotions and opinions of gifted students attending to Science and Art Center towards sports. In this study, study group was composed of 61 students who attended to Science and Art Centers in Ankara cities during the spring semester of 2018-2019 academic years. It was used qualitative research approach in this study. The drawing-writing technique was used as data collection instruments. The data obtained from participants were coded from 1 to 61. The data collected were subject to content analysis. Categories were given according to frequencies values. While collecting research data, students were asked to fill personal information forms and to draw their about sports. Content analysis method was utilized for data analysis. These steps were coding and sorting, creating a sample metaphor list, setting categories, providing validity and reliability, and converting metaphors into quantitative data. Obtained data were transposed to tables with descriptive statistics as frequency values and percentile values. As a result, it was seen that students mostly made drawings belonging of as a amusement , and developmental domains.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKEL, A. Ö., YAZICIOĞLU, H., İLHAN, L. (2019). A Study on Gifted Students' Perceptions about Concepts "Sport" through Drawing-writting Methodology. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 219–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/390799

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Onüçüncübaskı). Ankara:
  2. Pegem Akademi Yayınları Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (5. Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Davis, G.A ve Rimm, S.B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented. (4th Ed), Allyn ve Bacon, Boston, MA. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide For Social Scientists. London: Routledge Publications. Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  3. Anı Yayıncılık. Ergun, N.(2003) Bedensel Engelli Çocuk ve Spor. Çoluk Çocuk Dergisi, 5, 26: 50. Fişek, K. (1985). 100 soruda Türkiye spor tarihi. İstanbul:
  4. Gerçek Yayınevi.
  5. Heward, W.L. ve Orlansky, M. D. (1980).
  6. Exceptional Children, Merrill Publishing Company, USA. Karakaş, S. (2000). Zekâ, ülkemizdeki durum, işlevsel ve yapısal unsurlar. Türkiye Zekâ Vakfı Yaratıcı Zekâ ve Eğitim Sempozyumu Bildirileri, 22-30.
  7. Karakaş, S. ve Doğutepe-Dinçer, E. (2011). Nöropsikolojik testlerin çocuklar için araştırma ve geliştirme çalışmaları: Bilnot-Çocuk. İstanbul:
  8. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri. Karaşahinoğlu, T. & İlhan, E. (2019). Beden Eğitimi Öğretmeni Algısına Yönelik Öğrenci Çizimlerinin İncelenmesi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 24(1), 1-15.
  9. Koegh, B. & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-446.
  10. Koshy, V., Robinson, N. M. (2006). Too long neglected: Gifted young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 14, 113-126.
  11. Leana-Taşcılar, M.Z. (2016). Üstün yetenekli ve normal öğrencilerin planlama becerileriyle ilgili deneysel bir araştırma. Türk Üstün Zekâ ve Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(2), 55-70.
  12. Leana-Taşcılar, M.Z. ve Cinan, S. (2012). Üstün zekâlı ve normal zekâlı çocuklarda yönetsel işlevler: Londra Kulesi Testi. Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi, 32(1), 13-30.
  13. Lehmann, H. C. Witty, P. A (1927). The play behavior of fifty gifted children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18(4), 259-265. MoNE BİLSEM Directive, 2015).
  14. Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi, Ankara.
  15. Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. California: Sage. Morelock, M. J., & Morrison, K. (1999). Differentiating “developmentally appropriate”: The multidimensional curriculum model for the young gifted children. Roeper Review, 21(3), 195-200