SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gıda / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

DETECTION OF PORK, HORSE OR DONKEY MEAT ADULTERATION IN BEEF-BASED FORMULATIONS BY FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY

SIĞIR ETİ KARIŞIMLARINDA DOMUZ, AT VE EŞEK ETİ TAĞŞİŞİNİN FOURIER DÖNÜŞÜMLÜ KIZILÖTESİ SPEKTROSKOPİSİ İLE BELİRLENMESİ

Prof. Dr. Kezban CANDOĞAN
Ebru DENİZ
Evrim GÜNEŞ ALTUNTAŞ
Naşit İĞCİ
Duygu ÖZEL DEMİRALP
Journal
Gıda
Pages
369–379
Publication Date
2020-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), the region between 1480-1425 cm-1 was able to separate all donkey adulterated mixtures, 100% beef and 100% donkey meat from each other with 100% sensitivity and specificity while 2980-2880 cm-1, whole spectrum and FR provided differentiation for beef-horse mixtures. 1760-1710 and 1210-1190 cm−1 regions provided classification between 100% beef, 100% pork and pork-beef mixtures (except for 5% of substituted) with 100% sensitivity and specificity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy with chemometrics was employed to discriminate pork, horse or donkey meat substitution in beef.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Wavenumber range of 1480-1360 cm−1 (94.97% of variance is explained by the first two principal components) and fingerprint region (FR) (90.08%) clearly differentiated beef, pork and beef-pork mixtures in principal component analysis (PCA).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), the region between 1480-1425 cm-1 was able to separate all donkey adulterated mixtures, 100% beef and 100% donkey meat from each other with 100% sensitivity and specificity while 2980-2880 cm-1, whole spectrum and FR provided differentiation for beef-horse mixtures. 1760-1710 and 1210-1190 cm−1 regions provided classification between 100% beef, 100% pork and pork-beef mixtures (except for 5% of substituted) with 100% sensitivity and specificity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beef · donkey meat · horse meat

Abstract

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy with chemometrics was employed to discriminate pork, horse or donkey meat substitution in beef. Wavenumber range of 1480-1360 cm−1 (94.97% of variance is explained by the first two principal components) and fingerprint region (FR) (90.08%) clearly differentiated beef, pork and beef-pork mixtures in principal component analysis (PCA). For beef-donkey mixtures, 1760-1710 cm−1 (99.31%) and FR (96.03%) provided discrimination. For beef-horse meat mixtures; a grouping was obtained for 1290-1210 cm−1 (90.41%), FR (84.83%) and whole spectrum (88.61%). In hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), the region between 1480-1425 cm-1 was able to separate all donkey adulterated mixtures, 100% beef and 100% donkey meat from each other with 100% sensitivity and specificity while 2980-2880 cm-1, whole spectrum and FR provided differentiation for beef-horse mixtures. 1760-1710 and 1210-1190 cm−1 regions provided classification between 100% beef, 100% pork and pork-beef mixtures (except for 5% of substituted) with 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Özet

Sığır eti karışımlarında domuz, at ve eşek etleri tağşişinin belirlenmesinde Fourier Dönüşümlü Kızılötesi (FTIR) spektroskopisi, kemometri ile birlikte kullanılmıştır. Temel bileşenler analizinde (PCA) sığır, domuz ve sığır-domuz eti karışımları 1480-1360 cm−1 (varyansın %94.97’si ilk iki temel bileşen tarafından açıklanmıştır) dalga sayısı aralığında ve parmak izi bölgesinde (PB) (%90.80) ayırt edilmiştir. Sığır-eşek eti karışımlarının ayrımında, 1760-1710 cm−1 dalga sayısı aralığı (%99.31) ve PB (%96.03) başarılı olurken; sığır-at eti karışımlarında 1290-1210 cm−1 (%90.41) aralığı, PB (%84.83) ve tüm spektrumda (%88.61) gruplama sağlanmıştır. Hiyerarşik kümeleme analizinde (HCA), 1480-1425 cm-1 dalga sayısı aralığı tüm eşek eti karışımlarının, %100 eşek eti ve %100 sığır etinin; 2980-2880 cm-1 dalga sayısı aralığı, tüm spektrum ve PB ise sığır-at karışımlarının, %100 at ve %100 sığır örneklerinin ayrımında %100 duyarlılık ve özgüllükte kullanılabilecek bölgeler olarak belirlenmiştir. 1760-1710 ve 1210-1190 cm−1 arasındaki bölgeler %100 sığır, %100 domuz ve domuz-sığır karışımlarının (%5ʼlik karışım hariç) %100 duyarlılık ve özgüllük ile kümelenmesini sağlamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANDOĞAN, P. D. K., DENİZ, E., ALTUNTAŞ, E. G., İĞCİ, N., DEMİRALP, D. Ö. (2020). DETECTION OF PORK, HORSE OR DONKEY MEAT ADULTERATION IN BEEF-BASED FORMULATIONS BY FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY. Gıda, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 369–379. https://ajindex.com/articles/39022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Al-Jowder O, Kemsley E and Wilson RH (2002) Detection of adulteration in cooked meat products by mid-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(6): 1325-1329.
  2. Alamprese C, Casale M, Sinelli N, Lanteri S and Casiraghi E (2013) Detection of minced beef adulteration with turkey meat by UV–vis, NIR and MIR spectroscopy. LWT-Food Science and Technology 53(1): 225-232.
  3. Ayhan, B (2013) Multiple Myeloma (Plazma Hücre Kanseri)’nın Spektrometrik ve Spektroskopik Yöntemler ile Araştırılması. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ankara University Biotechnology Institute, Ankara. BBC (2013a) Q&A: Horsemeat scandal. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-21335872 BBC (2013b) South Africa study finds donkey meat sold as beef. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-2158857
  4. Blakeway S (2014) The multi-dimensional donkey in landscapes of donkey human interaction. In Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 'Minding Animals: Part 1', Edited by Rod Bennison, Alma Massaro, Jessica Ulrich 2 (1) pp: 59-78. Cuadros-Rodríguez L, Ruiz-Samblás C, Valverde-Som L, Pérez-Castaño E and González-Casado A (2016) Chromatographic fingerprinting: An innovative approach for food 'identitation' and food authentication–A tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta 909: 9-23.
  5. Deniz E, Güneş Altuntaş E, Ayhan B, İğci N, Özel Demiralp D and Candoğan K (2018) Differentiation of beef mixtures adulterated with chicken or turkey meat using FTIR spectroscopy. J Food Process Preserv 42:e13767. Farouk MM (2013). Advances in the industrial production of halal and kosher red meat. Meat Science 95(4): 805-820. Federal Register. 2009. Volume 74, Issue 64: 15497-15499, April 6. Helfer GA, Bock F, Marder L, Furtado JC, Costa ABD, and Ferrão MF (2015) Chemostat: Exploratory Multivariate Data Analysis Software. Química Nova 38(4): 575-579.
  6. Kurniawati E, Rohman A and Triyana K (2014) Analysis of lard in meatball broth using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Meat Science, 96(1): 94-98.
  7. McElhinney J, Downey G and O'Donnell C (1999) Quantitation of Lamb Content in Mixtures with Raw Minced Beef Using Visible, Near and Mid‐Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of Food Science 64(4): 587-591. Meza-Márquez OG, Gallardo-Velázquez T and Osorio-Revilla G (2010) Application of mid-infrared spectroscopy with multivariate analysis and soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA) for the detection of adulterants in minced beef. Meat Science 86(2): 511-519.
  8. Movasaghi Z, Rehman S and ur Rehm